It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
I don't get it...does it matter why he fired him? He can fire him for any reason other than race, gender, sexual orientation, etc...
I guess I am not seeing why it even matters and is worth probing.
He can fire the Director of FBI for any reason?...Sure..Though the only other time it was done, the Dir. was using tax payer funds for home improvement and lied on tax returns etc.
Obstructing or attempting to obstruct Justice is illegal...
Where those two actions intersect is what got Nixon impeached following the Saturday Night Massacre where Nixon fired his AG and Deputy AG when they refused to fire the Special Prosecutor investigating him.
Interesting Side Note:
Trump Friend/advisor/subject of FBI investigation...Roger Stone was a Nixon Advisor and loyalist. He even got a picture of Nixon Tattooed on his back after the scandal..
The ardently Democrat acting Director of the FBI just testified to Congress that the Bureau's investigation into Trump/Russia will not be impacted in any way by Comey being fired. He further testified that no special prosecutor is needed.
Narrative busted.
What narrative? And how was it "busted"?
Confused by your posts..
Lol so now you're gonna play dumb? Your pretending you don't know what I mean is pathetic and childish. The narrative that Trump fired Comey to obstruct the investigation is false and you know it's false yet you still continue to dishonestly insinuate it. Stop lying.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
Ah, so you are saying he was perhaps attempting to obstruct justice. But the FBI would still be investigating, even with Comey gone though? So that seems a huge stretch to me.
It wasn't Comey doing the investigating, it's the FBI.
That is certainly an argument being sold...But where does that end? As long as the FBI has one agent assigned to the case he can fire away?
If clear intent to impede the investigation by removing the Head of the FBI is demonstrated?
Is the argument that the head of the FBI is irrelevant to the FBI's work? Or does "obstruction of justice" only stick when it is proven successful? Attempted murder?
I would argue that anyone convicted of "Obstruction of Justice"...was obviously unsuccessful given their conviction.
So the defense that the FBI is still investigating is irrelevant.
It was just testified to Congress that no one has been removed from the investigation. Stop making things up.
You should Google the name James Comey?
He wasn't the investigating agent. The dozens of agents who actually were doing the investigation are still doing it. That was just confirmed to Congress in public. Keep it up with the false narrative though. It's sad.
originally posted by: Gandalf77
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
I don't get it...does it matter why he fired him? He can fire him for any reason other than race, gender, sexual orientation, etc...
I guess I am not seeing why it even matters and is worth probing.
He can fire the Director of FBI for any reason?...Sure..Though the only other time it was done, the Dir. was using tax payer funds for home improvement and lied on tax returns etc.
Obstructing or attempting to obstruct Justice is illegal...
Where those two actions intersect is what got Nixon impeached following the Saturday Night Massacre where Nixon fired his AG and Deputy AG when they refused to fire the Special Prosecutor investigating him.
Interesting Side Note:
Trump Friend/advisor/subject of FBI investigation...Roger Stone was a Nixon Advisor and loyalist. He even got a picture of Nixon Tattooed on his back after the scandal..
The ardently Democrat acting Director of the FBI just testified to Congress that the Bureau's investigation into Trump/Russia will not be impacted in any way by Comey being fired. He further testified that no special prosecutor is needed.
Narrative busted.
What narrative? And how was it "busted"?
Confused by your posts..
Lol so now you're gonna play dumb? Your pretending you don't know what I mean is pathetic and childish. The narrative that Trump fired Comey to obstruct the investigation is false and you know it's false yet you still continue to dishonestly insinuate it. Stop lying.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
Ah, so you are saying he was perhaps attempting to obstruct justice. But the FBI would still be investigating, even with Comey gone though? So that seems a huge stretch to me.
It wasn't Comey doing the investigating, it's the FBI.
That is certainly an argument being sold...But where does that end? As long as the FBI has one agent assigned to the case he can fire away?
If clear intent to impede the investigation by removing the Head of the FBI is demonstrated?
Is the argument that the head of the FBI is irrelevant to the FBI's work? Or does "obstruction of justice" only stick when it is proven successful? Attempted murder?
I would argue that anyone convicted of "Obstruction of Justice"...was obviously unsuccessful given their conviction.
So the defense that the FBI is still investigating is irrelevant.
It was just testified to Congress that no one has been removed from the investigation. Stop making things up.
You should Google the name James Comey?
He wasn't the investigating agent. The dozens of agents who actually were doing the investigation are still doing it. That was just confirmed to Congress in public. Keep it up with the false narrative though. It's sad.
