It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Does the Nazca lines PROVE that dinosaurs co-existed with humans in the recent past?

page: 4
8
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 11 2017 @ 08:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Raggedyman

Wow, I thought the post I originally responded to was being sarcastic. Some elements are classed as assumptions based on the fact that there wasn't any human being there to actually witness events first hand.

I'll walk away just shaking my head


Some times that's the logical thing to do
Spock would be proud

It's interesting to note, a big dinosaur drawn on the ground, Ica stones, et al

That's called confirmation bias, you need to believe it's not what it appears to be

I am a christian, I can believe evolution or creation, not you....




posted on May, 11 2017 @ 09:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Raggedyman

Wow, I thought the post I originally responded to was being sarcastic. Some elements are classed as assumptions based on the fact that there wasn't any human being there to actually witness events first hand.

I'll walk away just shaking my head


Some times that's the logical thing to do
Spock would be proud

It's interesting to note, a big dinosaur drawn on the ground, Ica stones, et al

That's called confirmation bias, you need to believe it's not what it appears to be

I am a christian, I can believe evolution or creation, not you....


Why are you making assumptions about what I do or don't believe? I don't see creation in a religious sense and evolution should be considered mutually exclusive, but then maybe I don't stick my head in the sand.

You see a dinosaur, I don't. You want to see one, I'm ambivalent, It's not unreasonable to suggest that dinosaur remains had been found centuries ago, it's also not unreasonable to suggest that people had a vivid imagination.

I really thought your original post was a parody, wow.



posted on May, 11 2017 @ 09:13 AM
link   
a reply to: uncommitted

If you think that one carving on the surface is evidence then you are correct, I have seen to much other evidence, I don't claim it's scientific
I don't question Dino remains, just the dates

You are welcome to your opinion, me I am happy with mine



posted on May, 11 2017 @ 09:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: uncommitted

If you think that one carving on the surface is evidence then you are correct, I have seen to much other evidence, I don't claim it's scientific
I don't question Dino remains, just the dates

You are welcome to your opinion, me I am happy with mine


I'm sure you've seen lots of 'evidence' on creationist websites, good luck with that. Ultimately though what you choose to believe in is your business.



posted on May, 11 2017 @ 09:56 AM
link   
a reply to: uncommitted

Thankyou



posted on May, 11 2017 @ 10:06 AM
link   
Proof of God??



new topics

top topics
 
8
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join