It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“Acting FBI director contradicts White House” is now dominating headlines across the media. Of course, it’s only half the story. When Andrew McCabe, the acting director of the FBI, testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee today, he not only contradicted what the administration had been saying about firing of James Comey but also nearly every anonymously-sourced scoop that dominated coverage yesterday.
Most reporting on McCabe’s testimony focused on the fact that he undercut the White House’s assertion that dissention among the FBI’s rank and file precipitated the firing of Comey. Need it be repeated, the administration’s case – that the director was fired for his unprofessional actions towards Hillary Clinton – is risible. In fact, watching the interim FBI director sit in front of a Senate committee plainly debunking Trump’s core justification for the dismissal is just another reason to view yesterday’s reaction as needlessly hysterical.
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Xcathdra
I got it, no reason needed. if you think no reason is a good reason, well...
originally posted by: Gandalf77
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: face23785
ya, too bad there are so many videos of trump praising comey... but but Hillary's emails. lol
and, that's were we differ, I believe he HAS done something legitimately wrong. there are current ongoing investigations so i'm not the only one.
Since it is a CI investigation, if any criminal conduct is found, at some point they would have to open a criminal investigation. It's been 10 months and that hasn't happened yet. It's not likely they've found much if anything, since they haven't begun a criminal investigation yet.
That is a good point for sure. If I can play devil's advocate for a moment, would we know if they had in fact launched a criminal investigation? To be clear, I doubt they have. The safer money says they're still crunching a pile of data, following up on leads gleaned from whatever intel they received, etc. For example, if Clapper's correct that the potential for shady business deals has come into scope since the initial assessment, that adds a significantly complex dimension to the investigation.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: Gandalf77
To add further to your complex investigation comment... If they find irregular trump business deals the "illegality" would need to be determined and then forwarded to the appropriate investigative body. Finding business irregularities, as an example, between trump and russia does not mean its intelligence or counter intelligence related. Its possible to stumble across wrong doing that the IRS would have to investigate that has nothing to do with russia collusion.
Another thing the left cant seem to grasp and even then the crime might not even involve trump but people in is business.
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: face23785
you believe Obama fired him for hurting feelings, yet you can't fathom the idea that trump might have fired comey because of the investigation.. really?
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Xcathdra
I got it, no reason needed. if you think no reason is a good reason, well...
Fire-at-will laws are what people in 49 states have to work under. if it's good enough for us, then I don't see why Comey should be an exception.
Link
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: face23785
I do think trump is THAT stupid. LOL
not having a replacement, shows to me, it was a desperate move by a desperate man. my opinion.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: face23785
I do think trump is THAT stupid. LOL
not having a replacement, shows to me, it was a desperate move by a desperate man. my opinion.
If Trump is as stupid as people claim what does that say about Clinton, who lost to him and Democrats, who lost a lot over the last 8 years.
As for your comment about a replacement -
If you are stabbed you dont pull the knife out as it can cause more damage than if you left it in place where it corks some of the blood flow. However there are times when you have to remove the knife or the person will die.