Atheists have no answers

a reply to: randyvs

Quality rebuttal.

a reply to: WakeUpBeer

I chuckled at that but I'm still waiting for a defence statement regarding alleged gods creating terminal childhood diseases.
I wouldn't invent such things if I was creating a new universe.
Seems cruel to me.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: intrptr

That 'ideology' has no basis in fact either.

Already demonstrated that there is plenty of facts for a court to find
in favor of a creator over atheism.

You are just wrong because your ignorant.

Which court would see the case? Not one. Its ignorant to believe in either one. Life was brought here, not poofed from thin air or percolated in electric mud puddles.

a reply to: intrptr

You know that?
I keep an open mind due to lack of verification.

a reply to: grainofsand
Makes the most sense, to me.

If you look over there and see a garden with neat rows of plants growing, who says where did this come from? We know that it just didn't pop out of the ground by itself. Somebody put it there.

a reply to: intrptr

No, 'we' don't know that

a reply to: grainofsand

And here I thought the thread title was "Atheists have no answers".

Apparently neither does Rands.

originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: RP2SticksOfDynamite

The old testament Christian god was a #ing monster.
But I'm sure Randy can explain how he/she/it had a good reason, although I'm still awaiting the explanation for horrific terminal childhood diseases though.

You fall in to the catogory of the billigerent atheist.

Hear it from a Professor





You think you can just tell me off
You are the one with delusions.

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: grainofsand

And here I thought the thread title was "Atheists have no answers".

Apparently neither does Rands.

Maybe just timezone stuff.

a reply to: randyvs

Maybe nothing to do with timezones lol
I love you Randy.
...but not because a god wants me to love you x

originally posted by: grainofsand
a reply to: intrptr

No, 'we' don't know that

I said makes the most sense, 'to me'.

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: grainofsand

And here I thought the thread title was "Atheists have no answers".

Apparently neither does Rands.

You are exactly right. I don't but God does.

Every ignorant question you can imagine is answered right here.

a reply to: intrptr

Yeah fair one, I concede that.

*edit*
...with a smile

originally posted by: randyvs

originally posted by: WakeUpBeer
a reply to: grainofsand

And here I thought the thread title was "Atheists have no answers".

Apparently neither does Rands.

You are exactly right. I don't but God does.

And what's your gods "answers"?

Kill?
Rape?
Discriminate?
Slavery?
Genocide?

And you say he's a "loving" god?!

a reply to: grainofsand

You guys do know that randy doesn't believe any of this nonsense. He just likes trolling these forums. You guys are giving him exactly what he wants. Wasting your time so you are not having more productive conversations. It is really best to ignore him. There are far better opponents who will actually want to hear what you have to say. I'm sure you all know this, but it bears repeating any time i see people wasting their time with him.

That is why he never answers questions, so he can be as vague and non descriptive as possible. It keeps the fish on the hook longer.

a reply to: grainofsand

Maybe nothing to do with timezones lol I love you Randy.

I relish the compliment.

a reply to: Woodcarver

Oh I'm disappointed now.
It is rare I'm ever trolled, but I guess we're all imperfect humans.

a reply to: TerryDon79

And you say he's a "loving" god?!

Yep!

a reply to: grainofsand

The problem isn't that atheists have no answers, it's simply that Randy won't read your links. Randy doesn't come here to learn things he comes here to argue, and to taunt people.

originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: grainofsand

The problem isn't that atheists have no answers, it's simply that Randy won't read your links. Randy doesn't come here to learn things he comes here to argue, and to taunt people.

Ooh that's quite the claim.
I look forward to the rebuttal.