It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96
Your comprehension of the 1st is atrocious.
I know.
I mean the gaul I have to begin reading at the beginning of paragraphs.
Are you divided into three parts?
Sure am.
Just like you are.
Id,Ego, and Super Ego.
Everyone is.
Aww ... a Freudian attempt to deflect from the fact that you don't know the difference between Gaul and gall.
originally posted by: geezlouise
a reply to: kaylaluv
That's very curious though, like did Berkly decide that they could handle the protesters on X day at X venue, but not at Y venue? What would have made the difference? I wonder. Less promotion? A venue in a more remote area, less populated? What would have made it safer???
I'm honestly just curious.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96
Your comprehension of the 1st is atrocious.
I know.
I mean the gaul I have to begin reading at the beginning of paragraphs.
Are you divided into three parts?
Sure am.
Just like you are.
Id,Ego, and Super Ego.
Everyone is.
Aww ... a Freudian attempt to deflect from the fact that you don't know the difference between Gaul and gall.
FYI.
Can't win an argument.
Correct their grammar.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: kaylaluv
And Berkeley suggested because of the violence of weak leftists who can't stand different opinions.
Why would a date change cause violent leftists to calm down?
originally posted by: geezlouise
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
That's valid AF I didn't even think about that.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: geezlouise
a reply to: kaylaluv
That's very curious though, like did Berkly decide that they could handle the protesters on X day at X venue, but not at Y venue? What would have made the difference? I wonder. Less promotion? A venue in a more remote area, less populated? What would have made it safer???
I'm honestly just curious.
According to the chancellor, it had to do with the amount of exits and other small factors. One thing is certain, they didn't even try.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Gryphon66
Making a mountain out of sink hole.
Ever stop to think for once second that since France has been in the news lately it was just a simple mistake ?
After all France is the modern name for Gaul.
originally posted by: imwilliam
a reply to: Gryphon66
There's no irony in suggesting that violent protestors attempting to infringe on someone else's right to free speech and assembly should be met with violence. Irony would require that I advocated violence be used against peaceful protestors.
But for the record, I think there are a broad range of occasions, including many outside of the realm of self defense, when violence is an appropriate response.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: geezlouise
a reply to: kaylaluv
That's very curious though, like did Berkly decide that they could handle the protesters on X day at X venue, but not at Y venue? What would have made the difference? I wonder. Less promotion? A venue in a more remote area, less populated? What would have made it safer???
I'm honestly just curious.
According to the chancellor, it had to do with the amount of exits and other small factors. One thing is certain, they didn't even try.
As another member said, that is a very valid reason. And I would say that they tried considering they offered her another time/date to accommodate the needs.
originally posted by: imwilliam
Berkeley should have the right to control the venue so they can control the violence.
Not really. The violence shouldn't be controlled, it should be prosecuted. And the safety of the violent "protestors" should be a secondary consideration to the protection of the right to free speech.
If a few heads have to be cracked in order to protect free speech, then so be it.
I never said it would cause them to calm down. Having an indoor venue at a time when less people would be there will allow Berkeley to better manage any issues.