It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: seagull
Amazing.
A group, or groups, invite someone to speak--a right protected by the Constitution. OK, so far...
Another group, or groups, threaten violence is that same person is allowed to speak... Why are any of you OK with this. Oh, it's Ann Coulter, squeaky voice and all, so it's OK. She's a provocateur, so it's OK to threaten violence.
No. No, it isn't.
UC Berkeley is an institute of higher learning, yet some of its students, by their behavior, seem to still be in the Jungle.
Oh, that's right, I keep forgetting... It's Ann Coulter, so it's OK.
Tell me, who wouldn't it be OK for?
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Argue away, it won't stop us.
I would like to point out, we are not running around punching random "Trump Supporters". I would also like to point out, these Neo-fascist groups were the ones signaling for violence the last two "Rallies"
originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: underwerks
Do you know how many police are here
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: underwerks
Again, the YAF specifically said "violent agitators". That should factor into your argument at the very least.
She didnt refuse to show. Her sponsors asked that she cancel the speech because THEY feared the violence.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: underwerks
Again, the YAF specifically said "violent agitators". That should factor into your argument at the very least.
I believe the YAF would label anyone protesting that disagrees with them as "violent agitators" if it serves their purpose at the moment.
They don't have the greatest track record, as a little bit of research on YAF shows.
Argue away, it won't stop us.
Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism[1][2], characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and control of industry and commerce[3]
Fascists believe that liberal democracy is obsolete, and they regard the complete mobilization of society under a totalitarian one-party state as necessary to prepare a nation for armed conflict and to respond effectively to economic difficulties.[8]
I believe the YAF would label anyone protesting that disagrees with them as "violent agitators" if it serves their purpose at the moment.
Do you want to keep avoiding the question?