It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Report: N. Korea may have sold uranium

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 3 2005 @ 09:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by transient

Originally posted by djohnsto77
Israel is not a signatory to the NPT.


NK was a signatory only from 94 to 02 so I’m at a loss as to how the IAEA is culpable here.



Our Point yet again. The world "thinks" the IAEA protects it from NUKE's in bad peoples hands. It can't because of it's diplomatic "roots" at the UN. Not being part of the NPT should be irrelevant to the issue.




posted on Feb, 3 2005 @ 09:34 AM
link   
Fair enough, the USSR contributed to the situation, but in your own words:


ABB built the reactors. N Korea used money provided by Clinton the great.


Therefore, going back to your earlier statement:


so it is left to the US to fix it


The US should therefore expect share the responsibility to ‘fix it’, no?

Perhaps that was the idea all along.



posted on Feb, 3 2005 @ 09:48 AM
link   


Our Point yet again. The world "thinks" the IAEA protects it from NUKE's in bad peoples hands. It can't because of it's diplomatic "roots" at the UN. Not being part of the NPT should be irrelevant to the issue.


So basically your point is that because of its diplomatic “roots” the IAEA is worse than nothing. Assuming you’re right then would the solution be a new worldwide organization with military “roots”, or should the US be in charge? Also, what would be the determinant factor as to who the “bad people” are… their religion affiliation maybe?












[edit on 3-2-2005 by transient]



posted on Feb, 3 2005 @ 09:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by DrHoracid
Here is more proof of why the UN needs to get out of the US. IAEA has screwed up yet again. How did they "miss" this one?


We let go the Pakistani scientist that did so much good work for our enemies and their programs. Why not hold Musharraf and him responsible for their wrongs against us? That is far worse.



posted on Feb, 3 2005 @ 09:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by EastCoastKid

Originally posted by DrHoracid
Here is more proof of why the UN needs to get out of the US. IAEA has screwed up yet again. How did they "miss" this one?


We let go the Pakistani scientist that did so much good work for our enemies and their programs. Why not hold Musharraf and him responsible for their wrongs against us? That is far worse.


A completely agree. Pakistain is not our friend. The radical "mullahs" could overthrow Musharraf at any minute. Kahn was let go and I don't know why either.........



posted on Feb, 3 2005 @ 09:58 AM
link   
It was a back room deal of sorts. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

If anyone should have been invaded it should've been our great ally Pakistan.



posted on Feb, 3 2005 @ 10:19 AM
link   
So according to this evidence it could also have come from Pakistan? In others words they don't know? In other words it could have come from a multitude of places.

Great evidence...cough.




top topics



 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join