It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump: ‘I’m a Nationalist and a Globalist’ “I’m both.”

page: 1
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 1 2017 @ 01:45 AM
link   
Trump: ‘I’m a Nationalist and a Globalist’



On the eve of the 100 days in office milestone, President Donald Trump claims he is both a nationalist and a globalist — despite campaign promises that his presidency would reject globalism and put America first. Source Breitbart



Im not taking it out of context. He actually said it. The source is breitbart news. The very media that helped Trump get elected.

So what happened to his slogan




"Americanism not Globalism will be our credo?"




Ivanka Pushes Open Borders & Globalism




He is continuing Obama's policies. If this doesn't open your eyes, that he is controlled opposition I don't know what will. The events are unfolding before your very eyes. Welcome to the New World Order.




posted on May, 1 2017 @ 01:59 AM
link   
a reply to: SoulSurfer

He's saying he's a national globalist.

Like, he supports nationalism on a global scale, sovereignty for each and every nation in the world and such.

No conspiracy, no flip flop, just more Trumpisms from Trump.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 02:00 AM
link   
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Its almost like its a trend for presidents from both sides appease the same people..... But no way, they're polar opposites..

That would be like Obama bombing more countries than Bush....

Impossible.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 02:04 AM
link   
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Leaving this as the final word makes it look like a warning shot from Breitbart:


In an interview with conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham last month, former presidential candidate and conservative commentator Pat Buchanan said abandoning his populist economic message would be “fatal” for Trump’s presidency.


He's got 80% approval from Conservatives. Compromise might broaden the appeal to those who are moderates. Is that a bad thing?



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 02:05 AM
link   
Wow, Bannon gets in a dig at the president. Guess he's gonna use his freedom of the press to exact a little revenge.

On another note trumps supporters have star dust in their eyes and see no problem with flip flop policies.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 02:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Kandinsky

How about g-l-o-b-o-n-a-t-i-o-n-a-l-i-s-t?

You saw it here first. Now watch Spicer say it tomorrow in a press conference.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 02:14 AM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Tis the season of the epithet!

Globonationalist has a ring to it



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 02:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Kandinsky

better grab that popcorn cause i sense more surprises to come.That warning shot proves it.


originally posted by: Sillyolme
Wow, Bannon gets in a dig at the president. Guess he's gonna use his freedom of the press to exact a little revenge.

On another note trumps supporters have star dust in their eyes and see no problem with flip flop policies.


Many are in for a rude awakening. But you are correct. At this point, the elites played their hands very well. They succeeded in dividing the truth movement.

Somehow I feel we would have been better off with Moloch Hillary winning for one reason. Least that way we could have all united as one massive force because we would all know that Hillary is bad.

But with trump winning, it succeeded in causing even more confusion. Not many know what the enemy is anymore. Trump appears on infowars, and bam all of a sudden he is the savior.

Hell Even I gave him the benefit of the doubt. But if it's too good to be true, then it probably is. The fact that he is now continuing Obama's policies should speak volumes.


edit on st2017000000Mondayst000000Mon, 01 May 2017 02:24:12 -0500fAmerica/ChicagoMon, 01 May 2017 02:24:12 -0500 by SoulSurfer because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 03:05 AM
link   
a reply to: ColdWisdom

Don't waste your time.

This is just another hit piece from the usual people who want to cry because their rather bitchy candidate did not win.

People throw these words around like they have special significance.

OOOH, Socialism is sooo baaaddddd. Nationalism is soooo baaadddd.

Most have no bloody idea what they actually are.

Just more crap!

P



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 03:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: SoulSurfer

Like, he supports nationalism on a global scale, sovereignty for each and every nation in the world and such.

Lmao, the denial is strong here... what will it take for you guys to realize Trump is no longer in control? He's flipped on so many of his stances in the last few weeks it's ridiculous... reversed on Syria and Russia, reversed on Wikileaks, reversed on nationalism, reversed on China, and his new director of media relations was the leader of the NeverTrump movement... it doesn't get much more obvious than this. My guess is one of the intelligence agencies is threatening him with something that could ruin him, or maybe even threatening his life or family, I don't really know, but I do know he has been compromised.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 03:12 AM
link   
I dropped Trump over this

he is singing the false song of globalism

I think he means he supports Israeli nationalism and globalism for everyone else.



edit on 1-5-2017 by oddnutz because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 03:21 AM
link   
He is star on his own reality show. Show that target hillbilly audience.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 03:33 AM
link   
a reply to: SoulSurfer

i Don't know whats wrong with being a National Globalist.

