It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: WeAreAWAKE
Except that Sean Spicer, when asked about the convo, didn't deny it. He spun Trump's words to explain what they meant and complained about whoever leaked this "highly classified" information!
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: paxnatus
a reply to: smurfy
Any Clinton foundation money has to be used in the proper manner, including not being allowed to use it for political purposes, and she doesn't seem to have been done for that,
Now I don't know where you are getting or not getting your information but rather than list dozens of examples proving the Clinton Foundation is a RICO, I will point out one of the most obvious ones...
The activists claim the Clintons squandered away billions of dollars which was intended to be used to rebuild Haiti after the horrific earthquake in the small country back in January of 2010. Hillary’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, acted as the United Nations special envoy to Haiti while Haiti was undergoing reconstruction. As secretary of state, Mrs. Clinton was in charge of the United States Emergency relief response and plans for recovery. According to the protesters, a portion of the money that was intended for the recovery was actually given to investors the Clintons’ favored. They added that organizations and people who are associated with the Clinton Foundation received an unfair advantage when Haitian commodities were auctioned off—including the rights to mine gold.
source[ur l=http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/09/hillary-clinton-email-213110?o=1]politico.com[/url]
Well, once again, "activists claim"...so you want to talk hearsay like everybody else. In any case, the special foundation for Haiti was called, 'the nonprofit Clinton Bush Haiti Fund' (that's G.W.Bush btw) and, in any case a grouping from Haiti met concerned business people in New York to request for $11.5 million in aid.
Apart from that you totally ignore the rest of my post which was the more relevant part...you know, the bit about Trump and Comey both saying at different times they are not prosecuting her???
So, let's not make theoryland into a truth by yet more theories.
No, let's. Why not after all?
There is no need for any proof of anything any more. I watched Chris Cuomo challenge a Republican Congressman on CNN yesterday to provide evidence that there is no evidence. :|
Why bother verifying sources? Why bother worrying about any truth? An 'activists claim' should be believed until the Clintons can prove they are wrong.
INVESTIGATING DONALD TRUMP, THE FBI SEES NO CLEAR LINK TO RUSSIA ...
WASHINGTON — For much of the summer, the F.B.I. pursued a widening investigation into a Russian role in the American presidential campaign. Agents scrutinized advisers close to Donald J. Trump, looked for financial connections with Russian financial figures, searched for those involved in hacking the computers of Democrats, and even chased a lead — which they ultimately came to doubt — about a possible secret channel of email communication from the Trump Organization to a Russian bank. Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government.
originally posted by: paxnatus
a reply to: Sillyolme
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! NO DOCUMENT! THAT MAKES IT HEARSAY!! ZERO EVIDENCE ...My Previous post to you, has the FBI stating that investigation of Donald Trump sees NO CLEAR LINK to RUSSIA!!! It's in the The New York Times ...And Comey was director!!
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: paxnatus
The real reason Trump fired Comey? Because he wouldn't drop the Russian investigation.
“I just fired the head of the FBI,” Trump, according to a document read to the Times by an American official. “I faced great pressure because of Russia. That’s taken off.”
www.foxnews.com...
This is what Trump told those Russians in the Oval Office the day after he fired Comey.
Does that mean they are canceled out or do you have problems with my source?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: sputniksteve
Does that mean they are canceled out or do you have problems with my source?
Is your source the Russians?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: sputniksteve
Do you understand that reporters do know who their sources are, but refuse to reveal their identity to protect their sources?