The Appellant-Plaintiff Brian D. Hill has finally filed a informal reply brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
- INFORMAL REPLY BRIEF by Appellant Brian David Hill.
[17-1866] (RW) - 2017-09-05
It looks like Brian has brought up that the U.S. Attorney is putting up false facts as fact.
It appears that the U.S. Attorney is either being an habitual liar, or they aren't doing any research into any of the evidence that they had received
from Brian Hill regarding him being framed with child porn, and needs his discovery in order to prove frame up.
The more the Government lies about their criminal defendant Brian David Hill, the more that he may be able to turn his wrongful conviction around,
allow the usage of the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") to prove actual innocence under Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States. and he can
put a stop to the stigma surrounding Brian Hill's criminal charge.
Part of the reason Brian gave a false confession and falsely plead guilty is the stigma surrounding such criminal charges concerning any sex crimes
including simple possession which can be fabricated on a computer connected to the internet using Windows, Apple, and any other Operating System with
backdoors for hackers. No lawyer wants to protect him from harm, nobody wants to protect him from verbal abuse and bullying over his criminal charge,
and nobody wants to prove his innocence because they will be called "pedophile supporters" or "pedophile sympathizers".
We need to start resisting our primitive emotions and instincts when hearing a possession case involving a computer since anybody can be framed.
Instead we need to consider arresting and convicting child porn producers, those that cannot possibly be set up at all.
Production cannot possibly have any doubt or reason to believe frame up, unless the production claim is just some cop claiming there is a video tape
but the video cannot be found and the Detective says there is no video when that very detective claims there is a video but cannot prove it to the
Possession is the easiest thing to frame people on. Anybody can email child porn. Anybody can upload child porn through some person's hacked Wifi
router. Anybody can use CIA tools like Vault-7, Marble, etc etc, to plant child porn then call the police on enemies after the dirty deed is done.
Mens Rea should be allowed in all child porn cases across America and around the world. We need to prove that the suspect did indeed download child
porn and has done so to collect that sick material. That should be all needed to prove the crime allegations. If there is no real evidence, if there
is nothing that proves the claim by the Government, then Juries need to find those people not guilty depending on a case-by-case basis.
We need to not just get angry over a allegation, then want to instantly beat up, hate, make fun of, bully, or even considering kill anybody over
just a mere possession allegation. Just like cops planting drugs. Pedophiles inside of Federal Courts, and law enforcement agencies. Pedophiles in
District Attorney positions. Possession charges are way too easy to be abused when we do not allow Mens Rea.