It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
He can't be gay because he has children. People who are gay are not sexually excited by the opposite sex. He may be a bisexual but he's not gay.
That is totally preposterous. My grandfather was gay, yet he had children with my grandmother. He assumed the role of a straight man to avoid the blowback, but he was definitely gay, not bisexual. And I'm sure a politician could assume the role of a Christian, because they know they couldn't be President as a Muslim at this point in history. As the old saying goes, you can't judge a book by it's cover.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Sheye
I guess I do not understand how the conversation switches to be about me. I think anyone who uses the word "ape" to refer to black guy in that way is just wrong. Do you agree?
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: TruMcCarthy
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: TruMcCarthy
He can't be gay because he has children. People who are gay are not sexually excited by the opposite sex. He may be a bisexual but he's not gay.
That is totally preposterous. My grandfather was gay, yet he had children with my grandmother. He assumed the role of a straight man to avoid the blowback, but he was definitely gay, not bisexual. And I'm sure a politician could assume the role of a Christian, because they know they couldn't be President as a Muslim at this point in history. As the old saying goes, you can't judge a book by it's cover.
I have heard multiple gay people say when they were growing up, they just knew they were "different". And that they would not get sexually excited by the opposite sex. The impression that I got was they simple could not have sex with a woman.
originally posted by: XTexan
a reply to: MotherMayEye
How, exactly, would you have stood up for him?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Sheye
I guess I do not understand how the conversation switches to be about me. I think anyone who uses the word "ape" to refer to black guy in that way is just wrong. Do you agree?
Sure do. That's why I would have stood up for Alvin....unlike you who just exploited his story.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Sheye
I guess I do not understand how the conversation switches to be about me. I think anyone who uses the word "ape" to refer to black guy in that way is just wrong. Do you agree?
Sure do. That's why I would have stood up for Alvin....unlike you who just exploited his story.
What do you mean "sure do". Is that a "yes". You agree calling black person an "ape" in a derogatory fashion is not very nice?
Exploitative how just exactly?
I get it you want to label me as exploitative so the discussion becomes about me again.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: XTexan
a reply to: MotherMayEye
How, exactly, would you have stood up for him?
As I already stated...I would have called the guy a d*ckhead and told him to never set foot in my business again. And if I felt so much as slightly threatened, I would have called the police.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: XTexan
a reply to: MotherMayEye
How, exactly, would you have stood up for him?
As I already stated...I would have called the guy a d*ckhead and told him to never set foot in my business again. And if I felt so much as slightly threatened, I would have called the police.
How do you know I didn't? Why are you drawing that conclusion?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Sheye
I guess I do not understand how the conversation switches to be about me. I think anyone who uses the word "ape" to refer to black guy in that way is just wrong. Do you agree?
Sure do. That's why I would have stood up for Alvin....unlike you who just exploited his story.
What do you mean "sure do". Is that a "yes". You agree calling black person an "ape" in a derogatory fashion is not very nice?
Exploitative how just exactly?
I get it you want to label me as exploitative so the discussion becomes about me again.
You wrote:
"I think anyone who uses the word "ape" to refer to black guy in that way is just wrong. Do you agree?"
I wrote:
"Sure do."
Is that not clear?
originally posted by: dfnj2015
a reply to: Sheye
I guess I do not understand how the conversation switches to be about me. I think anyone who uses the word "ape" to refer to black guy in that way is just wrong. Do you agree?
originally posted by: XTexan
a reply to: MotherMayEye
So nothing. You would have called him a name, big deal.
What happened: dfn went outside to speak with the person, heard racially charged language and the guy left.
What you want to have happened: hear the racially charged language and then escalate the situation to a possible physical altercation?
How is that better?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: XTexan
a reply to: MotherMayEye
How, exactly, would you have stood up for him?
As I already stated...I would have called the guy a d*ckhead and told him to never set foot in my business again. And if I felt so much as slightly threatened, I would have called the police.
How do you know I didn't? Why are you drawing that conclusion?
Because you didn't say so when you told the story. And now, if you claim you did something...I cringe because it reads as a flipping lie and more exploitation.