It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Meanwhile, contrary to those doctors selected to legitimize ObamaCare in the staged media event (where the White House actually handed out white lab coats to generate the image of official credibility), an overwhelming 70 percent of doctors said, even back in 2011, that they disagreed with the AMA’s position on health reform, while only 13 percent agreed with it. In fact, almost half of doctors in that survey even went so far as to say that the AMA stance on ObamaCare was the factor causing them to drop AMA membership.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: matafuchs
So, just who are these 24 million who are going to suddenly lost healthcare?
People who matter, no matter how poorly you try to marginalize them.
Everyone is entitled to health care and right to life and to live.
originally posted by: Mordekaiser
a reply to: Krazysh0t
With Canada right next to us, it's a hopeless argument. Their situation with the tax write offs is literally the PERFECT extra outlet for 'the wealthy' in our economy.
For example:
-- Gleevec (a cancer treatment): $6,214 (per month/per customer) in the United States, compared to $1,141 in Canada and $2,697 in England.
-- Humira (for rheumatoid arthritis): $2,246 in the United States, compared to $881 in Switzerland and $1,102 in England.
-- Cymbalta (for depression): $194 in the United States, compared to $46 in England and $52 in the Netherlands. In fact, there is also a generic version of Cymbalta so these prices reflect having a cheaper alternative.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: matafuchs
So, just who are these 24 million who are going to suddenly lost healthcare?
People who matter, no matter how poorly you try to marginalize them.
Firstly 24 million people are not going to suddenly lose their healthcare. That number relates to 2026 and is more to do with options around stopping medicaid expansion.
The initial number is 14m and most of those are people who only pay for Obamacare because they don't want to pay the penalty.
The 24m number is a politically useful one to bandy around, but like most political propaganda it is meaningless.
originally posted by: Kali74
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: Kali74
originally posted by: DBCowboy
originally posted by: Kali74
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: FauxMulder
If that means no more mandate, then I'll be happy.
That's really all they had to change.
I'll die without insurance.
You'll forgive me if I don't celebrate, right?
Yeah. It's okay. I'm sure there are plenty who might feel the impact. I certainly knew people who were impacted with the advent of Obamacare.
I still hope you recover soon.
I have no shot at recovery if I lose access to the medicine I need to take.
What are the circumstances you have that means you will lose access to your medication?
I've been battling Cancer for over a year now and unable to work. My FMLA has run out, the insurance I had through my job is gone. I still hope to return to work but if this passes the Senate, I won't be able to afford insurance now... and who knows how this will affect states with free health care.