It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New FOIA lawsuit Case that may reveal U.S. Attorney corruption

page: 3
11
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 15 2017 @ 08:07 PM
link   
Appeal update!



Appeals Detail
Case Title Brian Hill v. EOUSA
Circuit Fourth
Case Number 17-1866
Date Filed 2017-07-25
Date Closed
Party BRIAN DAVID HILL (Plaintiff - Appellant)
Party EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, EOUSA (Defendant - Appellee)
Party UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DOJ (Defendant - Appellee)
District Case VAW 4:2017cv00027
Documents Appeal Docket

archive.org...

Informal Appeal Brief entered by Plaintiff earlier on today.

www.archive.org... - INFORMAL OPENING BRIEF by Appellant Brian David Hill. [17-1866] (RW)

It appears that a lot of case law was used in this one.

The U.S. Attorney is claiming that Brian has no right to the law enforcement reports including his very own false confession audio due to exemptions under the FOIA law.

Brian has stated under Oath that he needs the evidence to cross reference and prove his actual innocence. He has asserted his rights under the 14th Amendment under Brady v. Maryland, and even Giglio v. United States.

He is asking that the exemptions not apply to the very criminal defendant requesting records on himself for the sole purpose of getting off the sex offender registry of Virginia and prove his actual innocence.

If the Court of Appeals grants his request for relief, then criminal defendants within the Fourth Circuit judicial district courts may be able to file lawsuits under FOIA as well, and re-request access to their own criminal discovery evidence packets of the very evidence that was used in the Grand Jury proceedings.

Brian isn't just screaming Infowars like I had thought. He has thoroughly planned to change the FOIA law to respect a criminal Defendant's constitutional right to prove innocence under the adversarial system and overturn wrongful convictions of innocent men and women forced into guilty pleas.

Back to here: archive.org...

archive.org... - Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider the Magistrate Judge's Order Under Document #32 and Objections to the Order; Motion, Objections and Memorandum/Brief in Support of This Objection re: [32] Order denying [4] Motion Under Rule 45 Asking the Clerk to Subpoena Attorney John Scott Coalter for Discovery and to Prove the Factual Matter Under Complaint; denying [19] Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas to Produce Documents and Subpoenas to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action; denying issuance of [20] Proposed Subpoena to Town of Mayodan Police Department; denying [27] Motion and Supporting Brief Requesting Pretrial Status Conference for Discovery Matter; granting [28] Motion to Quash Discovery Requests, or in the alternative, to Stay Discovery by Brian David Hill. (mlh)

This whole appeal boils down to to three major issues, (1)whether a criminal defendant has a right to the discovery materials after a false guilty plea agreement using the FOIA mechanism as a vehicle, (2)whether a criminal defendant should have a right to prove actual innocence, and (3)should FOIA exemptions apply to a legitimate and verified criminal defendant that only wants to overturn a conviction via collateral attack?




posted on Aug, 25 2017 @ 02:42 AM
link   
Judge Kiser denied Brian's motion for reconsider since his Appeal is still ongoing.

www.archive.org... - Order on Motion for Reconsideration - ORDER denying [37] Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider the Magistrate Judge's Order Under Document #32 and Objections to the Order; Motion, Objections and Memorandum/Brief in Support of This Objection. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 8/22/2017. (mlh)



posted on Aug, 30 2017 @ 06:06 PM
link   
Another Appeal update!

archive.org...

www.archive.org... - INFORMAL RESPONSE BRIEF by Appellees Executive Office for United States Attorneys and DOJ. [17-1866] Cheryl Sloan - Upload date: 2017-08-29 19:16:48

So the U.S. Attorney has filed their response brief, right on the same day as the deadline. They did that with the motion to quash as well, and the Government may be starting to make a pattern of filing things right on the day of the deadline, and when I reviewed through the brief, it was only 16 pages (compared to Brian's Appeal brief containing 44 pages, see www.archive.org...). The appeal had some errors and some claims cannot be verified as truthful, such as the Government's claim that "but now claims that his confession was coerced." That isn't true as his criminal case files (Link: archive.org...) show that Brian has filed multiple pro se motions in 2014-2015 stating that he was coerced to confess, that he had gave a false confession.

