It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New FOIA lawsuit Case that may reveal U.S. Attorney corruption

page: 3
11
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 08:07 PM
link   
Appeal update!



Appeals Detail
Case Title Brian Hill v. EOUSA
Circuit Fourth
Case Number 17-1866
Date Filed 2017-07-25
Date Closed
Party BRIAN DAVID HILL (Plaintiff - Appellant)
Party EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, EOUSA (Defendant - Appellee)
Party UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DOJ (Defendant - Appellee)
District Case VAW 4:2017cv00027
Documents Appeal Docket

archive.org...

Informal Appeal Brief entered by Plaintiff earlier on today.

www.archive.org... - INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Appellant Brian David Hill. [17-1866] (RW)

It appears that a lot of case law was used in this one.

The U.S. Attorney is claiming that Brian has no right to the law enforcement reports including his very own false confession audio due to exemptions under the FOIA law.

Brian has stated under Oath that he needs the evidence to cross reference and prove his actual innocence. He has asserted his rights under the 14th Amendment under Brady v. Maryland, and even Giglio v. United States.

He is asking that the exemptions not apply to the very criminal defendant requesting records on himself for the sole purpose of getting off the sex offender registry of Virginia and prove his actual innocence.

If the Court of Appeals grants his request for relief, then criminal defendants within the Fourth Circuit judicial district courts may be able to file lawsuits under FOIA as well, and re-request access to their own criminal discovery evidence packets of the very evidence that was used in the Grand Jury proceedings.

Brian isn't just screaming Infowars like I had thought. He has thoroughly planned to change the FOIA law to respect a criminal Defendant's constitutional right to prove innocence under the adversarial system and overturn wrongful convictions of innocent men and women forced into guilty pleas.

Back to here: archive.org...

archive.org... - Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider the Magistrate Judge's Order Under Document #32 and Objections to the Order; Motion, Objections and Memorandum/Brief in Support of This Objection re: [32] Order denying [4] Motion Under Rule 45 Asking the Clerk to Subpoena Attorney John Scott Coalter for Discovery and to Prove the Factual Matter Under Complaint; denying [19] Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas to Produce Documents and Subpoenas to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action; denying issuance of [20] Proposed Subpoena to Town of Mayodan Police Department; denying [27] Motion and Supporting Brief Requesting Pretrial Status Conference for Discovery Matter; granting [28] Motion to Quash Discovery Requests, or in the alternative, to Stay Discovery by Brian David Hill. (mlh)

This whole appeal boils down to to three major issues, (1)whether a criminal defendant has a right to the discovery materials after a false guilty plea agreement using the FOIA mechanism as a vehicle, (2)whether a criminal defendant should have a right to prove actual innocence, and (3)should FOIA exemptions apply to a legitimate and verified criminal defendant that only wants to overturn a conviction via collateral attack?




posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 02:42 AM
link   
Judge Kiser denied Brian's motion for reconsider since his Appeal is still ongoing.

www.archive.org... - Order on Motion for Reconsideration - ORDER denying [37] Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider the Magistrate Judge's Order Under Document #32 and Objections to the Order; Motion, Objections and Memorandum/Brief in Support of This Objection. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 8/22/2017. (mlh)



posted on Aug, 30 2017 @ 06:06 PM
link   
Another Appeal update!

archive.org...

www.archive.org... - INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Appellees Executive Office for United States Attorneys and DOJ. [17-1866] Cheryl Sloan - Upload date: 2017-08-29 19:16:48

So the U.S. Attorney has filed their response brief, right on the same day as the deadline. They did that with the motion to quash as well, and the Government may be starting to make a pattern of filing things right on the day of the deadline, and when I reviewed through the brief, it was only 16 pages (compared to Brian's Appeal brief containing 44 pages, see www.archive.org...). The appeal had some errors and some claims cannot be verified as truthful, such as the Government's claim that "but now claims that his confession was coerced." That isn't true as his criminal case files (Link: archive.org...) show that Brian has filed multiple pro se motions in 2014-2015 stating that he was coerced to confess, that he had gave a false confession.

