It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JADESTONE
Native Indian population before they were prosecuted: 100 milion
Native Indian population now: 2 million (approx)
Originally posted by Souljah
yep,
this is america.
founded by blood and guts...
Originally posted by Gazrok
Native Indian population before they were prosecuted: 100 milion
Native Indian population now: 2 million (approx)
The above arguments not withstanding....
That isn't taking into account the 200 YEARS of assimilation into the populace...there are plenty more Native Americans who aren't in that 2 million number, but they are simply mixed with other races so you aren't going to see it... THAT'S how it went from 100 million to 2 million. The above is trying to erroneously assume that 98 million Native Americans (i.e. not Native Indians, hehe...) were the victims of genocide. That simply isn't true. Many simply chose to leave and mix with the population over two centuries....
Originally posted by Flinx
It's interesting that every minority but blacks have been given the option of assimilation.
Originally posted by JADESTONE
I admit I went overboard on the language ,greatest genocide perhaps not
Originally posted by jawapunk
They say to ignore history is to be doomed to repeat it, therefore i believe it answers the question as to why discuss any of this. Also, it is an important and necessary aspect of humnanity to look at where we have come from and see how we have improved or not.
Wouldn't that be tantamount to saying that it never happened when you don't think it relevant or 'current' to discuss?
I don't think discussing it has anyting to do with placing blame on the current system nor on people today, the fact of the matter is though with our current moral and ethical values we believe that illegally displaced peoples deserve to be treated with respect and compensated for their losses, infact that is part of international law today and currently being seen in Cyprus. I won't go into details as to that, but I do believe and I think the world at large believes that something is owed to native americans for what has happened to them. I am suprised that similar benefits were not offered to African Americans that can prove their lineage has descended from slaves.
[edit on 3-2-2005 by jawapunk]
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by JADESTONE
Native Indian population before they were prosecuted: 100 milion
Native Indian population now: 2 million (approx)
Can you prove there were 100 million NA's living here before other countries came. I would like to see you prove those numbers.
Sorry no NA sites allowed when answering, they tend to blow things into something they are not.
Before you try and flame me, let me tell you I am 1/8th NA so I have nothing against my heritage. I would just like to see some proven facts and figures. Thank you...............
Originally posted by Jedi_Master
Folks...I've just got a question...
Just how is the current population of the US responsible for the actions of what happened a couple of hundred years ago ???
I mean don't get me wrong, these things did happen, but how can the current population be held responsible ?
And if they can't...why discuss it ?
It sounds like more racial bashing to me...
We who survive demand justice.
Originally posted by JADESTONE
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by JADESTONE
Native Indian population before they were prosecuted: 100 milion
Native Indian population now: 2 million (approx)
Can you prove there were 100 million NA's living here before other countries came. I would like to see you prove those numbers.
Sorry no NA sites allowed when answering, they tend to blow things into something they are not.
Before you try and flame me, let me tell you I am 1/8th NA so I have nothing against my heritage. I would just like to see some proven facts and figures. Thank you...............
sorry but they did not have demographic census at that time but this is the figure that most scholar agree upon.
Again I stress is the number that important.
Which scholars would those be? Have any names?
If the number was not important to me, I would not have asked for confirmation.
I have a friend of a friend whose uncle heard from his aunt that the numbers were not that high. Get my point; that was meant as a joke.
Anyone can take hearsay and make it into unreliable numbers. In addition your numbers did not account for those that assimilated into the general American culture on their own as is my case.
The way you tried to make it sound is that Americans are solely responsible for the low numbers at this time when they were not.
[edit on 2/4/2005 by shots]
[edit on 2/4/2005 by shots]
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
All I want to know is when will the government pay me reparitions for forcing my great X 4 grandfather to release his slaves after abolition? I figure the amount has got to be in the millions; adjusted for inflation.
Originally posted by cryptorsa1001
Lets see in america I think the Spanish started killing Indians first then it was the british and the french and the mexicans and the indians liked to kill each other and then the americans after they killed british soldiers and then french and then mexicans and indians, all the while indians were killing all of the previously mentioned groups of people.
So now who owes who an apology?
Originally posted by mpeake
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
All I want to know is when will the government pay me reparitions for forcing my great X 4 grandfather to release his slaves after abolition? I figure the amount has got to be in the millions; adjusted for inflation.
Am I the only one who caught this? Wow! I haven't heard that one before.