It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LNJAXFL
In response to the title of this thread, so called "assault weapons" were never banned in the US in the first place so it would be impossible for it to happen again. The 1994 ban that recently expired banned the firearm from looking like an "assault weapon". They still had the same action, same bullet, same fire rate. The firearm could not be sold with more than two cosmetic aspects of an "assault weapon" such as a bayonet, pistol grip, folding stock, detachable magazine, flash suppressor etc. So you could have a bayonet and detachable magazine but no pistol grip for example. Of course any manufactured before the ban (and now after) could still be sold with all the cosmetic goodies but were essentially the same weapon.
The only other main thing was it banned the importation or manufacture of hi-capacity magazines(more than 10 rounds). The possession and sale of existing magazines(millions) was still allowed so other than a little price gouging they were still available.
So all in all it was a toothless ban the Democrats barely passedbefore losing the majority of seats to the Republicans (Al Gore as VP had to cast the deciding vote).
[edit on 13-3-2005 by LNJAXFL]
Black Market Guns -- Lessons from Hong Kong
by Angel Shamaya
KeepAndBearArms.com
Hong Kong has some of the strictest anti-gun laws in the world. Gun smugglers can expect to be executed for their trade. Possession of a gun can get you imprisoned for life, or simply killed. It's a police state; only the police and criminals have guns.
Fortunately, unlike some other countries, Hong Kong's press doesn't try to hide the fact that plenty of guns are smuggled into the country. In Living in the Shadow of the Gun (July 3, 2001, Hong Kong iMail Newspapers), Lara Wozniak, reveals with candor just how bad the Hong Kong black market gun problem truly is. While she says people pay as much as $5000 for an illegal firearm there, she explains that "you might not have to even spend a $10 coin on a gun if you are purchasing a big drug shipment." A tenspot for a criminal, while lawful citizens face lengthy jail terms or a bullet in the head if they are caught possessing a gun for defense against Hong Kong's brazen underworld thugs.
HK to stop inflow of guns after shooting case
2005-02-21 00:24:16 XinhuaEnglish
HONG KONG, Feb. 21(Xinhuanet)-- Hong Kong's Secretary for Security Ambrose Lee Monday voiced his grave concern about Sunday's shooting case and pledged that Hong Kong police will do their utmost to stop the inflow of guns into Hong Kong illegally.
Lee said the shooting case, the second involving guns in Hong Kong in less than one month, has drawn great attention of the HongKong Special Administrative Region government and the Hong Kong police.
Hong Kong police is looking into the robbery and shooting of a 49-year-old man in a Causeway Bay restaurant Sunday, and will do their utmost to stop the inflow of guns into Hong Kong illegally, he said.
At 4:15 p.m. Sunday the culprit went into a restaurant on HysanAvenue and reportedly fired one shot at the victim at the staircase when the latter was leaving after a meal. It is believedthe culprit struggled with the victim. He fled afterwards and the victim's watch was reported missing.
The victim has been sent to Queen Mary Hospital with abdominal injuries.
The culprit, about 1.73 meters and strongly built, was last seen wearing a light-colored knitted hat, a white mask, a coat anda pair of dark trousers.
I posted this here as bait...
I knew one of you - what to call you in this case? - GUN NUT's would take the bait.
Predictable.
Originally posted by Ruins
I was raised around guns so to me they are no more dangerous than a hammer or any other tool. It all comes down to how they are used.
There are no gun accidents, only lapses in peoples judgment, decisions or reasoning.
Originally posted by Krpano
Compare a hammer or any other tool is simply too silly.
A weapon is a tool, YES.....a tool created to kill.
If you carry a weapon its for only one purpose, to shoot someone.
Doesnt matter if its self defense or not, NOBODY has the right to make justice with its own hands.
NO, nobody is perfect...and like this you increase alot the accident situations.
Originally posted by Zabilgy
Didn't want to read all 10pages of this post but, regarding assault weapons.....What does the average citizen need with an assault weapon? What are you going to do with it? I underestand we have a right to bear arms, but we also have a right to judge some "arms" to be more than necessary for the average person to have. Should I be allowed to have Lars Rockets and C4 and hand grenades and land mines, as well as these assault weapons?? I would think I'd be watched by the FBI?CIA if I did.
