It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I believe the house has to actually take a vote to begin the process; the house would not put forward someone for impeachment they were not SURE were guilty would they? You pretend to not know how the process works tho, it is better for your ridiculous argument that way.
Yes there is. Wouldn't want to jump to conclusions like "impeachment" until it is done would you? That cuts both ways.
One would still need that elusive thing called evidence and a majority voote from the house. Trump was smart enough to get the AG and deputy AG to sign off on firing comey. No matter trumps motive his hands are clean, unless you think the AG and deputy AG are in on it.
“And in fact when I decided to just do it, I said to myself, I said, ‘You know, this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story. It’s an excuse by the Democrats for having lost an election that they should have won.'”
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: theantediluvian
What if, and I mean that with emphasis, he knows already that it is bull?
I know what the media says, but if we look at what the POTUS actually says, he has stated that Comey told him as well as Clapper, no investigations.
No investigation = no obstruction. He's not, nor could he stop any investigation to lets say Flynn.