It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Clapper back in March told Meet the Press that when he issued a January 6th multiagency intelligence community assessment about Russian interference in the election, the report didn't include evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, essentially saying he hadn't been aware of any such evidence up through January 20th, his last day in office. On Sunday, he said that didn't necessarily mean there was no such evidence, because sometimes he left it up to agency chiefs like former FBI Director James Comey to inform him about certain things. "I left it to the judgment [of] Director Comey," Clapper said, "to decide whether, when and what to tell me about counterintelligence investigations." Clapper said something similar when he testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee last Monday. In prepared remarks, he essentially said that there was nothing odd about his not being informed about the existence of an FBI counterintelligence investigation involving Donald Trump's campaign. Speaking generally, Clapper seemed to imply that the Trump-Russia-collusion scandal, the thing colloquially known as #Russiagate all over the world now, may have originated in information gleaned by the intelligence community, who in turn may have tipped off the FBI.
I saw on tv last night
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: stosh64
The news has always been a trusted source of information.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: network dude
Independent Council will find Trump innocent and Obama and Hillary guilty of collusion to affect election outcome.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: mtnshredder
And yet, when a breaking event happens like someone ran their car over some people, everyone- and I mean EVERYONE turns to the news to find out what's happening.
Believe it or not, people still look to the news on tv to find out what's going on.
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
What if the proof all these Trump lovers keep clamoring for is proof that was obtained illegally andntherdore we can't use it until we can discover it legally?
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Sillyolme
So other than proving Trump was right, you got nothing.