So the Government is grasping for straws here, not the other way around. Brian knows exactly what was used against him, and it is a pile of Bull$#it, horse manure. The Government cannot even make false claims right. Brian keeps catching the Government to either be wrong or are liars. They are being habitual liars. They know they are Obama holdovers, like Joe Arpaio and Trump were talking about. The fact that Obama holdovers cannot even write a very well researched and well calculated appeal response brief is a sign that Brian may soon be able to overturn his conviction and get off of that sex offender registry.

It is no longer a matter of if Brian is found innocent, it is a matter of when, what year, and what day will Brian finally be free of his wrongful conviction.

It is an honor to be friends with somebody that didn't just decide to be a coward and die. He fought against a great and powerful foe with virtually unlimited resources from us tax payers. He has never settled with Righthavel, LLC, when others did during the copyright troll lawsuit.

To think they could set him up with child porn, was a big mistake on their part. Now Brian will graduate himself as a self teaching lawyer. Brian didn't have to go to Harvard Law School to become as good as he has. He is learning law on his own by fighting his case.

Hopefully this sends a message to the stinken Feds: DON'T FRAME UP US WITH CHILD PORN OR WE WILL FIGHT BACK AND WIN AT JURY TRIALS!!!!!

We will not tolerate anybody planting child porn on our computers, we will not tolerate it. We will fight back and prove our innocence. We will not be set up by the pedophile rings of the elite child sacrificing satanists. We will not bow down to Satan, that is a promise. The New World Order will fall, the humanity force will defeat em'. The answer to 1984 is 1776.



posted on Sep, 5 2017 @ 06:34 PM
link   
The Appellant-Plaintiff Brian D. Hill has finally filed a informal reply brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

www.archive.org... - INFORMAL REPLY BRIEF by Appellant Brian David Hill. [17-1866] (RW) - 2017-09-05

It looks like Brian has brought up that the U.S. Attorney is putting up false facts as fact.

It appears that the U.S. Attorney is either being an habitual liar, or they aren't doing any research into any of the evidence that they had received from Brian Hill regarding him being framed with child porn, and needs his discovery in order to prove frame up.

The more the Government lies about their criminal defendant Brian David Hill, the more that he may be able to turn his wrongful conviction around, allow the usage of the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") to prove actual innocence under Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States. and he can put a stop to the stigma surrounding Brian Hill's criminal charge.

Part of the reason Brian gave a false confession and falsely plead guilty is the stigma surrounding such criminal charges concerning any sex crimes including simple possession which can be fabricated on a computer connected to the internet using Windows, Apple, and any other Operating System with backdoors for hackers. No lawyer wants to protect him from harm, nobody wants to protect him from verbal abuse and bullying over his criminal charge, and nobody wants to prove his innocence because they will be called "pedophile supporters" or "pedophile sympathizers".

We need to start resisting our primitive emotions and instincts when hearing a possession case involving a computer since anybody can be framed. Instead we need to consider arresting and convicting child porn producers, those that cannot possibly be set up at all.

Production cannot possibly have any doubt or reason to believe frame up, unless the production claim is just some cop claiming there is a video tape but the video cannot be found and the Detective says there is no video when that very detective claims there is a video but cannot prove it to the Court.

Possession is the easiest thing to frame people on. Anybody can email child porn. Anybody can upload child porn through some person's hacked Wifi router. Anybody can use CIA tools like Vault-7, Marble, etc etc, to plant child porn then call the police on enemies after the dirty deed is done.

Mens Rea should be allowed in all child porn cases across America and around the world. We need to prove that the suspect did indeed download child porn and has done so to collect that sick material. That should be all needed to prove the crime allegations. If there is no real evidence, if there is nothing that proves the claim by the Government, then Juries need to find those people not guilty depending on a case-by-case basis.