What's sad/comical is watching the WH narrative fall apart on an almost hourly basis.
Spicy suggested this was all on Rosenstein.
Sounds like Rosenstein wasn't too happy about that.
I can't begin to imagine what the minimum threshold for obtuseness must be to work there...
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
I don't get it...does it matter why he fired him? He can fire him for any reason other than race, gender, sexual orientation, etc...
I guess I am not seeing why it even matters and is worth probing.
He can fire the Director of FBI for any reason?...Sure..Though the only other time it was done, the Dir. was using tax payer funds for home improvement and lied on tax returns etc.
Obstructing or attempting to obstruct Justice is illegal...
Where those two actions intersect is what got Nixon impeached following the Saturday Night Massacre where Nixon fired his AG and Deputy AG when they refused to fire the Special Prosecutor investigating him.
Interesting Side Note:
Trump Friend/advisor/subject of FBI investigation...Roger Stone was a Nixon Advisor and loyalist. He even got a picture of Nixon Tattooed on his back after the scandal..
The ardently Democrat acting Director of the FBI just testified to Congress that the Bureau's investigation into Trump/Russia will not be impacted in any way by Comey being fired. He further testified that no special prosecutor is needed.
Narrative busted.
What narrative? And how was it "busted"?
Confused by your posts..
Lol so now you're gonna play dumb? Your pretending you don't know what I mean is pathetic and childish. The narrative that Trump fired Comey to obstruct the investigation is false and you know it's false yet you still continue to dishonestly insinuate it. Stop lying.
The firing has sparked a storm of criticism but Acting Director Andrew McCabe told a Senate committee it had not affected the work of the FBI.
And he vowed to speak up if there were any political interference in future.
There are reports the ex-FBI boss had asked for more resources to conduct the probe and Democrats in the US Senate have formally requested details from the Justice Department on any additional funding he requested.
Some Democratic senators say they believed the reports to be true, although a Justice Department spokeswoman rejected them as "totally false".
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was reportedly on the verge of resigning after the White House cast him as the prime catalyst for firing Mr Comey, US media reported.
He detailed Mr Comey's "serious mistakes" in a memo to President Trump, just prior to the firing.
Mr Rosenstein reportedly made his threat unless the White House conveyed that the decision began with the president, according to US media.
"I'm not aware of his threatening to resign," White House Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said on ABC's programme Good Morning America on Thursday.
She maintained that Mr Trump "very much had been thinking about letting Mr Comey go since 9 November".
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
I don't get it...does it matter why he fired him? He can fire him for any reason other than race, gender, sexual orientation, etc...
I guess I am not seeing why it even matters and is worth probing.
He can fire the Director of FBI for any reason?...Sure..Though the only other time it was done, the Dir. was using tax payer funds for home improvement and lied on tax returns etc.
Obstructing or attempting to obstruct Justice is illegal...
Where those two actions intersect is what got Nixon impeached following the Saturday Night Massacre where Nixon fired his AG and Deputy AG when they refused to fire the Special Prosecutor investigating him.
Interesting Side Note:
Trump Friend/advisor/subject of FBI investigation...Roger Stone was a Nixon Advisor and loyalist. He even got a picture of Nixon Tattooed on his back after the scandal..
The ardently Democrat acting Director of the FBI just testified to Congress that the Bureau's investigation into Trump/Russia will not be impacted in any way by Comey being fired. He further testified that no special prosecutor is needed.
Narrative busted.
What narrative? And how was it "busted"?
Confused by your posts..
Lol so now you're gonna play dumb? Your pretending you don't know what I mean is pathetic and childish. The narrative that Trump fired Comey to obstruct the investigation is false and you know it's false yet you still continue to dishonestly insinuate it. Stop lying.
How has that been proven false? Dozens of insiders have said that Comey's persistence in the investigation was exactly why he was fired?
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Gandalf77
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
I don't get it...does it matter why he fired him? He can fire him for any reason other than race, gender, sexual orientation, etc...
I guess I am not seeing why it even matters and is worth probing.
He can fire the Director of FBI for any reason?...Sure..Though the only other time it was done, the Dir. was using tax payer funds for home improvement and lied on tax returns etc.
Obstructing or attempting to obstruct Justice is illegal...
Where those two actions intersect is what got Nixon impeached following the Saturday Night Massacre where Nixon fired his AG and Deputy AG when they refused to fire the Special Prosecutor investigating him.
Interesting Side Note:
Trump Friend/advisor/subject of FBI investigation...Roger Stone was a Nixon Advisor and loyalist. He even got a picture of Nixon Tattooed on his back after the scandal..
