It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dennis Kucinich the only smart Liberal left on the planet

page: 1
20
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+2 more 
posted on May, 17 2017 @ 10:39 PM
link   
Here is former US Rep. Dennis Kucinich talking about the massive, treasonous leaks from the IC which are causing the Leftist witch hunt against Trump.
The only smart guy in a room filled with Leftist lunatics hell bent on destroying the US Democracy.



Look, I disagree with President Trump on a number of issues, but on this one there can only be one president, and somebody in the intelligence community is trying to up-end this president in order to pursue a policy direction that puts us in conflict with Russia. The question is, why? And who? And we need to find out.


www.cnsnews.com...


If you take a look at his campaign platform in the 2008 Presidential primaries, you could almost swap his name with Bernie Sanders in 2016.

en.m.wikipedia.org...

Guaranteed free education for all, including college.
Full coverage single-payer universal health care.
End the War on Drugs.
Full SS benefits at age 65.
So he is definitely not a moderate Liberal. And for him to call out the fu*king goons for what they are doing to Trump, I believe that he is the last of a dead, extinct breed.....a Democrat with a functioning brain.




posted on May, 17 2017 @ 10:53 PM
link   
I think I like that senator. He has good points, he is actually more concerned about investigating what is going on to find treasonous people in the intelligence agencies and in our government. I would hope this guys words are heard by other Senators and they do something about this problem. I also hope they do something to take away all the licenses of the owner of the Washington Post. I know he and Trump do not see eye to eye, but he is disrupting our government's ability to run smoothly with his twisting of evidence, this is not the first time he has done this.

The owner of the Washington post and Trump are like two Rams bucking it out, that needs to stop.

So, why didn't that guy run for president, it sounds like he is a good guy.
edit on 17-5-2017 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 10:59 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

Well which is it, all leftist and their policies are stupid, cannibalistic snowflake sjw's or no? I thought total generalizations were par for the course round here. Maybe we should refrain from generalizations and adding to the hate, and specify individuals or policies that we are displeased with instead of all left this and that.....nah...carry on.

I also thought anything close to socialism was the the devils work, hmmm.
And to the point, yes I agree with Kucinich here.



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:01 PM
link   
Mention the name, "Trump" around him and see if he has a meltdown...

It's kind of like how Catholics use the name Jesus to fight demons...

Mention the name Jesus and the Demon freaks out and has a meltdown and goes back to hell..

In this case it's liberals and you say, "Trump" and they begin having panic attacks and meltdowns and screech for 20 minutes strait.



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse

So, why didn't that guy run for president, it sounds like he is a good guy.


Kucinich?
He did run in 2004 and 2008.
He didn't do very well even considering he wanted to hand out everything for free before it was fashionable to do it like Bernie Sanders wanted to.
I am not saying I agree with his policies but he is the only Lib that isn't hyperventilating hysterically now.



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: waftist
a reply to: RazorV66

Well which is it, all leftist and their policies are stupid, cannibalistic snowflake sjw's or no? I thought total generalizations were par for the course round here. Maybe we should refrain from generalizations and adding to the hate, and specify individuals or policies that we are displeased with instead of all left this and that.....nah...carry on.

I also thought anything close to socialism was the the devils work, hmmm.
And to the point, yes I agree with Kucinich here.


I am not agreeing with his policies at all, I am merely pointing out that he is using his head for something other than a Russian hat rack. And he is the only Liberal to do so that I have seen.



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: rickymouse

So, why didn't that guy run for president, it sounds like he is a good guy.


Kucinich?
He did run in 2004 and 2008.
He didn't do very well even considering he wanted to hand out everything for free before it was fashionable to do it like Bernie Sanders wanted to.
I am not saying I agree with his policies but he is the only Lib that isn't hyperventilating hysterically now.


I have a feeling some of the other Dems are afraid to go against the grain. It seems that the Democrats are a lot more ruthless than the Republicans are in punishing their dissenters. Democrats also die more than Republicans. Seems like a few died on Hillary's campaign, whomever was really running that is probably who is controlling this. It could just be the EU, or it could be some other powerful person.



