It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Zero Hedge as a source...?

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on May, 8 2017 @ 03:24 PM

originally posted by: dfnj2015

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: SBMcG

Zero Hedge doesn't fail me often.

I find their journalist integrity level quite high.

What do you mean by "integrity level" ? Do you just mean stories that agree with you ideology? Or do you mean they are balanced in representing both sides of a political spectrum on an issue? Or do you mean literally they are very good and fact checking before they publish a story?

I thought this story was very good:

The graph titled "Net National Savings" was very insightful.

Seek Truth and Report It and a few other things.

They seem to hold themselves to a higher standard, like the good old days lol.
Code of Ethics

posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 06:01 PM

originally posted by: FyreByrd
from Rational Wiki (a direct quote, I kid you not): Zero Hedge is a bat# insane Austrian school finance blog run by two pseudonymous founders...

Your kidding right?

Even "National Lampoon" has more credibility than "RationalWiki"...

"We all know that RationalWiki is a liberal propaganda site..." Link

"a horrible piece of establishment propaganda... littered with false statements and ad hominem. I imagine that the whole of the wiki is a collection of gatekeepers for consensus science and PTB doctrine...."

"...anyone can anonymously write whatever they want (but correction of the tripe written will be considered “vandalism”!) RationalWiki is one of those sites. RationalWiki is a project of Trent Toulouse, who has the stated objective of “exposing conspiracy theories”. He once implied that he considers a conspiracy theory everything that disagrees with mainstream dogma, making RationalWiki a platform for anyone with an agenda to attack researchers struggling to bring important facts to public attention."

"RationalWiki is now just another outlet for #FTBullies ideology... they are totally baboon property. Monkeys dancing for the organ grinder... the "talk" pages for their hatchet job/character assassination wiki entries show how utterly corrupt it is..."

"Their alternative weapon is called "rational wiki" (an oxymoron) and it is allegedly ran by a student named Toulouse, from Hamilton, Canada. He is as real as that shady guy who runs, with an added character feature of inferiority complex. Of course, it is possible that he too does not exist (a made-up character), or that he has been co-opted by intelligence services, as they do draft students.

RationalWiki is a genetic-egalitarian race-denialist propaganda website that is run by Ontario resident Trent Toulouse. RationalWiki is a wiki founded by secular humanists in response to Conservapedia. They regard Richard Dawkins as their messiah. It is based on MediaWiki, like Metapedia. The wiki has around 4200 English pages middle of May 2010. The information is inaccurate and sparse. The wiki begs for donations. The site is extremely anti-Christian and anti-Conservative and promotes sodomy and gun restriction.

The website fraudulently portrays itself as being “rational”, and opposed to “pseudoscience”, yet promotes exactly the thing that they claim to oppose: the irrational spiritual pseudosciences of genetic egalitarianism and race denialism. On top of such deceptiveness, Trent Toulouse solicits donations (on the website’s main page) under these false pretenses. That fits within the definition of criminal fraud." A note on "Rational Wiki"

"Some of the most untrue bunch of lies that could ever be written in the entire world were written by RationalWiki. They claim that they are the truth and the holy appointed protectors of science and their subjects. They do not tell the truth. RationalWiki is the biggest con job on the internet. It is the National Enquirer of skeptical thought.

They are like Stormfront for intellectual people that pimp a platform of hate and scorn for those that they hate, no matter how wrong and biased that they are and kudos for those that they DO like. RationalWiki is the most biased thing out there on the internet today. They are NOT rational or intelligent. RationalWiki is a fraud factory. It is a quack’s encyclopedia. They are pseudo-intellectual quackery at its finest. RationalWiki is a joke!" Source

Take, for example, the RationalWiki article on pseudoscience. One merely has to lightly read through it to see some of the most arrogant statements that can be made. ...there is no excuse for passing this kind of blithely arrogant and shallow material off as anything other than trash, and that’s not even dealing with the factual inaccuracies.

The entire site is plagued by trash (the only suitable term) of this nature. I have no doubts that RationalWiki is just a front for Left-Wing Progressivism (a type of Socialism, basically), based on the style of the writing and the methods of argumentation used.

RationalWiki is a Front for Socialist Indoctrination

posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 08:37 PM
Just reading some of the articles on Zero hedge, it seems to be predicting many economic problems on the horizon

KKR Sees A 100% Probability Of Recession In 24 Monthst

Reclusive Millionaire Warns: “Get Out of Cash Now”

Greenspan Warns: "We Have A Stock Market Bubble"

GE Just Signaled The Next Crisis (And Nobody's Paying Attention)

posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 08:46 PM
I don't have any problems with ZH, I check out their site frequently and I've been a 'member' there for at least 8 years. They have deleted a few of my comments though, usually related to treasury issuing state currency, debt free (greenbacks).

posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 08:47 PM
They are first and foremost a forum/news source for traders. They have an Austrian bent or bias but I wouldn't say they adhere completely to Austrian economics.

They are for traders really

posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 09:35 PM
a reply to: SBMcG

They expose things that MSM refuses to do. I find they have a lot of credibility, they just give you the source and let you decide for yourself, no twisting and personal opinion.

new topics

top topics
<< 1   >>

log in