Congratulations! Ann Coulter finally silenced on Berkeley Campus

Isn't anarchist an oxymoron to begin with ?

Trying to exert authority over something/someone else when the word means basically rebelling against authority ?

By the anarchist own ideology no one has to listen to them or do what they say.

a reply to: peck420

So which is it? Were some of them students or not?

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

The claim made by one poster is that they are students at Berkeley. I want proof of that. Why is that difficult to understand?

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
So which is it? Were some of them students or not?

Did you even bother reading my entire post?

Try again.

I can't even hear these leftist arguments after a while, it just becomes white noise. I don't want to shut them out completely, but they never seem to bring up any good points imo. Arguments are so left field that they start to sound like whiny commie propaganda after a while.

a reply to: zazzafrazz

Awww that's cute.

Thanks, mom.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

you wish

a reply to: peck420

Yes I did and you claimed that the person who wrote that blog "stand to lose".

originally posted by: ConscienceZombie
Not really free speech if you have to be paid to say it. With that said, whatever she had to say probably wasn't worth it anyway.

Here we go, a "champion of free speech"... Or rather "a champion of free speech only belonging to his/her side". Of course such "champion of only his/her free speech" doesn't seem to mind if threats of violence are made to certain speakers because this poster claims that "whatever she has to say wasn't worth it."

BTW, zombie, you do know that leaders of leftist groups are also paid to make their irrational speeches all around the country right?... I guess "none of them were really free speeches" because you claim that being paid makes it "a non free speech event"?...

originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

you wish

I have less maternal wishes for you, my dear.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: peck420

Yes I did and you claimed that the person who wrote that blog "stand to lose".

UC Berkeley will be in a legal $hit storm if they say anything other than, "it wasn't one of ours" until it is definitively proven in a court of law. Insinuating guilt, by a 3rd party, is a libel lawyers wet dream.

Next time I will write the entire process out, in crayon, to make sure you can get it.

a reply to: peck420

This is why we had 8 years of obama, low information voters.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

BTW, zombie, you do know that leaders of leftist groups are also paid to make their irrational speeches all around the country right?.

Well as they say.

“The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly - it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.” ― Joseph Goebbels

www.goodreads.com...

Which is why the lack rational thought.

a reply to: peck420

Insulting others only make you look like an idiot.
And that was a student not an Berkeley official. Perhaps you need it written in crayon as well.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

Look its obvious what you people are doing, splitting hairs, death by 1000 cuts. Boiling the frog slowly instead of dropping it in. Whittling away freedoms until there are none but what you dictate. Just admit it. just come at us bro we're right here waiting for you.

a reply to: User1138

Huh? You want me to lie to you and tell you that I am against free speech so that it can fit your worldview?
There's Breitbart waiting for you ----------------->

a reply to: Deaf Alien

Coward

a reply to: User1138

Are you a paid shill? Because you are doing a good job at it. How much do they pay you?

Here's how I see it.

Some of us think that this is a free speech issue.

Some don't.

The ones that don't then can say that they are against this and still be for free speech if they don't recognize it as a free speech issue.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Here's how I see it.

Some of us think that this is a free speech issue.

Some don't.

The ones that don't then can say that they are against this and still be for free speech if they don't recognize it as a free speech issue.

I think it's fair to say they hold free speech to a lesser value than signalling their partisan allegiances.