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:17 PM
link   
You do yourself a dis-service by using absolute words like ''only''. You cannot possibly believe that he is the ''only'' smart liberal. You surely must know it is not true. Certainly there might be others, don't you think? Or is it just that he is the only one you have heard of who agrees with some of your own perspective.



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:18 PM
link   
I disagree with my former Senator on most of his liberal policy issues, but there is no doubt he is one of the few semi-truthful, sincere, politicians out there. "I don't think anyone questions Mr. Kashkari that you're working hard. Our question is, who are you working for?" Kucinich actually understands the Globalist plot to destroy the U.S.



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
You do yourself a dis-service by using absolute words like ''only''. You cannot possibly believe that he is the ''only'' smart liberal. You surely must know it is not true. Certainly there might be others, don't you think?


Show me another one that gets face time on the MSM....just one.
I doubt CNN would even have Kucinich on, because his critical thinking on the situation is totally against their hysterical narrative. They would accuse him of being in bed with the Russians as well.
edit on 17-5-2017 by RazorV66 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:37 PM
link   
A high-ranking democrat DC politician with integrity - a veritable unicorn.

No wonder he never secured the nomination. The corrupt DNC made sure of that.



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:42 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

Only smart liberal left in the planet? lol come to California and you'll find liberals that although hate Trump, also hate Democrats and SJWs/Antifa types.

I'm one of those liberals.
edit on 5/17/2017 by starwarsisreal because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Deny Arrogance

Yep, I always liked Kucinich. The DNC did to him what the GOP did to Ron Paul. With a lot of help from the msm of course...



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:50 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

You do understand that your use of the word "leaks" implies some level of legitimacy and runs counter to the oft-cited cries of "fake news" - right?

I ask because I'm curious. If they are leaks, then there is implied validity. If they're lies then they are not leaks - they are slander.

My next question... If these are indeed leaks - then how do you rationalize that the release of the damning information is treasonous but the actions cited in the leaks, accusations of impropriety that could very well fall under the auspices of actual treason are somehow not?

There seems to be a considerable lack of internal consistency in the premise.

Given the evidence in the public domain one can, at best conclude, that the current POTUS is inept, underqualified and in over his head. Wouldn't the public want to be made aware of these shortcomings or any potential even more profound issues?
edit on 5/17/17 by Hefficide because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 17 2017 @ 11:51 PM
link   
a reply to: starwarsisreal

I will attest to that. I've seen your posts.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 12:00 AM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

Amen



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 01:49 AM
link   
I don't care for the partisan types but have liked him in the past. Too bad he didn't make his way to Washington State was hoping he'd help to improve it.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 03:21 AM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

The ONLY one? I highly doubt this.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 04:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: RazorV66

You do understand that your use of the word "leaks" implies some level of legitimacy and runs counter to the oft-cited cries of "fake news" - right?

I ask because I'm curious. If they are leaks, then there is implied validity. If they're lies then they are not leaks - they are slander.

My next question... If these are indeed leaks - then how do you rationalize that the release of the damning information is treasonous but the actions cited in the leaks, accusations of impropriety that could very well fall under the auspices of actual treason are somehow not?

There seems to be a considerable lack of internal consistency in the premise.

Given the evidence in the public domain one can, at best conclude, that the current POTUS is inept, underqualified and in over his head. Wouldn't the public want to be made aware of these shortcomings or any potential even more profound issues?


During the 2016 election, when Wikileaks was busting out all the Hilary Clinton emails in public, I distinctly remember the Trump people shouting about the source and reason behind the leaks doesn't matter, just look what's in them!

Now I see the same people screaming about leakers being traitors and should be busted. The irony and hypocrisy is not lost on me.

Hillary's email scandal now seems like small town gossip compared to the clear and present danger. Carelessness with classified info is a fart in a thunderstorm compared to all out treason, corruption, and selling out the country to our adversaries.



posted on May, 18 2017 @ 04:45 AM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66

Did they take the lie out of Lieberalism?



new topics

top topics



 
20
<<   2 >>

log in

join