It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: continuousThunder
a reply to: Neith
in the name of snowflakery? what does that even mean? i honestly have no idea what you're going for there?
as for "them sticking their noses in ours", i'm not sure where you're from, but the country where i live is supposed to be open and accepting to all colours and creeds, a land where people are supposed to be free to practice their religion and their customs as they see fit. it's actually kind of held up as one of our defining attributes.
possibly we live in different countries.
we certainly appear to live in different worlds.
originally posted by: pteridine
originally posted by: continuousThunder
a reply to: Neith
in the name of snowflakery? what does that even mean? i honestly have no idea what you're going for there?
as for "them sticking their noses in ours", i'm not sure where you're from, but the country where i live is supposed to be open and accepting to all colours and creeds, a land where people are supposed to be free to practice their religion and their customs as they see fit. it's actually kind of held up as one of our defining attributes.
possibly we live in different countries.
we certainly appear to live in different worlds.
From "colours" I expect that you are in GB or a recent colony. Practice of religion and customs stops when it impinges on the religions and customs of the natives or breaks laws. My religion is "Cashism" and is one of cash, only. My religious worship requires that I rob banks and kill whomever gets in the way. I wear full body covering as part of my worship with a mask covering all but my eyes. Now you may ask immigrants to adapt to the host country and might even expect it, but my religion says I don't have to and that you are Cashophobic if you say otherwise. As part of my religion, I also abuse my women, whom I own body and soul, and you can't say anything about that either. Sometimes I need to kill one of my daughters to save the family honor from some inconsequential nonsense. It is worth it, of course, and since women are mere receptacles, it is no great loss relative to family honor. I am invading your country and will bend it anyway I want and if you say anything at all, you are an infidel and my religion says I have the right to eliminate you. After all, robbing banks is good for all. See below...
originally posted by: JDmOKI
originally posted by: Disturbinatti
originally posted by: Echo007
The Hijab aka headscarf is a symbol of oppression. Just like not allowing women to drive or travel without guardian's approval.
What next's, are we going to ask all women to dress like street hookers, all for solidarity sake.
That's a load of crap. About the hijab.
If it is their choice and they like it, as most Muslim women really do, it's not oppression.
The veil is oppression. Saudi Arabia is oppressive and guess what? It's under British-Zionist-American control and not the norm.
So who is doing the oppressing? Saudis and Persians. One loyal to the other enemy of, the West.
Otherwise women are not normally oppressed in Islam and you are under the influence of stereotypes and propaganda.
A dose of history and reality would do you well.
The hijab is cultural and not oppressive.
Hindu women wear a version of hijab too sometimes, it's no different.
I agree a religious text stating women are owned by their husbands and should wear a veil to stop men from lusting for them isnt Oppression. Try telling that to the women in my family.
I can't even date a Muslim girl because she's so weak a fragile Im the man and would force my non believer ways on her but a Muslim man can marry a non Muslim because he can force her to convert.
Don't claim to know history and Islam if you don't know the details and leave out the most important parts
Nope read it again he says the day will come when they Have to ask All women to wear the headscarf out of solidarity...
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: TOMFROMOZ
He doesn't say anything about forcing women to wear headscarves. He is talking about women expressing solidarity about allowing women to wear whatever they like.
Tolerant, but not stupid! Look, just because you have to tolerate something doesn't mean you have to approve of it!
If you had to like it, it'd be called the Museum of Acceptance!
"Tolerate" means you're just putting up with it!
You tolerate a crying child sitting next to you on the airplane or, or you tolerate a bad cold.
It can still piss you off!
Jesus Tapdancing Christ!
Mr Garrison, Death Camp of Tolerance.
originally posted by: Kali74
Weird. There's lots of Muslims elected and appointed into Western governments yet we still have no religious laws except ones with Christian overtones.
originally posted by: trollz
referring to discrimination against Muslims in Austria, the leader went on to state that "if this continues... with the widely spreading Islamophobia, the day will come when we have to ask all women to wear a headscarf – all – out of solidarity to those who do it for religious reasons."
/quote]
Its just the next part of the agenda for islam to absorb and breed out the white population.
originally posted by: AlexandrosTheGreat
originally posted by: JDmOKI
originally posted by: Disturbinatti
originally posted by: Echo007
The Hijab aka headscarf is a symbol of oppression. Just like not allowing women to drive or travel without guardian's approval.
What next's, are we going to ask all women to dress like street hookers, all for solidarity sake.
That's a load of crap. About the hijab.
If it is their choice and they like it, as most Muslim women really do, it's not oppression.
The veil is oppression. Saudi Arabia is oppressive and guess what? It's under British-Zionist-American control and not the norm.
So who is doing the oppressing? Saudis and Persians. One loyal to the other enemy of, the West.
Otherwise women are not normally oppressed in Islam and you are under the influence of stereotypes and propaganda.
A dose of history and reality would do you well.
The hijab is cultural and not oppressive.
Hindu women wear a version of hijab too sometimes, it's no different.
I agree a religious text stating women are owned by their husbands and should wear a veil to stop men from lusting for them isnt Oppression. Try telling that to the women in my family.
I can't even date a Muslim girl because she's so weak a fragile Im the man and would force my non believer ways on her but a Muslim man can marry a non Muslim because he can force her to convert.
Don't claim to know history and Islam if you don't know the details and leave out the most important parts
Don't forget the practice of thighing copied still by millions in Yemen, Oman, SA, the Emirates, etc which is copied from Mohammed so while ayisha was 6-9 before she became a woman, Mohammed would place his penis in the crest of her inner thigh and thrust. In fact just last week a guy in Yemen 50 something years old killed his five year old bride on their wedding night when thighing her and he claims he was tempted too much to penetrate her....her fault, the little Jezebel...and his penis did too much internal damage with his harsh thrusting. You can destroy your own property so he is simply back on the market ladies no charges.