So the Government is grasping for straws here, not the other way around. Brian knows exactly what was used against him, and it is a pile of Bull$#it, horse manure. The Government cannot even make false claims right. Brian keeps catching the Government to either be wrong or are liars. They are being habitual liars. They know they are Obama holdovers, like Joe Arpaio and Trump were talking about. The fact that Obama holdovers cannot even write a very well researched and well calculated appeal response brief is a sign that Brian may soon be able to overturn his conviction and get off of that sex offender registry.

It is no longer a matter of if Brian is found innocent, it is a matter of when, what year, and what day will Brian finally be free of his wrongful conviction.

It is an honor to be friends with somebody that didn't just decide to be a coward and die. He fought against a great and powerful foe with virtually unlimited resources from us tax payers. He has never settled with Righthavel, LLC, when others did during the copyright troll lawsuit.

To think they could set him up with child porn, was a big mistake on their part. Now Brian will graduate himself as a self teaching lawyer. Brian didn't have to go to Harvard Law School to become as good as he has. He is learning law on his own by fighting his case.

Hopefully this sends a message to the stinken Feds: DON'T FRAME UP US WITH CHILD PORN OR WE WILL FIGHT BACK AND WIN AT JURY TRIALS!!!!!

We will not tolerate anybody planting child porn on our computers, we will not tolerate it. We will fight back and prove our innocence. We will not be set up by the pedophile rings of the elite child sacrificing satanists. We will not bow down to Satan, that is a promise. The New World Order will fall, the humanity force will defeat em'. The answer to 1984 is 1776.



posted on Sep, 5 2017 @ 06:34 PM
link   
The Appellant-Plaintiff Brian D. Hill has finally filed a informal reply brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

www.archive.org... - INFORMAL REPLY BRIEF by Appellant Brian David Hill. [17-1866] (RW) - 2017-09-05

It looks like Brian has brought up that the U.S. Attorney is putting up false facts as fact.

It appears that the U.S. Attorney is either being an habitual liar, or they aren't doing any research into any of the evidence that they had received from Brian Hill regarding him being framed with child porn, and needs his discovery in order to prove frame up.

The more the Government lies about their criminal defendant Brian David Hill, the more that he may be able to turn his wrongful conviction around, allow the usage of the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") to prove actual innocence under Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States. and he can put a stop to the stigma surrounding Brian Hill's criminal charge.

Part of the reason Brian gave a false confession and falsely plead guilty is the stigma surrounding such criminal charges concerning any sex crimes including simple possession which can be fabricated on a computer connected to the internet using Windows, Apple, and any other Operating System with backdoors for hackers. No lawyer wants to protect him from harm, nobody wants to protect him from verbal abuse and bullying over his criminal charge, and nobody wants to prove his innocence because they will be called "pedophile supporters" or "pedophile sympathizers".

We need to start resisting our primitive emotions and instincts when hearing a possession case involving a computer since anybody can be framed. Instead we need to consider arresting and convicting child porn producers, those that cannot possibly be set up at all.

Production cannot possibly have any doubt or reason to believe frame up, unless the production claim is just some cop claiming there is a video tape but the video cannot be found and the Detective says there is no video when that very detective claims there is a video but cannot prove it to the Court.

Possession is the easiest thing to frame people on. Anybody can email child porn. Anybody can upload child porn through some person's hacked Wifi router. Anybody can use CIA tools like Vault-7, Marble, etc etc, to plant child porn then call the police on enemies after the dirty deed is done.

Mens Rea should be allowed in all child porn cases across America and around the world. We need to prove that the suspect did indeed download child porn and has done so to collect that sick material. That should be all needed to prove the crime allegations. If there is no real evidence, if there is nothing that proves the claim by the Government, then Juries need to find those people not guilty depending on a case-by-case basis.

