It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: marg6043
Oh my god what in the heck is going on with the democrats, these people are completely on some kind of Hallucinogen or they ran out of Xanax, They got to be kidding, some guy or Democratic strategist, call Mustaffa, came out on the news saying that Trump have no right to fired Comey, that he didn't have the right to fired Yates, because all those people were investigating Trump, now Yates? really, Yates? since when Yates was appointed to investigate Trump.
This just something you will read in a bad comedy show.
Trump is the president, but democrats think that Trump have not rights as the president, because they say so.
How dare Trump fired the frogs that Obama the toad appointed under his administration.
Darn democrats are losing their minds, can somebody give this people some anti depressants.
This is the misinformation and crap they are feeding people that believe on them and then no wonder we come here on ATS and can not even get a nice debate on this issues, because people actually believe what these democratic agents on agendas are saying.
Un freaking believable.
I had not clue Yates was investigating Trump too.
Yeah I just saw that too, it was pathetic. They really have come unhinged. They don't realize they're driving reasonable people away from their party and Independents can't stand it.
I do not believe you would recognize "reasonable people" if your life depended on it.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: face23785
I can not believe this what they feeding their followers, they are actually telling people that Trump as the president doesn't have rights like Obama did or any other president before him.
This is worst than brainwashing, this is creating the ride mode for those that are gullible or that do not understand Americans politics to get up and start rioting.
What is this people thinking, I mean of what ever have become of the democrat leadership.
This beyond losing an election, this an agenda and an ugly one.
originally posted by: SBMcG
I know the current narrative coming from the Left is that Trump fired Comey to derail the FBI investigation into any potential collusion between his campaign and "the Russians".
Even though pretty much everyone who would know says there's no evidence of that, and even leftist icon Dianne Feinstein says that there is no investigation into President Trump himself, let's assume for a moment that there is at least something there.
In that case, why didn't Obama use that against Trump long before the November election?
Obama has a long history of spying on his political opponents going back to his Senate run in 2004 (Jack Ryan's leaked divorce settlement). Since then, he has used the IRS to spy on and harass conservative groups, spied on the heads of state of some of our closest allies, wiretapped AMERICAN reporters from the AP to Fox's James Rosen (and his family), and very likely spied on Team Trump during the campaign.
If there were something there, why didn't Obama use it to help Bill Clinton's wife? He had to know that a "President" Trump would literally erase his entire legacy -- which he is well on his way to doing. He had to know that if Trump won, the odds of continued investigations in the Clinton's and even the Obama Regime itself would be likely.
Again, was this another massive Obama screw-up or was there in fact simply nothing there?
The same thing is true in regard to Trump's tax returns. If there were anything there, it strains credulity that Obama would not have arranged to have those negative items leak out.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra
But in this case Loretta Lynch has recused herself from the investigation because of the meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Atlanta. Remember? I could be wrong but I thought she had passed that responsibility on to Comey.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra
But in this case Loretta Lynch has recused herself from the investigation because of the meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in Atlanta. Remember? I could be wrong but I thought she had passed that responsibility on to Comey.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: SBMcG
The only thing that makes sense to me is no one in DC thought for one second he could beat the Annoited One.
Surprise!
TheRedneck
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: SBMcG
I know the current narrative coming from the Left is that Trump fired Comey to derail the FBI investigation into any potential collusion between his campaign and "the Russians".
Even though pretty much everyone who would know says there's no evidence of that, and even leftist icon Dianne Feinstein says that there is no investigation into President Trump himself, let's assume for a moment that there is at least something there.
In that case, why didn't Obama use that against Trump long before the November election?
Obama has a long history of spying on his political opponents going back to his Senate run in 2004 (Jack Ryan's leaked divorce settlement). Since then, he has used the IRS to spy on and harass conservative groups, spied on the heads of state of some of our closest allies, wiretapped AMERICAN reporters from the AP to Fox's James Rosen (and his family), and very likely spied on Team Trump during the campaign.
If there were something there, why didn't Obama use it to help Bill Clinton's wife? He had to know that a "President" Trump would literally erase his entire legacy -- which he is well on his way to doing. He had to know that if Trump won, the odds of continued investigations in the Clinton's and even the Obama Regime itself would be likely.
Again, was this another massive Obama screw-up or was there in fact simply nothing there?
The same thing is true in regard to Trump's tax returns. If there were anything there, it strains credulity that Obama would not have arranged to have those negative items leak out.
Whoa whoa, easy on the logic there buddy. The narrative isn't based on logic.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: marg6043
Oh my god what in the heck is going on with the democrats, these people are completely on some kind of Hallucinogen or they ran out of Xanax, They got to be kidding, some guy or Democratic strategist, call Mustaffa, came out on the news saying that Trump have no right to fired Comey, that he didn't have the right to fired Yates, because all those people were investigating Trump, now Yates? really, Yates? since when Yates was appointed to investigate Trump.
This just something you will read in a bad comedy show.
Trump is the president, but democrats think that Trump have not rights as the president, because they say so.
How dare Trump fired the frogs that Obama the toad appointed under his administration.
Darn democrats are losing their minds, can somebody give this people some anti depressants.
This is the misinformation and crap they are feeding people that believe on them and then no wonder we come here on ATS and can not even get a nice debate on this issues, because people actually believe what these democratic agents on agendas are saying.
Un freaking believable.
I had not clue Yates was investigating Trump too.
Yeah I just saw that too, it was pathetic. They really have come unhinged. They don't realize they're driving reasonable people away from their party and Independents can't stand it.
I do not believe you would recognize "reasonable people" if your life depended on it.
A reasonable person doesn't doubt the Deputy AG and his appointed spokesperson being in agreement and instead puts his faith in an anonymous source because it agrees with his biased partisan false narrative. Try again little buddy.