It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Revealed: Eleventh-hour Subpoenas in the Clinton E-mails Investigation

page: 1
35
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+11 more 
posted on May, 1 2017 @ 09:53 AM
link   
Well well well.

Looky what Judicial Watch found out.

www.nationalreview.com...

Pertinent quotes:


Mrs. Clinton’s friends at the Justice Department chose not to subpoena Mrs. Clinton’s friends from the State Department and the campaign. The decision not to employ regular criminal procedures — i.e., the decision not to treat the case like other criminal cases — was quite deliberate.



Thus, there was no need to convene a grand jury in order to use a grand jury’s evidence-collection powers. Again, the Justice Department and the FBI could have issued and served subpoenas on Mrs. Clinton and her accomplices at any time. To refrain from doing so was a conscious choice.



Initially, the Justice Department publicly confirmed that a criminal referral had been received from the intel IG. But Justice abruptly reversed itself. According to the new party line, what was received was “not a criminal referral,” but instead “a referral related to the potential compromise of classified information” — almost making it sound as if Clinton were a victim rather than the perp.



Read the article..

There is a lot to it than that.


There should have been/ or be a special prosecutor appointed to look into the affair....it stinks to high heaven.



+16 more 
posted on May, 1 2017 @ 09:58 AM
link   
I don't think the general public is fooled for a second about how Mrs. Clinton was given special treatment. It's a shame when justice has different scales depending on who you are. Mrs. Clinton is a piece of garbage and the American Public clearly stated that when they didn't vote for her.

She may have kept herself out of jail be we kept her out of the white house.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 10:20 AM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa
Yes.
I think Comey should be in the crosshairs of the investigation too, at this point.


+1 more 
posted on May, 1 2017 @ 11:09 AM
link   
This will go down in history as one of the most corrupt public figures supported by the US government.

With time, it will eventually become clear the power games and tragic lives ruined by the monstrous Clintons.

It will also be shocking for future generations that we Americans let it happen and did nothing. Shameful period for Americans.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 11:18 AM
link   
What happened to Trumps promise to prosecute Clinton and put her in jail?

Has he appointed a special prosecutor yet?


edit on 1-5-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 11:21 AM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Patience...
Remember - when an ethical FBI and Justice Dept. are doing a proper investigation, they do not make it public.

Just because Trump is not investigating does not mean that he has not untied the hands of those who actually do the investigating.


+3 more 
posted on May, 1 2017 @ 11:25 AM
link   


The 2016 election is the gift that keeps giving...

Thanks democrAts for being so inept..
Your decisions have brought me unbridled joy since November 9th.

-Chris



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 11:40 AM
link   
Bah.. If the "Afluenza" kid can kill 5 people and earn a ticket to a fancy resort, then Clinton's crimes are more like shoplifting a pack of gum in comparison. She wont see the inside of a prison.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12
What happened to Trumps promise to prosecute Clinton and put her in jail?

Has he appointed a special prosecutor yet?



His administration is more concerned with Wikileaks.

Clinton is cool. Like the Don said, "she's had it rough, we should take it easy on her."



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 01:01 PM
link   


First, the fact that grand-jury subpoenas were issued does not necessarily mean the grand jury was actually used. Did the Justice Department ever summon witnesses to testify about the Clinton criminal investigation before the grand jury? Did the Justice Department even alert a grand jury that it had subpoenaed records on the grand jury’s authority? I’m betting there was no real presentation to the grand jury; only grudging use of grand-jury process when there was no alternative and no chance Clinton would be damaged by news coverage about it. Second, consider what else was going on. At the very same time it was bending over backwards not to make a case on Hillary Clinton, the Justice Department was pushing very aggressively — on much thinner evidence — to try to prove that the presidential campaign of Donald Trump was in cahoots with the Putin regime. For Clinton, the Obama Justice Department ran away from the grand jury, notwithstanding that its use in investigations of obvious crimes is standard. For Trump, the Obama Justice Department ran to the FISA court, notwithstanding that its use in an investigation of the opposing political party’s presidential candidate, based on sketchy information, is extraordinary. Russia’s apparent preference for one presidential candidate over the other is routinely described as a sinister scheme to “interfere with the election.” Fair enough. But how shall we describe the Department of Justice’s patent preference for one presidential candidate over the other? Read more at: www.nationalreview.com...

And the only way we get this info is through a court fight from judicial watch? Yeah that obama administration was the most transparent ever.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 01:42 PM
link   
How many people got suicided around her and bill?
Nobody wants to be next, added to the fact the FBI is in her pocket.
What did you expect?

Her and Obama could make a snuff film in broad daylight on live tv and nothing would happen.
edit on 512017 by Natas0114 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 01:53 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill

Thank goodness she did not win or America would be in terrible shape right now. A deadlocked Congress... WW3.. just horrible!



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 09:09 PM
link   



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 09:10 PM
link   
Didn't Michelle Obama say something like, "they go low, and we go high..."?



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 10:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: GuidedKill

Thank goodness she did not win or America would be in terrible shape right now. A deadlocked Congress... WW3.. just horrible!


So right were we are not? Trump the Savior of the little guy is actually a Billionaire insider! WHO COULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT!?



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 10:29 PM
link   
I invite people to name great leaders who came from among the poor.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 10:29 PM
link   
I invite people to name great leaders who came from among the poor.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 10:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: FlyingFox
I invite people to name great leaders who came from among the poor.


Eisenhower




posted on May, 2 2017 @ 09:13 AM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

It is exactly this which makes me totally implode. I see a completely rotten, totally corrupted elite running the country as they please, with no accountability, millions and millions running unchecked and changing owners.

Susan Rize - salary 180 k per year - - and now networth 50 Million ... How did that happen? Of course that happened - its the system they were running.

And then the Justice - or lack of it - just to show nothing can touch these fellows.

I am having a total meltdown here. Folks go directly to jail for crossing tongue with FBI or taking a misplaced photo - but nothing seems to worry these political elites from being totally corrupt serial criminals.



posted on May, 2 2017 @ 03:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: FlyingFox
I invite people to name great leaders who came from among the poor.


Ulysses S Grants father was a tanner in a hide factory...
Chester A Arthur had similar humble beginnings...
Andrew Jacksons parents were poor immigrants...
Jimmy Carter's dad was a "community leader" and store owner in a VERY poor area...

Dude, those are off the top of my head...if u spent a few minutes on google u could find a slew of similar examples..

-Chris



new topics

top topics



 
35
<<   2 >>

log in

join