It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What data has been offered to me?
originally posted by: Kashai
a reply to: D8Tee
Actually you really should research the data that has been offered to you prior to such a position.
You know when it gets to the really cool stuff the modern science into an open mind is investigated in relation to those type of jobs.
The Maya Creation Story
By Gene Fernandez
People of all times and places have sought to understand how the universe came into being and how humanity developed. Each culture provides its own account, unique in detail but embodying universal themes. This similarity of thought among remote civilizations may indicate a form of archetypal intelligence available to any human being with the spiritual capacity to access it, as well as the existence of a very ancient worldwide civilization. The Popol Vuh records one branch of the ancient Central American heritage. Written shortly after the Spanish conquest by a Quiche Indian in his native language but using the Roman alphabet, it was transcribed and translated into Spanish by a Dominican priest in Guatemala at the end of the 17th century. His manuscript, housed in the library of the University of San Carlos, Guatemala City, was brought to the attention of European scholars in 1854, making Maya cosmogony and history available outside Central America. Today researchers can also draw on other documents, inscriptions, and the traditions kept alive by the Maya's descendants.
originally posted by: Alexander the Great
I'm am not a scientist... but what I can say is, climate change isn't the "End of the world". We will be fine.
originally posted by: Xenogears
nasa on climate
Global sea level rose about 8 inches in the last century. The rate in the last two decades, however, is nearly double that of the last century.4
Climate Misinformer: Willie Soon
Favourite climate myths by Willie Soon
Below are many of the climate myths used by Willie Soon plus how often each myth has been used.
Climate myths by Soon____What the Science Says
"It's the sun" ____In the last 35 years of global warming, sun and climate have been going in opposite directions
"Models are unreliable"____Models successfully reproduce temperatures since 1900 globally, by land, in the air and the ocean.
"It's not happening" ____There are many lines of evidence indicating global warming is unequivocal.
"Polar bear numbers are increasing"____Polar bears are in danger of extinction as well as many other species.
-skepticalscience link
After Greenpeace revealed that Willie Soon has taken over $1 million in payments from fossil fuel interests on “research” intended to undermine climate science, his credibility has evaporated. Professionals in the field of climate have been hugely critical of Dr. Soon’s predetermined “research.”-greenpeace
originally posted by: D8Tee
One, the 97 percent concensus. Thats been debunked many times. They have it on that webpage.
After Greenpeace revealed that Willie Soon has taken over $1 million in payments from fossil fuel interests on “research” intended to undermine climate science, his credibility has evaporated. Professionals in the field of climate have been hugely critical of Dr. Soon’s predetermined “research.”-greenpeace
An investigation by InsideClimate News could find no cases where mainstream climatologists had failed to disclose the funding of their research. Unlike Soon, who had approached private funders directly, their funding was almost entirely obtained through open competitive peer-reviewed applications to public bodies...
The Smithsonian does not fund Soon, who "pursues external grants to fund his research."[36] This funding had exceeded US$1.5 million since 2001;[35] under standard CfA procedures, more than half of the $1.2 million funding since 2005 had gone towards the Smithsonian's facility operating costs, with the remainder being passed on to Soon as his salary. Other researchers there have a similar arrangement, but nearly all of their funding comes through peer-reviewed award processes from government bodies such as NASA and the National Science Foundation,[37] whereas Soon has received very little federal money.[4] Soon's funding is highly unusual at the Smithsonian in its association with private interests.
-wiki
..
Given these results, it is clear that support among scientists for human-caused climate change is below 97%. Most studies including specialties other than climatologists find support in the range of 80% to 90%. The 97% consensus of scientists, when used without limitation to climate scientists, is false.
In the strict sense, the 97% consensus is false, even when limited to climate scientists. The 2016 Cook review found the consensus to be “shared by 90%–100% of publishing climate scientists.” One survey found it to be 84%. Continuing to claim 97% support is deceptive. I find the 97% consensus of climate scientists to be overstated...-for bes
It is very likely that the global mean rate was 1.7 [1.5 to 1.9] mm yr –1 between 1901 and 2010 for a total sea level rise of 0.19 [0.17 to 0.21] m. Between 1993 and 2010, the rate was very likely higher at 3.2 [2.8 to 3.6] mm yr –1 ; similarly high rates likely occurred between 1920 and 1950.
Global Mean Sea Levels.. Satellite Altimetry..
Shouldn't we be more interested in the Tidal Data that actually represents what is happening on our coastlines?
Shouldn't we be more interested in the Tidal Data that actually represents what is happening on our coastlines?
I'm sure you're aware of the Metonic Cycle, do you think that could account for any rise and fall in the tidal data as part of that cycle?