It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Do you know it's more costly than treating cervical cancer?
There are already clinicians on site, simple cut and clean isn't it, could be loads cheaper than cervical cancer care.
originally posted by: jkm1864
Actually the clitoris is a small undeveloped penis which would grow into a penis with hormonal therapy so saying it has more nerve endings is kind of dumb.
The clitoris contains at least 8,000 sensory nerve endings. To put that into perspective, the penis has about 4,000. That makes this tiny area the most sensitive part of a woman’s erogenous zone.
originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Yep I appreciated your reply.
I'm just thinking budgets and mortality rates, and I wonder at the majority of developed world not advocating cutting thing.
Conspiracy then yeah?
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
The extra folds of skin can harbor disease that would infect the female partner's vagina, and the extra blood vessels on the male foreskin are susceptible to sexually transmitted diseases from the partner. The less skin, the less likely to get infected.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Lagomorphe
Actually it's quite possible you DID experience problems and did not even know it. You can have HPV without knowing it.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: Lagomorphe
Yes, being cut offers protection.
No one is suggesting if you are not circumcised you automatically have problems and you never will if you are.
It's merely being pointed out being circumcised does convey a health benefit both to men and their partners.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Yes, being cut offers protection.