We need to not just get angry over a allegation, then want to instantly beat up, hate, make fun of, bully, or even considering kill anybody over
just a mere possession allegation. Just like cops planting drugs. Pedophiles inside of Federal Courts, and law enforcement agencies. Pedophiles in District Attorney positions. Possession charges are way too easy to be abused when we do not allow Mens Rea.



posted on Sep, 6 2017 @ 05:23 PM
link   
Brian just filed more evidence with the U.S. District Court with further proof that the U.S. Attorney has made a incorrect, false, or dishonest statement before the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Lying to the U.S. Court of Appeals will not help win the case. The U.S. Attorney Obama Holdover thugs of Greensboro don't care about giving false statements to the Court. They are just lying to the Court, breaking laws, and violating Brian David Hill's Brady rights under Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States, 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

They repay Brian's lawsuit with just more lies and falsehoods. I am getting so sick of how they are conducting their business in our Federal Courts. So much tax dollars wasted with Brian fighting against the liars and thugs in Greensboro, North Carolina.

What ever happened to Moral prosecution? The U.S. Attorney Office of Greensboro, NC with Obama holdovers have no morals.

Here are the filings:

RECAP archive can be accessed here: archive.org...

www.archive.org... - Document #39 - Declaration in Support of Document #2 Complaint, and New Evidence Concerning Possible Dishonesty of the U.S. Attorney Office of Greensboro, North Carolina by Brian David Hill. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5)(mlh)

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 1

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 2

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 3

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 4

www.archive.org... - Exhibit 5

Also a Attorney, named Elizabeth Beck Lee, whom appeared on the Alex Jones Show, has ReTweeted by tweets on twitter regarding "Justice for Brian D. Hill" campaign.

Tweet #1: twitter.com...

Tweet #2: twitter.com...



posted on Sep, 13 2017 @ 11:42 PM
link   
EVERYBODY!!!! Brian D. Hill has appeared on Owen Shroyer's WAR ROOM by Infowars.

USWGO Alternative News Brian D. Hill appeared on Owen Shroyer's WAR ROOM @allidoisowen to talk about FOIA, frame up

33 Minutes into the video above and you will see Brian coming out of the stigma shadows to finally show his intent to prove his innocence and point to Berger as his enemy.

www.youtube.com... - Link goes directly to 33 minutes into the video.

Twitter Tweet: twitter.com...

The ball is rolling. Brian's PR debacle WAR on the Phil Berger family in Rockingham County North Carolina has publicly begun. The Phil Berger family or somebody connected to them (Detective Robert Bridge whom investigated Brian, his sister Melanie Bridge was Assistant District Attorney whom at the time was Phil Berger Junior) may have set him up and there needs to be an FBI investigation.

Even U.S. Congressman Mark Walker of North Carolina (republican) called for a investigation into possible money laundering of the Phil Berger family political campaign funds, and yet the FBI did absolutely nothing about it. The Greensboro, NC FBI said that Brian was guilty because he had confessed (falsely) to the crime and taken the guilty plea. The FBI failed to review over any evidence that proves his entire confession to be false. The FBI in Greensboro is a fraud. They are protecting the Phil Berger family. A FBI office in a different state needs to thoroughly investigate the entire Berger family for Brian David Hill being framed and find any evidence that may prove it unless there isn't any at this point.

Brian tried to physically visit the FBI office in Roanoke, VA at the BB&T building, and they shoed him away like Brian doesn't have the right to call for a criminal investigation into him being set up with child porn.

Brian is ready for information war, he is ready to die, to end up a martyr if that is what it takes to prove his innocence. Brian has vowed to fight to prove his innocence until he succeeds or ends up dead. Phil Berger doesn't know who he is dealing with. Robert Bridge doesn't know who he was dealing with and his sister on Phil Berger Jr.'s payroll and Berger endorsed Melanie Bridge to be the next Rockingham County DA. What a bunch of corrupt sons of bitches. pardon my french.
edit on 14-9-2017 by StanleyBolten because: none



new topics

 
11
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join