It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Informer1958
If it looks like a duck, it's a duck.
If it quacks like a duck, it's a duck.
If it walks like a duck, it's a duck.
If it has feathers like a duck it's a duck, it's a duck.
The test implies that a person can identify an unknown subject by observing that subject's habitual characteristics. It is sometimes used to counter abstruse, or even valid, arguments that something is not what it appears to be.
The test implies that a person can identify an unknown subject by observing that subject's habitual characteristics. It is sometimes used to counter abstruse, or even valid, arguments that something is not what it appears to be.
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee
The test implies that a person can identify an unknown subject by observing that subject's habitual characteristics. It is sometimes used to counter abstruse, or even valid, arguments that something is not what it appears to be.
Said no source.
originally posted by: D8Tee
originally posted by: Informer1958
To support the OS statist flow, one has to ignore credibal science.
Funny though, NIST was forced to change it science that WTC7 fell faster than free fall, for 2 seconds faster than natural free fall.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Nothin
110,168 Number of registered architects in the United States in 2015.
820,000+ Number of civil engineers in the United States.
.3% of engineers and architects are A/E 911Truth......
What was your question again?
originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: bloodymarvelous
It's called a "crawl space". Have you ever worked in a crawl space? Nobody ever comes down into a crawl space to check on you and see what you are doing.
You are inventing something that didn't exist.
The horizontal supports would have been accessible via crawl spaces between the floors. Severing them is really all you have to do. The vertical supports are riveted together with bolts. With nothing to brace them horizontally, those bolts are the sum total of all the strength they have to prevent wobbling.
The horizontal support were cheap floor trusses.
The vertical supports were the outside steel and the inner core. Nothing in between.
That's what throws off the logic of the conspiracy crowd.
The building was not constructed like any before nor since.
originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: bloodymarvelous
Sorry I have to note everything. Again, I am in the camp contracting floor tresses pulled the vertical columns and buckled them. The already strained structure could not safely distribute the load to remaining vertical columns. The columns snapped at the focus of stain, and initiated collapse. The static load became dynamic. Potential energy released as kinetic energy.
But you still would have shrapnel, an over pressure event, and one loud boom for a implosion initiated by charges.
Richard Gage invented the fizzle no flash bombs fantasy to make up for lacking evidence and lacking science for their theories.
And why has AE 9/11 Truth, and the vast majority of the conspiracy movement stuck to each floor must have had its resistance removed to achieve the witnessed collape speed.
If you prove a single point failure could initiate the collapse, then that means the NIST reports are actually valid. That means a single point failure could have caused the collapse of WTC 7. The truth movement will not stand for that.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Nothin
110,168 Number of registered architects in the United States in 2015.
820,000+ Number of civil engineers in the United States.
.3% of engineers and architects are A/E 911Truth......
What was your question again?
And as far as I've been able to find NIST has never offered any evidence that this should have happened. No models, no mockups using shotguns to simulate the explosion or anything like that. Losing the fireproofing is a requirement for their hypothesis and is therefore assumed to have happened.
Why are there so many 9/11 conspiracy debunkers? It's really amazing. As soon anything is posted there's always a response saying it's faked data or faked photoshopped image. It's just weird. And then there are whole sites devoted to 9/11 debunking.
You have to admit having a conspiracy theory is one thing. But being passionate about other peoples passion is just weird.
And don't forget search engines. The amount of SEO work that must go into this to make sure debunking sites always come up first is astounding. Honestly, you would think 9/11 debunking would just never exist.
Could they be doing so because they actually have an interest in the subject itself instead of others that are interested in it?
Almost 700 people from my state of NJ died that day - almost every town in Northern or Central NJ lost at least
resident. How would you like the names of your friends and neighbors trampled on in this manner....??
Yes, we debunkers are interested in the Truth.
Many surviving victims are not satisfied with the OS of 911, and have publicly spoken out about it.
The numbers are valid, why do you say they are not?
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Nothin
110,168 Number of registered architects in the United States in 2015.
820,000+ Number of civil engineers in the United States.
.3% of engineers and architects are A/E 911Truth......
What was your question again?
The question was directed to another poster, whom threw a disrespectful blanket over A&E for 9/11 Truth.
Your numbers are grossly wrong, very misleading, and a total distraction.
originally posted by: D8Tee
The numbers are valid, why do you say they are not?
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Nothin
110,168 Number of registered architects in the United States in 2015.
820,000+ Number of civil engineers in the United States.
.3% of engineers and architects are A/E 911Truth......
What was your question again?
The question was directed to another poster, whom threw a disrespectful blanket over A&E for 9/11 Truth.
Your numbers are grossly wrong, very misleading, and a total distraction.
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Nothin
No, they are not. Far more engineers and architects support the ideas that massive damage and fire killed those buildings than those who adhere to Box Boy Gage's ideas. Saying that more than 2,800 are members of A/E Truth as a way to bolster your ideas when there are far more that disagree with you is not a good debate practice.
Someone did look up the numbers.
Your attempts at distraction will not work.
If anyone is interested: they are free to look-up the numbers.
What are you some kinda wanna be moderator?
So if you wish to participate further: please mention why you spend so much time and energy, arguing against the 9/11 conspiracy.
You do that, and next time do it without announcing it in the thread please.
(Will see if moderators have been notified.)
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Nothin
Someone did look up the numbers.
Your attempts at distraction will not work.
If anyone is interested: they are free to look-up the numbers.
110,168 Number of registered architects in the United States in 2015.
820,000+ Number of civil engineers in the United States.
.3% of engineers and architects are A/E 911Truth......
AND how many of those engineers are Structural Engineers?
Find that number if you want to look something up, get back to me.
What are you some kinda wanna be moderator?
So if you wish to participate further: please mention why you spend so much time and energy, arguing against the 9/11 conspiracy.
Use the alert post if you think you have an issue.
I'll remind you it was you that brought up the number of people in A&E for 911 truth as a talking point, did you want that BS to go unchallenged?
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: Nothin
Someone did look up the numbers.
Your attempts at distraction will not work.
If anyone is interested: they are free to look-up the numbers.
110,168 Number of registered architects in the United States in 2015.
820,000+ Number of civil engineers in the United States.
.3% of engineers and architects are A/E 911Truth......
AND how many of those engineers are Structural Engineers?
Find that number if you want to look something up, get back to me.
What are you some kinda wanna be moderator?
So if you wish to participate further: please mention why you spend so much time and energy, arguing against the 9/11 conspiracy.
Use the alert post if you think you have an issue.
I'll remind you it was you that brought up the number of people in A&E for 911 truth as a talking point, did you want that BS to go unchallenged?
That is an amazingly disingenuous post, filled with fallacies, and an insult to boot! Wow!
originally posted by: Nothin
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: PublicOpinion
Post was made stating that office fires don't burn hot enough to collapse a steel reinforced building
I showed the fallacy of that argument .....
In an aside the idiots at AE FOR TRUTH immediately declared it a "controlled demolition"
So you're saying: that the 2800+ Architects and Engineers, at A&E for 9/11 truth, are idiots?
How did you come to know this?