We need to not just get angry over a allegation, then want to instantly beat up, hate, make fun of, bully, or even considering kill anybody over
just a mere possession allegation. Just like cops planting drugs. Pedophiles inside of Federal Courts, and law enforcement agencies. Pedophiles in District Attorney positions. Possession charges are way too easy to be abused when we do not allow Mens Rea.



posted on Sep, 6 2017 @ 05:23 PM
link   
Brian just filed more evidence with the U.S. District Court with further proof that the U.S. Attorney has made a incorrect, false, or dishonest statement before the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Lying to the U.S. Court of Appeals will not help win the case. The U.S. Attorney Obama Holdover thugs of Greensboro don't care about giving false statements to the Court. They are just lying to the Court, breaking laws, and violating Brian David Hill's Brady rights under Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States, 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

They repay Brian's lawsuit with just more lies and falsehoods. I am getting so sick of how they are conducting their business in our Federal Courts. So much tax dollars wasted with Brian fighting against the liars and thugs in Greensboro, North Carolina.

What ever happened to Moral prosecution? The U.S. Attorney Office of Greensboro, NC with Obama holdovers have no morals.

Here are the filings:

RECAP archive can be accessed here: archive.org...

www.archive.org... - Document #39 - Declaration in Support of Document #2 Complaint, and New Evidence Concerning Possible Dishonesty of the U.S. Attorney Office of Greensboro, North Carolina by Brian David Hill. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(mlh)

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 1

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 2

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 3

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 4

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 5

Also a Attorney, named Elizabeth Beck Lee, whom appeared on the Alex Jones Show, has ReTweeted by tweets on twitter regarding "Justice for Brian D. Hill" campaign.

Tweet #1: twitter.com...

Tweet #2: twitter.com...



posted on Sep, 13 2017 @ 11:42 PM
link   
EVERYBODY!!!! Brian D. Hill has appeared on Owen Shroyer's WAR ROOM by Infowars.

USWGO Alternative News Brian D. Hill appeared on Owen Shroyer's WAR ROOM @allidoisowen to talk about FOIA, frame up

33 Minutes into the video above and you will see Brian coming out of the stigma shadows to finally show his intent to prove his innocence and point to Berger as his enemy.

www.youtube.com... - Link goes directly to 33 minutes into the video.

Twitter Tweet: twitter.com...

The ball is rolling. Brian's PR debacle WAR on the Phil Berger family in Rockingham County North Carolina has publicly begun. The Phil Berger family or somebody connected to them (Detective Robert Bridge whom investigated Brian, his sister Melanie Bridge was Assistant District Attorney whom at the time was Phil Berger Junior) may have set him up and there needs to be an FBI investigation.

Even U.S. Congressman Mark Walker of North Carolina (republican) called for a investigation into possible money laundering of the Phil Berger family political campaign funds, and yet the FBI did absolutely nothing about it. The Greensboro, NC FBI said that Brian was guilty because he had confessed (falsely) to the crime and taken the guilty plea. The FBI failed to review over any evidence that proves his entire confession to be false. The FBI in Greensboro is a fraud. They are protecting the Phil Berger family. A FBI office in a different state needs to thoroughly investigate the entire Berger family for Brian David Hill being framed and find any evidence that may prove it unless there isn't any at this point.

Brian tried to physically visit the FBI office in Roanoke, VA at the BB&T building, and they shoed him away like Brian doesn't have the right to call for a criminal investigation into him being set up with child porn.

Brian is ready for information war, he is ready to die, to end up a martyr if that is what it takes to prove his innocence. Brian has vowed to fight to prove his innocence until he succeeds or ends up dead. Phil Berger doesn't know who he is dealing with. Robert Bridge doesn't know who he was dealing with and his sister on Phil Berger Jr.'s payroll and Berger endorsed Melanie Bridge to be the next Rockingham County DA. What a bunch of corrupt sons of bitches. pardon my french.
edit on 14-9-2017 by StanleyBolten because: none



posted on Sep, 25 2017 @ 05:23 PM
link   
New filing came in:

RECAP Docket: www.archive.org...

