It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Liberals Call for Comey to Resign, Trump Fires Comey, Liberals Outraged

page: 10
84
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: knoxie
2. we'll lose freedoms like the sheep in Russia... the right won't care.

*YAWN*

Trump hasn't done that yet, Obama sure did. Look in the mirror.




posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:43 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04


i'm sorry you lost freedoms under Obama, bless your heart in two, life must be so hard for you now... my bad.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:43 AM
link   
Trump successful:

Triggering the Triggerables

When will "people" figure this out?




posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I'm not suggesting it was anti Trump fake news, I'm suggesting that claims and suppositions plus unnamed sources never equal fact without, you know, facts.

You seem to be flip flopping. They presented it as fact, but it's not fact, and it's not fake news. So if it's REAL news, and not fake news, then when Trump tweets similar things his tweets must be very valid .. since, you know, REAL news was saying very similar things.


What Trump tweets is his business, he rants what he likes, why should I care? You said you had provided a page full of proof, you didn't - that's why I made my comment. Careful getting off that high horse, wouldn't like you to hurt yourself.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:45 AM
link   
To be fair, the liberals were cheering when the news broke, until they were prompted that Comey's firing was 'bad'.


edit on 10-5-2017 by GodEmperor because: grammar



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: uncommitted

I have yet to see a single piece of evidence wikileaks got their intel from Russia. That is based on a 2 step process of logical thinking.

1. There is no real evidence the hacking was even done by Russia.
2. Hacking being done by Russia =/= they are the wikileaks source.

Now we know for a fact Hillary broke the law.

Again, the problem is that in January liberal media outlets were writing stories and everyone found it sane and reasonable. Fast forward 2 months, Trump tweets something very similar, and all of a sudden it's crazy talk.


Evidence of the hacking is part of the investigation Comey has just been sacked from, no? Trump is meeting the Russian foreign minister at the White House tomorrow - you know that, right? And you don't have any feeling that the timing and the reasoning for the firing is a little suspicious? Course you don't.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I'm not suggesting it was anti Trump fake news, I'm suggesting that claims and suppositions plus unnamed sources never equal fact without, you know, facts.

You seem to be flip flopping. They presented it as fact, but it's not fact, and it's not fake news. So if it's REAL news, and not fake news, then when Trump tweets similar things his tweets must be very valid .. since, you know, REAL news was saying very similar things.


What Trump tweets is his business, he rants what he likes, why should I care? You said you had provided a page full of proof, you didn't - that's why I made my comment. Careful getting off that high horse, wouldn't like you to hurt yourself.

Maybe you missed the part where I showed the sources saying it was confirmed and verified and posted it as fact. I didn't miss it.

Either way, I did provide a full page of proof, as the argument you butted into was someone saying the Media did not say anything about this until after Trump did in March.

So my sources in January are literal proof that the media was reporting this before Trump said anything.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: AlexandrosTheGreat

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I'm not suggesting it was anti Trump fake news, I'm suggesting that claims and suppositions plus unnamed sources never equal fact without, you know, facts.


Just for the record, I believe the Trump campaign was being helped by Russia. I don't believe the Clinton email 'scandal' should have been judged as anything other than it has already been judged, but I wouldn't believe something based on opinion and unnamed sources regardless of whom is the target.


My thought is SO WHAT...Hillary received hundreds of millions from countless nations (none of who have donated to her "charity" since) and its silly to think they didn't use every avenue they had aavailable in the US to ensure their connections got her votes so their payments paid off. Why does everyone focus on this when we KNOW Hillary is WAYYYY guilty of it to like...a sickening extent


Sickening? I give you the Trump university and the Trump foundation. The phrase 'it's silly to think that' = 'I can't prove anything but'. More opinion.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: GodEmperor
To be fair, the liberals were cheering when the news broke, until they were prompted that Comey's firing was 'bad'.



Colbert is not even funny anymore. When you constantly cut down someone on a nightly basis it no longer is considered comedy. He is a hateful and negative person and from what I can see people in the audience are just stupid, mindless followers.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: uncommitted

I have yet to see a single piece of evidence wikileaks got their intel from Russia. That is based on a 2 step process of logical thinking.

