It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Congratulations! Ann Coulter finally silenced on Berkeley Campus

page: 29
86
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I don't care about UC Berkely because we have nothing to do with them, or them with us. they can be as "Liberal" or "Republican" as they want




posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 02:58 PM
link   
a reply to: underwerks

I do not support the people who want to kill other people.

That is stupid.

I support free speech.

It's really simple.



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 02:59 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Would you support the right for radical ISIS members who let's say are "legal citizens" to assemble and speak about their views?



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 02:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: DBCowboy

Celebrate! you support the right for ISIS to assemble and speak freely here!




We know ANTIFA does.

Something one would know if they bothered to read.



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 02:59 PM
link   
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

No, I am not, I'm using a hypothetical situation to see how far you support "Muh Free Speech"



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

So I am not on the left? I am actually a centrist? Wow.



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: DBCowboy

Would you support the right for radical ISIS members who let's say are "legal citizens" to assemble and speak about their views?


If radical Islamic terrorists want to discuss how they want to kill unbelievers, will you be serving coffee?



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: DBCowboy

Would you support the right for radical ISIS members who let's say are "legal citizens" to assemble and speak about their views?



Mom says it's time for you to come upstairs and take out the trash if you want your friends to sleepover.



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Who is happy about it? I don't see anyone here happy about censoring free speech. Are you seeing things that aren't there?



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: underwerks

I do not support the people who want to kill other people.

That is stupid.

I support free speech.

It's really simple.


So you support the liberal protestors here who were exercising their right to protest.

Could have fooled me.



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: DBCowboy

Would you support the right for radical ISIS members who let's say are "legal citizens" to assemble and speak about their views?


If radical Islamic terrorists want to discuss how they want to kill unbelievers, will you be serving coffee?


Who knew.

The only right wing neocons clinging to their guns and religion the FAKE LEFT won't protest over.

AKA Islamofascists.
edit on 27-4-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Indigo5

They are allowing threat and coercion to dictate who can speak, and where and when they can do it, instead of defending the rights of the speaker.

It's no one's fault but their own.


You still seem confused about the circumstances...

Anee Coulter CHOSE not to speak..Because the time and venue the University offered was not to her liking and the CONSERVATIVE group that was going to pay her, rescinded the offer.

It is not Berkeley's obligation to "Defend" Anne Coulter's bank balance..



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: DBCowboy

Would you support the right for radical ISIS members who let's say are "legal citizens" to assemble and speak about their views?


You wouldn't?



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Do you know we have Antifa comrades in Syria fighting ISIS now right?

itsgoingdown.org...

itsgoingdown.org...

and "The International Revolutionary People’s Guerrilla Forces"



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Deaf Alien

What



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:07 PM
link   
Amazing.

A group, or groups, invite someone to speak--a right protected by the Constitution. OK, so far...

Another group, or groups, threaten violence is that same person is allowed to speak... Why are any of you OK with this. Oh, it's Ann Coulter, squeaky voice and all, so it's OK. She's a provocateur, so it's OK to threaten violence.

No. No, it isn't.

UC Berkeley is an institute of higher learning, yet some of its students, by their behavior, seem to still be in the Jungle.

Oh, that's right, I keep forgetting... It's Ann Coulter, so it's OK.

Tell me, who wouldn't it be OK for?



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:07 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Why would we support an ideology that supports hierarchal structure of suppression and control?



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

No, I am not, I'm using a hypothetical situation to see how far you support "Muh Free Speech"


That's a really stupid hypothetical question because that's like comparing an apple to a watermelon. In fact, ISIS has more in common with the left.



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: XAnarchistX

Thanks for some more cognitive dissonance.

ISIS is nothing more than Saudis version blackwater fighting Irans Hezbollah version of blackwater.

Islamofascsts fighting other Islamofascists.

In the worlds longest,bloody middle east version of the Hatfields and McCoys.



posted on Apr, 27 2017 @ 03:08 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Do you want to keep avoiding the question?




top topics



 
86
<< 26  27  28    30  31  32 >>

log in

join