Its like the left doesnt understand the complexity of a real persons mind. They only want straw men.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 03:47 AM
link   
They're two completely contradictory ideologies.

It is like someone claiming they are both a Revolutionary Socialist and a Capitalist.

A Nazi and a Communist

An Isolationist and an Imperialist.

It's just nonsensical doublethink on Trump's behalf.
edit on -050003am5kam by Ohanka because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 04:10 AM
link   

edit on 1 5 2017 by surnamename57 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 04:14 AM
link   
Of course he's a globalist. He has business interests across the globe. That's the definition of Globalist. He's quickly becoming a Neocon too.

What did people expect? He had no aspirations to being a Ron Paul acolyte. No Manhattan billionaire is going to be a populist.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 05:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: SoulSurfer

He's saying he's a national globalist.

Like, he supports nationalism on a global scale, sovereignty for each and every nation in the world and such.

No conspiracy, no flip flop, just more Trumpisms from Trump.


But that doesn't make sense, especially not with his actions.

If he really believed in "sovereignty for each & every nation in the world", then he'd believe that every sovereign nation could do whatever if wants in order to protect itself economically & militarily. That means he'd be ok with North Korea's nuclear program, Iran's alleged attempts to get nukes, and the official Syrian govt's actions to secure itself. Iran's entire argument during the nuclear power debate was that it's a sovereign nation.

He'd also be dismantling our global network of military bases & be against international sanctions against other countries. And how can he believe that every nation should be sovereign when he's promised to force Mexico to pay for his wall? That's a violation of Mexico's sovereignty. He'd also be against companies exploiting the resources of foreign countries because that's literally a violation of their sovereignty. He'd be pushing for the host countries to control & profit from their own resources since that would directly enhance the economic sovereignty of those countries. Globalist and nationalism are incompatible.

Another simple point is this: how can he enforce nationalism for every country in the world? What about the countries that don't want nationalism & instead are embracing membership in regional economies or the global economies? Will he actively oppose those countries for not embracing their own nationalism? If he's trying to pressure other countries to follow his idea, then doesn't that defeat the purpose?



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 05:55 AM
link   
a reply to: PistolPete

If you look at American policies from afar and a bit aside of the usual conflicting element of politics (versus policies), then it can be seen that the play book is written and the pathway is being followed by one and all if slightly altered and diverted according to party and personal whims of no great importance in the final analysis.

Clearly, what happened was that Obama and his massive, massive revamping of about every aspect of government and society toward his goal was too energetic and that the flow of society pushed too hard toward those goals resulted in the quite unexpected backlash of Trump winning. --Well, "DUH!" you say. What you should wonder is "Now what?"

The utopia dream that Obama sought all to quickly is still out there in the wings, slightly stalled and waiting to re-emerge. Trump came along just in time (probably, according to plan B). Trump will be the lightning rod to bear the strikes from the dissatisfied folks that put him into power. Disillusion will grow within the ranks of those individuals to become a visible backlash to their original backlash of voting him into office.

Frankly, Trump's day are number in the office as he comes to understand the simple fact that he is not in control, but merely the poster boy for the old ways that Obama was displacing at too fast of a clip. The growing thought among the masses will be, "Humm, maybe Obama wasn't so bad, was he, too swift to move, but not so bad?" We can expect Trump to eventually give up the office before his term is up. In that way, he will be saving face in the process by going by his choice and not having been rejected by the will of the people.

It won't be the democrats themselves exactly winning the next presidential election, it will be the will the people having flip-flopped over deciding that a more progressive course for society is better than nostalgic remembrances of old times.

Humans are eventually going to get the good and bad news that they are cosmic citizens worthy of some status over the lower animals but far down in hierarchy when it comes to intellectual enlightenment about themselves and the real masters of the universe. The puppet masters outside the fringes of our realm are growing impatient. They have an agenda and Obama was eagerly right on it. Trump not so much, too much personal ego to stay in the game that he doesn't rule.

You may be thinking that this post is about politics. It is not. It is simply about the tools that are used to change a society from one form to another. So don't take it personal.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 06:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ohanka
They're two completely contradictory ideologies.

It is like someone claiming they are both a Revolutionary Socialist and a Capitalist.

A Nazi and a Communist

An Isolationist and an Imperialist.

It's just nonsensical doublethink on Trump's behalf.


What is China then? Some people are not sure if they are male or female. It's a sign of the times. UN is always used for national interrests rather than some altruistic common good.
Note that you can use Infowars vid to tell you. Just saying.



posted on May, 1 2017 @ 06:34 AM
link   
He has got that "yuge" sail behind his back, wherever the wind blows, he goes!


Depends on the day, really.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<<   2 >>

log in

join