It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
UPI
The Pentagon confirmed to United Press International Wednesday that a cumulative total of 955,000 troops from all military services had been deployed for Operation Iraqi or Enduring Freedom by the end of September. More than 300,000 of those troops have been deployed more than once, the Pentagon said.
One government source said the total number of troops deployed has likely hit 1 million since then.
The Pentagon data shows that 708,000 of the troops who have served in war come from the active duty force. That means that roughly half of the United States' 1.4 million active duty troops have gone to war. Slightly more than 245,000 troops from reserve and National Guard units have also been deployed.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Let me add what my overall suspicion is:
I bet that the death rate of US soldiers in Iraq vs the quantity served is LOWER than if those very same males in their age groups would suffer back at home living a “normal” life.
if you are a male in the age group of 25 to 44 then there is 0.2% (200 per 100,000) that you would die this year (of any cause).
Originally posted by skippytjc
Thanks man!!
So, if 955,000 troops have served, and we are a little shy of 1500 dead to date, we can assume the following:
Originally posted by Nygdan
Whats the number of US deaths from both these wars then?
Am I missing something?
Originally posted by AceOfBase
Originally posted by Nygdan
Whats the number of US deaths from both these wars then?
Am I missing something?
What's missing is that the troops are rotated.
Although about a million troops have served, there are only about 125,000 - 150,000 there at any one time.
There have almost certainly been deaths among those who have returned to US soil and they are not counted in those 1,400 troops that have died in Iraq because they did not die in Iraq.
Originally posted by AceOfBase
What's missing is that the troops are rotated.
Although about a million troops have served, there are only about 125,000 - 150,000 there at any one time.
Originally posted by Nygdan
How does that make a difference? Total involved and dead as a result of combat injuries. Rotation doesn't make a difference.
If a soldier is shot or wounded in iraq, and evacuated to landsthul and dies, I'd think he'd be counted as a war casualty no?
Originally posted by Nygdan
Also, are comparable statistics kept for non death casualties? I think that in any consideration, that does have to be included.
It wouldn't negate that fact, at least so far, that a soldier in these Terror Wars is safer than an average citizen in terms of life, but what about people who loose limbs or are paralyzed?
Originally posted by AceOfBase
According to an article on the number of wounded, they say about 6% of the wounded required amputations. (link)
There's about 11,000 wounded from Iraq so 6% of that would be almost 700 amputees.
Surely that's higher than the civilian population.