The ardently Democrat acting Director of the FBI just testified to Congress that the Bureau's investigation into Trump/Russia will not be impacted in any way by Comey being fired. He further testified that no special prosecutor is needed.
Narrative busted.
What narrative? And how was it "busted"?
Confused by your posts..
Lol so now you're gonna play dumb? Your pretending you don't know what I mean is pathetic and childish. The narrative that Trump fired Comey to obstruct the investigation is false and you know it's false yet you still continue to dishonestly insinuate it. Stop lying.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
Ah, so you are saying he was perhaps attempting to obstruct justice. But the FBI would still be investigating, even with Comey gone though? So that seems a huge stretch to me.
It wasn't Comey doing the investigating, it's the FBI.
That is certainly an argument being sold...But where does that end? As long as the FBI has one agent assigned to the case he can fire away?
If clear intent to impede the investigation by removing the Head of the FBI is demonstrated?
Is the argument that the head of the FBI is irrelevant to the FBI's work? Or does "obstruction of justice" only stick when it is proven successful? Attempted murder?
I would argue that anyone convicted of "Obstruction of Justice"...was obviously unsuccessful given their conviction.
So the defense that the FBI is still investigating is irrelevant.
It was just testified to Congress that no one has been removed from the investigation. Stop making things up.
You should Google the name James Comey?
He wasn't the investigating agent. The dozens of agents who actually were doing the investigation are still doing it. That was just confirmed to Congress in public. Keep it up with the false narrative though. It's sad.
What's sad/comical is watching the WH narrative fall apart on an almost hourly basis.
Spicy suggested this was all on Rosenstein.
Sounds like Rosenstein wasn't too happy about that.
I can't begin to imagine what the minimum threshold for obtuseness must be to work there...
So Rosenstein is mad that the letter he wrote recommending Comey be fired resulted in Comey being fired?
Cool story bro.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
I don't get it...does it matter why he fired him? He can fire him for any reason other than race, gender, sexual orientation, etc...
I guess I am not seeing why it even matters and is worth probing.
He can fire the Director of FBI for any reason?...Sure..Though the only other time it was done, the Dir. was using tax payer funds for home improvement and lied on tax returns etc.
Obstructing or attempting to obstruct Justice is illegal...
Where those two actions intersect is what got Nixon impeached following the Saturday Night Massacre where Nixon fired his AG and Deputy AG when they refused to fire the Special Prosecutor investigating him.
Interesting Side Note:
Trump Friend/advisor/subject of FBI investigation...Roger Stone was a Nixon Advisor and loyalist. He even got a picture of Nixon Tattooed on his back after the scandal..
The ardently Democrat acting Director of the FBI just testified to Congress that the Bureau's investigation into Trump/Russia will not be impacted in any way by Comey being fired. He further testified that no special prosecutor is needed.
Narrative busted.
What narrative? And how was it "busted"?
Confused by your posts..
Lol so now you're gonna play dumb? Your pretending you don't know what I mean is pathetic and childish. The narrative that Trump fired Comey to obstruct the investigation is false and you know it's false yet you still continue to dishonestly insinuate it. Stop lying.
How has that been proven false? Dozens of insiders have said that Comey's persistence in the investigation was exactly why he was fired?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: face23785
Not to whether Russia did the hack or not.
Will it matter to a jury if the robber stole Winston or Marlboro cigarettes or whether he robbed the 711?
Will it matter if he got tens and twenties or that he emptied the cash register?
The content doesn't matter at all.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Gandalf77
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
I don't get it...does it matter why he fired him? He can fire him for any reason other than race, gender, sexual orientation, etc...
I guess I am not seeing why it even matters and is worth probing.
He can fire the Director of FBI for any reason?...Sure..Though the only other time it was done, the Dir. was using tax payer funds for home improvement and lied on tax returns etc.
Obstructing or attempting to obstruct Justice is illegal...
Where those two actions intersect is what got Nixon impeached following the Saturday Night Massacre where Nixon fired his AG and Deputy AG when they refused to fire the Special Prosecutor investigating him.
Interesting Side Note:
Trump Friend/advisor/subject of FBI investigation...Roger Stone was a Nixon Advisor and loyalist. He even got a picture of Nixon Tattooed on his back after the scandal..
The ardently Democrat acting Director of the FBI just testified to Congress that the Bureau's investigation into Trump/Russia will not be impacted in any way by Comey being fired. He further testified that no special prosecutor is needed.
Narrative busted.
What narrative? And how was it "busted"?