1. There is no real evidence the hacking was even done by Russia.
2. Hacking being done by Russia =/= they are the wikileaks source.

Now we know for a fact Hillary broke the law.

Again, the problem is that in January liberal media outlets were writing stories and everyone found it sane and reasonable. Fast forward 2 months, Trump tweets something very similar, and all of a sudden it's crazy talk.


Evidence of the hacking is part of the investigation Comey has just been sacked from, no? Trump is meeting the Russian foreign minister at the White House tomorrow - you know that, right? And you don't have any feeling that the timing and the reasoning for the firing is a little suspicious? Course you don't.

Comey is not the investigation. In fact, it's literally impossible for this to be the case. Want to know why? The FBI never investigated the hacking. The DNC paid a 3rd party to 'investigate' and then tell the FBI what happened. The FBI never even tried to do their own fair and impartial investigation.

So the FBI is literally going by what the Democrats have told them concerning Trump and Russia. Let that sink in.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: uncommitted

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

I'm not suggesting it was anti Trump fake news, I'm suggesting that claims and suppositions plus unnamed sources never equal fact without, you know, facts.

You seem to be flip flopping. They presented it as fact, but it's not fact, and it's not fake news. So if it's REAL news, and not fake news, then when Trump tweets similar things his tweets must be very valid .. since, you know, REAL news was saying very similar things.


What Trump tweets is his business, he rants what he likes, why should I care? You said you had provided a page full of proof, you didn't - that's why I made my comment. Careful getting off that high horse, wouldn't like you to hurt yourself.

Maybe you missed the part where I showed the sources saying it was confirmed and verified and posted it as fact. I didn't miss it.

Either way, I did provide a full page of proof, as the argument you butted into was someone saying the Media did not say anything about this until after Trump did in March.

So my sources in January are literal proof that the media was reporting this before Trump said anything.


Sorry, I'm not sure why I really care, but I didn't see a NAMED source confirming anything. Did I miss something? I mean a source in a position to state a fact, not that in their opinion its fact. The sad thing is, I probably agree with at least part of your premise, I picked you up on the quality of the sources that you were calling fact - no more, no less. You might want to cut down on the coffee.,



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:56 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah, it's crazy when different people have different opinions that appear contrary to the boxes and labels we put them in because understanding individual opinions is too much work.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: 0zzymand0s

No, same people, flip flopping. Like Schumer.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 10:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Trump successful:

Triggering the Triggerables

When will "people" figure this out?




He the fking President and you're okay with him being a troll.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 10:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74

originally posted by: xuenchen
Trump successful:

Triggering the Triggerables

When will "people" figure this out?




He the fking President and you're okay with him being a troll.

He's being bipartisan. Democrats wanted Comey gone too, or so they said.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 10:07 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

So say Schumer and not "liberal" or "conservative?"



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 10:12 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Yes, some did. However, it's a false narrative that Liberals and Democrats are now mad just because it's something Trump did. Obama should have fired Comey, because it would have been equally wrong for Hillary to fire him.

Trump fired the man leading the investigation into POSSIBLE ties between his campaign and Russians. Every American should want these questions answered, definitively... not dismissed out hand because the talking heads tell you it's just because people are salty that Trump won.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 10:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74

originally posted by: xuenchen
Trump successful:

Triggering the Triggerables

When will "people" figure this out?




He the fking President and you're okay with him being a troll.


That's the new standard.

To be completely honest, Trump cultists were excited and thought it would be a good idea for a pornstar to be hired by Trump to work in his cabinet.

Partisan sheep have no standards as long as it's their colored fleece.



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 10:15 AM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire

Well if the porn star is qualified, why not. I get your point though.
edit on 5/10/2017 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 10 2017 @ 10:16 AM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The Clinton investigation has concluded. Trump isn't calling for reopening it and I'm not certain that he could but I could be wrong.




top topics



 
84
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join