Pics of Earth from Moon - Which is real Nasa?

originally posted by: stonerwilliam

that one's really of moon from earth

from looks of it!

a reply to: grey580

Lockheed Skunkworks Weather ballons

a reply to: Christosterone

How did NASA loose the Tech to get back to the moon.

How did NASA loose it? The same way they loosed the dogs of war, loosely speaking.

Anyway this is an argument you're sure to lose. They didn't fake the pics of Earth from the Moon.

originally posted by: Tekaran

2nd Image

^ CGI terrain -- spliced together with Earth in the background. A computer-generated representation.

originally posted by: 11SK1180
a reply to: Christosterone

How did NASA loose the Tech to get back to the moon.

Richard Nixon took all the Upsidasium with him when he left office.

a reply to: vnski


perihelion and ,Aphelion or Perigee and Apogee as some say , I remember reading somewhere as viewed from the moon the Earth would be between 40-52 % of your e because the earth would look really real big from there

lion as some would say indeed, cause nowadays can't tell difference between sun and moon in cloudy sky anymore

remember when the sun was a lot yellower and slightly bigger, those were the happy realer days

now both moon and even sun seem so stone cold, as far as silver lined bluiesh tone not the increased radiation despite minimum.

a reply to: Tekaran

Following images were released in 2013

Taken by Lunar Orbiter 1 in 1966. Lunar Orbiter as name suggests was to take high resolution closeup pictures of lunar
surface to map out landing sites for Apollo

sservi.nasa.gov...

Was some concern about taking picture as required the spacecraft attitude be altered to point camera away from lunar surface to take the pictures

originally posted by: 11SK1180
a reply to: Christosterone

How did NASA loose the Tech to get back to the moon.

They didn't.
They just don't have a Saturn V type heavy lift vehicle at the moment.
That's just a moon hoax believer lie.
Jeez, fella!

a reply to: 11SK1180

How did NASA loose the Tech to get back to the moon.

They didn't - plans, both on paper and microfilm . still exist

SATURN V was a single purpose launch vehicle - purpose was to get men to moon and back

Once achieved Congress decided not to fund any more missions

Last SATURN V was flown using only 2 stages in 1973 to launch SKYLAB Space Station

Rocketdyne, which built the first stage of SATURN V has done some design work to update the F1 engines, 5 of which
powered the first stage

Much of the rocket was custom built by hand, the people and their expertise no longer exist and would be extremely expensive to recreate

The new engine, designated F1 B uses a simplified design (at small lose in efficiency) and modern computer controlled
manufacturing techniques


arstechnica.com...

originally posted by: vnski
lion as some would say indeed, cause nowadays can't tell difference between sun and moon in cloudy sky anymore

remember when the sun was a lot yellower and slightly bigger, those were the happy realer days

now both moon and even sun seem so stone cold, as far as silver lined bluiesh tone not the increased radiation despite minimum.

Are you sure?
😪😂😰

originally posted by: 11SK1180
a reply to: Christosterone

How did NASA loose the Tech to get back to the moon.

Why do you think NASA lost the tech? It was the money they lost, the tech's still there.

Thing is, they didnt even bother go halfway to the moon.

Just record it in some desert terrain on earth, ie Vegas.

Surprised theres no plumber's truck in the backdrop!

originally posted by: letni
Thing is, they didnt even bother go halfway to the moon.

Just record it in some desert terrain on earth, ie Vegas.

Surprised theres no plumber's truck in the backdrop!

Thing is, that's just not true.

a reply to: letni

That seems like the kind of claim that would require evidence. Like how was NASA able to magically manipulate the laws of physics for everything they recorded to perfectly match 1/6g in a vacuum?