Confused by your posts..
Lol so now you're gonna play dumb? Your pretending you don't know what I mean is pathetic and childish. The narrative that Trump fired Comey to obstruct the investigation is false and you know it's false yet you still continue to dishonestly insinuate it. Stop lying.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
Ah, so you are saying he was perhaps attempting to obstruct justice. But the FBI would still be investigating, even with Comey gone though? So that seems a huge stretch to me.
It wasn't Comey doing the investigating, it's the FBI.
That is certainly an argument being sold...But where does that end? As long as the FBI has one agent assigned to the case he can fire away?
If clear intent to impede the investigation by removing the Head of the FBI is demonstrated?
Is the argument that the head of the FBI is irrelevant to the FBI's work? Or does "obstruction of justice" only stick when it is proven successful? Attempted murder?
I would argue that anyone convicted of "Obstruction of Justice"...was obviously unsuccessful given their conviction.
So the defense that the FBI is still investigating is irrelevant.
It was just testified to Congress that no one has been removed from the investigation. Stop making things up.
You should Google the name James Comey?
He wasn't the investigating agent. The dozens of agents who actually were doing the investigation are still doing it. That was just confirmed to Congress in public. Keep it up with the false narrative though. It's sad.
What's sad/comical is watching the WH narrative fall apart on an almost hourly basis.
Spicy suggested this was all on Rosenstein.
Sounds like Rosenstein wasn't too happy about that.
I can't begin to imagine what the minimum threshold for obtuseness must be to work there...
So Rosenstein is mad that the letter he wrote recommending Comey be fired resulted in Comey being fired?
Cool story bro.
Well there is this....
www.rawstory.com...
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: BlueAjah
I hear that McCabe testified today that there is no need for any additional funds to investigate Russian collusion/hacking.
It is looking more like there is something fishy about the story of Comey asking for additional funds.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Gandalf77
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
I don't get it...does it matter why he fired him? He can fire him for any reason other than race, gender, sexual orientation, etc...
I guess I am not seeing why it even matters and is worth probing.
He can fire the Director of FBI for any reason?...Sure..Though the only other time it was done, the Dir. was using tax payer funds for home improvement and lied on tax returns etc.
Obstructing or attempting to obstruct Justice is illegal...
Where those two actions intersect is what got Nixon impeached following the Saturday Night Massacre where Nixon fired his AG and Deputy AG when they refused to fire the Special Prosecutor investigating him.
Interesting Side Note:
Trump Friend/advisor/subject of FBI investigation...Roger Stone was a Nixon Advisor and loyalist. He even got a picture of Nixon Tattooed on his back after the scandal..
The ardently Democrat acting Director of the FBI just testified to Congress that the Bureau's investigation into Trump/Russia will not be impacted in any way by Comey being fired. He further testified that no special prosecutor is needed.
Narrative busted.
What narrative? And how was it "busted"?
Confused by your posts..
Lol so now you're gonna play dumb? Your pretending you don't know what I mean is pathetic and childish. The narrative that Trump fired Comey to obstruct the investigation is false and you know it's false yet you still continue to dishonestly insinuate it. Stop lying.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: Indigo5
Ah, so you are saying he was perhaps attempting to obstruct justice. But the FBI would still be investigating, even with Comey gone though? So that seems a huge stretch to me.
It wasn't Comey doing the investigating, it's the FBI.
That is certainly an argument being sold...But where does that end? As long as the FBI has one agent assigned to the case he can fire away?
If clear intent to impede the investigation by removing the Head of the FBI is demonstrated?
Is the argument that the head of the FBI is irrelevant to the FBI's work? Or does "obstruction of justice" only stick when it is proven successful? Attempted murder?
I would argue that anyone convicted of "Obstruction of Justice"...was obviously unsuccessful given their conviction.
So the defense that the FBI is still investigating is irrelevant.
It was just testified to Congress that no one has been removed from the investigation. Stop making things up.
You should Google the name James Comey?
He wasn't the investigating agent. The dozens of agents who actually were doing the investigation are still doing it. That was just confirmed to Congress in public. Keep it up with the false narrative though. It's sad.
What's sad/comical is watching the WH narrative fall apart on an almost hourly basis.
Spicy suggested this was all on Rosenstein.
Sounds like Rosenstein wasn't too happy about that.
I can't begin to imagine what the minimum threshold for obtuseness must be to work there...
So Rosenstein is mad that the letter he wrote recommending Comey be fired resulted in Comey being fired?
Cool story bro.
Well there is this....
www.rawstory.com...