It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Conspiracy Debunkers

page: 43
24
<< 40  41  42    44  45 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 02:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: pteridine


Well, that seems to contradict the "fell in its own footprint" claim that was just another non-starter by the "truth" movement.


Wrong.

The fact is, WTC 7 fell in it's own foot print and the building collapse inward. The fact is the outer walls folded inwards, NOT outwards.

Anyone looking at the photos of the aftermath can clearly see the building's out walls folded in and around the foot print.

Our eyes do not lie to us.


Maybe our eyes don't lie but A&E surely does.




posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:22 PM
link   
a reply to: pteridine



Maybe our eyes don't lie but A&E surely does.


To bad, you couldnt debunk anything from A&E, how is your ridiculing A&E making you credibal? How is that working for you?



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:25 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee



are you saying this photo is WTC 7 ?

No, I believe your photo here, is the remains of 6 World Trade Center.

Prove me wrong?
edit on 20-6-2017 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

The first image in the post is WTC 7.
This one.


Is it not your claim that all the buildings fell into their own footprint?
Is it not the Messiah's claim that they all fell into their own footprint? I could be mistaken, I gave up on having anything to do with Gage years ago when I discovered his close connections with the Nation of Islam amongst other things.
The guy is a charlatan that preys upon lack of knowledge and education.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:34 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Why did you post a photo of WTC 6?


Why repeat false information from 911 truth; it proves your source did not study WTC 7.


At lease the Truth movement doesnt post false photos of other buildings and claim they are WTC 7.

The WTC 7 did fall in it's own foot print, talk about being intellectually dishonest.
edit on 20-6-2017 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee

Why did you post a photo of WTC 6?

Isn't that obvious? To show what a lie it is to say that the buildings fell into their own footprints?



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee

Why did you post a photo of WTC 6?


Why repeat false information from 911 truth; it proves your source did not study WTC 7.


At lease the Truth movement doesnt post false photos of other building and claimed they are WTC 7.


But Gage sure likes to use WTC steel cut by thermal lance during cleanup as "proof" of thermite....



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee


Isn't that obvious? To show what a lie it is to say that the buildings fell into their own footprints?


I never said WTC 6 fell in it's foot print?

Where did I make that claim?



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee


Isn't that obvious? To show what a lie it is to say that the buildings fell into their own footprints?


I never said WTC 6 fell in it's foot print?

Where did I make that claim?


You don't get it?
Answer me this, what caused the damage to WTC 6?



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Is it not your claim that the twin towers and WTC 7 fell into their own footprints?



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:53 PM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux


But Gage sure likes to use WTC steel cut by thermal lance during cleanup as "proof" of thermite....


But, but, the government said all three WTC fell down by office fires, and one fell in an hour after being hit by a plane. The government said that all the floor Joist way below the WTC, magically failed all at once when they were not on fire.

Silly government NIST conspiracy theories, that few want to believe. The OS of the WTC is laughable, and not logical, and no credibal science supports it.


edit on 20-6-2017 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:56 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee


You don't get it?
Answer me this, what caused the damage to WTC 6?


I am not talking about WTC 6? Why are you bringing it up? I am talking about WTC 7 stop confusing everyone.




Why are you posting photos of WTC 6, when I am addressing WTC 7?

What does WTC 6 have to do with WTC 7? WTC 7 fell in it's own foot print.

WTC 6 exploded outwards, according to those photos you are showing.

edit on 20-6-2017 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee


You don't get it?
Answer me this, what caused the damage to WTC 6?


I am not talking about WTC 6? Why are you bringing it up? I am talking about WTC 7 stop confusing everyone.
Is it or is it not your claim that the twin towers and WTC 7 all fell into their own footprints? Can you please answer the question.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee


Is it or is it not your claim that the twin towers and WTC 7 all fell into their own footprints? Can you please answer the question.



WTC 1 did not fall into it's own foot print.

WTC 2 did not fall into it's own foot print.



WTC 7 did fall into it's foot print.

There, I have answered you question.

Interesting Psychology game you are playing here.

edit on 20-6-2017 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

Funny you defend the truth movement and try to create foot traffic by linking to their intellectually dishonest material....

www.abovetopsecret.com...


I don't care about any dead Truth movement. However, I see you are emotionally effected deeply by this so call dead movement.



Please outline the devices that you think brought down WTC 7.


Please explain why Aegis insurance didn't go after the owners of WTC 7 for sabotage in their lawsuit. The lawsuit was based on inadequate WTC 7 design and neglect in their attempt to prevent payout.

Please discredit the testimony and scientific documentation from the independent research conducted by the Aegis engineering expert witnesses that concluded fire lead to a series of failures that caused WTC 7 collapse. Based on inadequate fire proofing and floor connections not common in building design. Backed by numerous accounts by firefighters that WTC 7 gave indications it would fail on 9/11.

I see persons addressing your questions, and you willfully avoiding honest debate. Just you playing the "what about this and that game" that has been answered over and over for 15 years plus.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 05:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee

Why did you post a photo of WTC 6?


Why repeat false information from 911 truth; it proves your source did not study WTC 7.


At lease the Truth movement doesnt post false photos of other buildings and claim they are WTC 7.

The WTC 7 did fall in it's own foot print, talk about being intellectually dishonest.


Really WTC7 did NOT fall in its own footprint the South elevation was struck by the north tower and WTC7 fell in that direction look at the picture below how can the north wall be lying on TOP of the debris. We all know how easily you believe false claims don't we.




posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 05:09 PM
link   
a reply to: wmd_2008

Wrong.

WTC 7 did fall into it's own foot print, the photos alone prove that.

You want the casual readers to believe WTC 7 was a small building or something.

WTC 7 was a 47 story high-rise not just a tall building, but also a long building.
edit on 20-6-2017 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958


WTC 1 did not fall into it's own foot print.

WTC 2 did not fall into it's own foot print.

WTC 7 did fall into it's foot print.


Do you believe all three were controlled demolitions?



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 05:17 PM
link   
Thought this thread was of interest...

A 34-story building collapse into its own footprint in Brazil
www.internationalskeptics.com...

And the ever popular...
tehran-plasco-highrise-fire-and-collapse-9-11-wtc7-wtc1-2-comparisons
www.metabunk.org...



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 05:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: wmd_2008

Wrong.

WTC 7 did fall into it's own foot print, the photos alone prove that.

You want the casual readers to believe WTC 7 was a small building or something.

WTC 7 was a 47 story high-rise not just a tall building, but also a long building.


Explain the above picture !



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 40  41  42    44  45 >>

log in

join