Seriously....you gun freaks. What do you need an assault weapon for? Do you use them to hunt? Because if so, that's pretty gross and pathetic. Why not just take an animal you want to kill and put it in a cage and then shoot it....sounds about as difficult as killing an animal with an assault weapon.
Originally posted by Zabilgy
What does the average citizen need with an assault weapon?
What are you going to do with it? I underestand we have a right to bear arms, but we also have a right to judge some "arms" to be more than necessary for the average person to have. Should I be allowed to have Lars Rockets and C4 and hand grenades and land mines, as well as these assault weapons??
I would think I'd be watched by the FBI?CIA if I did.
Seriously....you gun freaks. What do you need an assault weapon for? Do you use them to hunt? Because if so, that's pretty gross and pathetic. Why not just take an animal you want to kill and put it in a cage and then shoot it....sounds about as difficult as killing an animal with an assault weapon.
Paul Hager: "One of the arguments that had been made against gun control was that an armed citizenry was the final bulwark against tyranny. My response had been that untrained, lightly-armed non-soldiers couldn't prevail against a modern army. I had concluded that the qualitative difference in firepower was such that all of the previous rules of guerilla war no longer applied. Both Vietnam and Afghanistan demonstrated that wasn't true. Repelling an armed invasion is not something that American citizens are likely to face, but the possibility of a despotic government coming to power is not wholly unthinkable. One of the sequellae of Vietnam was the rise of the Khmer Rouge and slaughter of perhaps a million Cambodian citizens. Those citizens, like the Jews in Germany or the Armenians in Turkey, were unarmed and thus utterly and completely defenseless against police and paramilitary. An armed minority was able to kill and terrorize unarmed victims with total impunity." – Paul Hagar, "Why I Carry"
George Mason: "To disarm the people is the most effectual way to enslave them."
Adolf Hitler: "The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler's Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens.
Mao Tse Tung: "All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party." (Problems of War and Strategy, Nov 6 1938, published in "Selected Works of Mao Zedong," 1965)
What does the average citizen need with an assault weapon?
Sigmund Freud: "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.
Admiral Yamamoto: "You cannot invade mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind each blade of grass." Advising Japan's military leaders of the futility of an invasion of the mainland United States because of the widespread availability of guns. It has been theorized that this was a major contributing factor in Japan's decision not to land on North America early in the war when they had vastly superior military strength. This delay gave our industrial infrastructure time to gear up for the conflict and was decisive in our later victory.
Ted Nugent: "To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic."
U.S. Sen. Malcolm Wallop: "The ruling class doesn't care about public safety. Having made it very difficult for States and localities to police themselves, having left ordinary citizens with no choice but to protect themselves as best they can, they now try to take our guns away. In fact they blame us and our guns for crime. This is so wrong that it cannot be an honest mistake." - former U.S. Sen. Malcolm Wallop (R-Wy.)
Paul Hager: "One of the arguments that had been made against gun control was that an armed citizenry was the final bulwark against tyranny. My response had been that untrained, lightly-armed non-soldiers couldn't prevail against a modern army. I had concluded that the qualitative difference in firepower was such that all of the previous rules of guerilla war no longer applied. Both Vietnam and Afghanistan demonstrated that wasn't true. Repelling an armed invasion is not something that American citizens are likely to face, but the possibility of a despotic government coming to power is not wholly unthinkable. One of the sequellae of Vietnam was the rise of the Khmer Rouge and slaughter of perhaps a million Cambodian citizens. Those citizens, like the Jews in Germany or the Armenians in Turkey, were unarmed and thus utterly and completely defenseless against police and paramilitary. An armed minority was able to kill and terrorize unarmed victims with total impunity." – Paul Hagar, "Why I Carry"
Diane Feinstein: "US Senator, If I could have banned them all - 'Mr. and Mrs. America turn in your guns' - I would have!" (Statement on TV program 60 Minutes, Feb 5 1995)
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
I wish that I could totally trust my Government to do what is best for me or at least best for the populous as a whole but time has proven that I can't trust them. Money and power corrupts. An armed populous is an equalizer. It would be difficult for a form of Government to take over due to the fact that Americans are well armed. I am personally apalled at people that murder others especially when they do it with a firearm since I feel that the second amendmant protects all of my other rights given to me in the Constitution.