It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Did they infringe on her right to speak yet?
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
I asked this before and I'll ask it again.
Hypothetically,
If they postponed her for eternity because of threats of violence,
Did they infringe on her right to speak yet?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
Berkeley students who were interviewed said that they support her right to speak at Berkeley.
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
I asked this before and I'll ask it again.
Hypothetically,
If they postponed her for eternity because of threats of violence,
Did they infringe on her right to speak yet?
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: Xtrozero
What is the reason for anything? Why believe the right-wing narrative? What if the Antifa have won and made everyone look bad in our eyes? What was the reason for paid rioters in the 60's? Making both sides look bad is nothing new.
Free speech means protecting everyone’s right to speak, including people you don’t agree with. How would you like it if you had an unpopular opinion and other people were trying to silence you? Isn't that censorship?
We oppose fascism by any means necessary.
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Sees like if people decide something is hate speech they decided thats not free speech. Ironically free speech is meant to protect hate speech. Things people agree with doesn't need protection from the masses. You cant claim to be for free speech and decide certain types of speech they decide is hate must not be heard
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: Deaf Alien
No, we are not, because we have nothing to do with The Berkeley Campus or Berkely.
"The smallest minority on earth is the individual.
Those who deny individual rights cannot
claim to be defenders of minorities."
- Ayn Rand