It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The New York Times has not viewed a copy of the memo, which is unclassified, but one of Mr. Comey’s associates read parts of it to a Times reporter.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: DJW001
Did Trump literally tell Comey to drop the investigation?
Nope. Since he did not ask Comey to drop the investigation, what is this about again?
originally posted by: Outlier13
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: DJW001
Did Trump literally tell Comey to drop the investigation?
Nope. Since he did not ask Comey to drop the investigation, what is this about again?
The modern day witch hunt. Nothing more.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Outlier13
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: DJW001
Did Trump literally tell Comey to drop the investigation?
Nope. Since he did not ask Comey to drop the investigation, what is this about again?
The modern day witch hunt. Nothing more.
Liberals will soon be calling for Trump to be thrown into a river and if he drowns he's innocent, and guilty if he survives.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Outlier13
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: DJW001
Did Trump literally tell Comey to drop the investigation?
Nope. Since he did not ask Comey to drop the investigation, what is this about again?
The modern day witch hunt. Nothing more.
Liberals will soon be calling for Trump to be thrown into a river and if he drowns he's innocent, and guilty if he survives.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Outlier13
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: DJW001
Did Trump literally tell Comey to drop the investigation?
Nope. Since he did not ask Comey to drop the investigation, what is this about again?
The modern day witch hunt. Nothing more.
Liberals will soon be calling for Trump to be thrown into a river and if he drowns he's innocent, and guilty if he survives.
Not just libs, Trumps own party are calling for the investigation as well. And some Republicans actually mention.....gasp....Impeachment.
www.rawstory.com...
www.politico.com...
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: carewemust
I think McCain is still upset that Trump told people that McCain is no hero, rather a coward who ratted out his countrymen in exchange for luxury treatment whilst in captivity. He doesn't like people knowing the truth.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: carewemust
I think McCain is still upset that Trump told people that McCain is no hero, rather a coward who ratted out his countrymen in exchange for luxury treatment whilst in captivity. He doesn't like people knowing the truth.
I assume you were his cellmate that you can state that so authoritatively.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: carewemust
I think McCain is still upset that Trump told people that McCain is no hero, rather a coward who ratted out his countrymen in exchange for luxury treatment whilst in captivity. He doesn't like people knowing the truth.
I assume you were his cellmate that you can state that so authoritatively.
A senior US official told me... they gave me a dossier, or rather read it out over the phone.
Obviously I have to keep my sources secret.
originally posted by: DJW001
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: carewemust
I think McCain is still upset that Trump told people that McCain is no hero, rather a coward who ratted out his countrymen in exchange for luxury treatment whilst in captivity. He doesn't like people knowing the truth.
I assume you were his cellmate that you can state that so authoritatively.
originally posted by: PRSpinster
a reply to: xuenchen
Nope. I don't know about the credibility of other MSM news outlets but when Reuters prints it, it's factual.
I say that because I can personally attest to Reuters' veracity for the truth. They take massive amounts of time to properly investigate stories with each person in the editorial food chain providing constructive criticism plus their vote as to whether the story has merit prior to it ever being read by the public.
Flat out- they put every. single. story. through the grinder. It is, frankly, impressive. So, I'm going to go ahead and disagree. I trust them through my personal experience with the company and their operations.