posted on Apr, 29 2017 @ 04:00 AM
a reply to: DISRAELI
I am not at all confused.
Regarding the dating that is according to scholars and refers to date of composition, 600 BC and later.
Daniel is 200BC
It's not confusing at all.
I wasn't confused about anything else either or never would have spoken.
Put simply, if written after the fact like Isaiah and the whole Tanakh was, and by a long time and not by the person it's attributed to, it's
pseudepigrapha by definition.
And not prophecy but pious fraud.
edit on 29-4-2017 by Disturbinatti because: (no reason given)
edit on 29-4-2017 by Disturbinatti because: (no reason