RECAP page: archive.org...

Document #40 is the latest and is all about US Attorney reacts to Brian appearing for 4 minutes on Infowars, War Room show.

Additional Evidence - Plaintiff's Declaration in Support of Document [2] Complaint, and New Evidence Concerning New FOIA Document Release from Defendant EOUSA 1 Day After Call-In Appearance on INFOWARS New Show "War Room" with Owen Shroyer by Brian David Hill. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - 2 DVD discs (3 copies), # (2) Exhibit 2 - 9/13/17 Letter and enclosures from Kevin Krebs, Assistant Director, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Incident/Investigation Report, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Case Supplemental Report, # (5) Envelope and Certified Mail Receipt) NOTE: DVDs are available for viewing in Clerk's Office.(ham) - Additional Evidence - www.archive.org...

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 1 - 2 DVD discs (3 copies)


www.archive.org... - Exhibit 2 - 9/13/17 Letter and enclosures from Kevin Krebs, Assistant Director,

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 3 - Incident/Investigation Report

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 4 - Case Supplemental Report

www.archive.org... - Envelope and Certified Mail Receipt

The video below is what was filed, at least the part where Brian called in:
www.youtube.com...

Jon Bowne of Infowars has also started to investigate this:

gab.ai... - "Ok, i've got 4 open. I'll bookmark them, but i'll start reading tonight. Thanks!"

gab.ai... - "We're glad he did and glad he was able to talk to Owen. Has he talked to David Knight? David's new show is called, Real News. www.youtube.com... Jon is not currently in studio. I'm making him aware of all of this though."

So Infowars staff is starting to investigate this and are acknowledging this.

One article by Infowars is all it takes, and the US Attorney will start panicking and pushing for his acquittal before Brian files his 2255 Motion to prevent Brian from proving that Phil Berger and his whole attorney/politician family was inappropriately connected to and involved with Brian's entire criminal case. They don't want frame up victim Brian D. Hill to have justice.

So he needs the media now since he cannot afford justice and they are blocking him from justice. Not just about whether he can afford it or not. They won't even let him see his discovery. They don't want Brian to prove anything. Brian's constitutional rights for his criminal case were all entirely violated and deprived. Brian's criminal conviction is unlawful and unconstitutional.

If they continue stonewalling him and refuses to let him prove his actual innocence, then he should be acquitted on those grounds.

The U.S. Government needs to let Brian prove his innocence or they need to acquit Brian or the Court needs to rule his conviction to being illegal via Writ of Habeas Corpus.



posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 01:08 AM
link   
Bad News guys!

The U.S. Court of Appeals dismissed Brian's appeal and are refusing to protect Brian's constitutional rights which were deprived thanks to the corrupt U.S. Attorney of Greensboro, NC, and the Mayodan Police, as well as the State Bureau of Investigation.

They didn't just ruined Brian's rights to getting access to his criminal discovery records but they made sure that their opinion was unpublished so that no mainstream media will ever cover this.

They wrecked Brian's appeal.

archive.org...

www.archive.org... - USCA Memorandum Opinion from 4th Circuit re: [33] Notice of Interlocutory Appeal; dismissing; decided on 10/19/2017. (mlh)

www.archive.org... - USCA JUDGMENT as to [33] Notice of Interlocutory Appeal filed by Brian David Hill. (mlh)

from archive.org...

JUDGMENT ORDER filed. Disposition method: 17-1866 opn.u.sub. Decision: Dismissed. Originating case number: 4:17-cv-00027-JLK-RSB. Entered on Docket Date: 10/19/2017. [1000176616] Copies to all parties and the district court. Mailed to: Brian Hill. [17-1866] (RW) - www.archive.org...

www.archive.org...

The U.S. Court of Appeals is the most corrupt ever.
It is now time that we all start sending emails to the U.S. Attorney office to criticize them for not letting Brian prove his innocence and blocking him from his Brady/Giglio right to discovery evidence when accused of a serious crime.

All of his Constitutional rights, including the right to Notice and Hearing, was also violated and deprived.

So it is okay to make an innocent man a sex offender after child porn was planted on his computer. It is okay to ruin political activists


www.youtube.com...

1 hour and 54 minutes into the video, Brian had called in from North Carolina.

Brian called into the Alex Jones show on March 11, 2012, to try to persuade any Infowarriors to head to the James A. Collins municipal building to have a lot of support against the Agenda 21 plan. Brian spoke at the Mayodan town council a day later on March 12, 2012.

So Brian did have a history with the Infowars people and other alternative media which includes FederalJack, ActivistPost, Darrin McBreen and Aaron Dykes as well as Richard Reeves which was one of the producers there. Brian was politically character assassinated and all of his Constitutional rights have been officially deprived by corrupt Federal Judges.



posted on Oct, 20 2017 @ 01:35 AM
link   
Now it is time that people start sending emails to the Assistant U.S. Attorney that has successfully helped ruin Brian's life and are blocking him from the very criminal case evidence that will help to prove actual innocence via affirmative defense of frame up.

You may criticize her, call her corrupt and crooked, tell her that she is not morally in the right. You can tell her whatever you want as long as it is legal and lawful. The contact information on one of the corrupt U.S. Attorney staff is below. Brian has told his friends that he is not playing games and is done with the games that the U.S. Attorney has done against him. Brian will not continue tolerating being treated like a pedophile while being blocked from proving his innocence. Brian will be filing hundreds of pages more evidence and call for the removal of the U.S. Attorney from Brian's criminal case. They are too corrupt and are breaking laws to keep Brian on the sex offender registry when there is a lot of evidence that points towards his innocence. Protest, send her any petitions, be a true peaceful activist when you send any emails to Ms. Sloan. She is a corrupt Assistant U.S. Attorney and is protecting the other corrupt employees there that are blocking Brian David Hill from proving his factual innocence. Of course the corrupt Federal Judges are also to blame, but the Judges weren't the ones that used evidence manufactured by corrupt law enforcement. It was the U.S. Attorney that had introduced invalid evidence to coerce a false guilty plea. So the U.S. Attorney is the blame for all of the suffering and suicidal thoughts of Brian Hill. Why is Cheryl Sloan and Anand Prakash Ramaswamy not sitting in prison? Jeff Sessions needs to quit ignoring Brian and need to take action against the corrupt U.S. Attorneys and the corrupt Federal Judges protecting them as if they are god, as if they are royalty.

Disclaimer: All emails should in fact be legal and lawful, no threats, no unlawful conduct. I will not be held responsible if you go too far and you are responsible for whatever you send in an email to Cheryl Thornton Sloan of the U.S. Attorney office in Greensboro, NC. The email is public and is on public court record. Whatever you email or call her about is your responsibility, so please keep it legal and lawful. You may call her corrupt, you may even call her a criminal for the laws being violated here, but keep it lawful to be protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Ask her questions like any member of the press would.

Cheryl Thornton Sloan
Cheryl.Sloan@usdoj.gov
Assistant U. S. Attorney
Middle District of North Carolina, Greensboro division
Direct: 336-333-5351

In fact you may phone call her and leave voicemails. Just all start calling by the hundreds and thousands of people that need to criticize that witch bitch that won't let Brian prove his innocence, as if they are god and can judge Brian as a guilty pedophile sex offender when the evidence being covered up, that they covered up, would have caused Brian to be found not guilty by a Jury or raise any facts of actual innocence which is far stronger than a reasonable doubt being raised at trial.
edit on 20-10-2017 by StanleyBolten because: none



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join