It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama To Receive $400,000 Speaking Fee

page: 12
11
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: zazzafrazz

Ya know that supposed evil one percent that supposedly doesn't pay their fair share.

All the while IGNORING constitutional rights that preserve property rights.


lol.

Well, I'll send that one percent your socialist comments, I'm sure they will thank you:




No one deserves 400k to speak





So what part of $400k speaking fee is someone missing ?
Hello.
Economic inequality





Innequality

More money than a waitress will ever see.






For nothing sure been lot of people trying to excuse greedy capitalist behavior.






Obama didn't build that $400,000 speaking fee.

Lots of people worked their snips off for it.




posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:30 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96


Rich people are a minority.

TECHNICALLY this is true, but for legal purposes it is just pure arrogance. Rich people are NOT an oppressed minority by any stretch of the imagination. Even under Obama's Presidency. Again he BAILED out the crooks who crashed the economy and didn't even push jail time for them. Why are you pretending like this didn't happen?


And have the same constitutional rights as everyone else.

I never said they didn't.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: zazzafrazz




Was he in business with Trump University?


Now that's an example of political trolling.


As opposed to lame Obama memes in a poitical trolling thread in the political mud pit.

Gotcha.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6




Since he hasn't even received the money yet we don't know if he's paying his fair share on it or not.


Yes we do.

18.7 % Obama's doesn't pay his fair share all the while whining about other people that supposedly don't.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Then explain to me why such a 'worthless' thread has garnered over 200 posts ?

After all O getting $400k is meaningless.


200 posts.

9 flags.

Whomp whomp whomp.




posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yeah K.

Rich people are a minority.

And have the same constitutional rights as everyone else.

Deal.







Except Obama right? Why he not allowed to be rich too?



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Shamrock6




Since he hasn't even received the money yet we don't know if he's paying his fair share on it or not.


Yes we do.

18.7 % Obama's doesn't pay his fair share all the while whining about other people that supposedly don't.

So you just proved that Obama pays his fair share and you are full of #. Thanks for that.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:37 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

It's 2017 Neo. You're going back a couple of years to try and prove a point about something that hasn't even happened yet in 2017.

You can't reference something specific to 2017 that hasn't happened yet but then try to point back to something that happened a couple of years ago as somehow proving you right about the thing that hasn't even happened. That's not how memes work.



PS - that's how memes work.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:37 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t




TECHNICALLY this is true, but for legal purposes it is just pure arrogance. Rich people are NOT an oppressed minority by any stretch of the imagination.


That deserves a gold medal for mental gymastics!

'Technically' they DO have the right to their property, who cares!

That post was pure arrogance.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: zazzafrazz




Was he in business with Trump University?


Now that's an example of political trolling.


As opposed to lame Obama memes in a poitical trolling thread in the political mud pit.

Gotcha.


If this thread is so beneath you why post in it ?



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: zazzafrazz

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Yeah K.

Rich people are a minority.

And have the same constitutional rights as everyone else.

Deal.







Except Obama right? Why he not allowed to be rich too?


That's been asked and answer for pages now.

Geezus.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Tax rates don't change.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:40 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

What's arrogant is propping up your thread on account of it having 200 some posts...

And leaving out the fact that over 60 of them are from yourself



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Krazysh0t




TECHNICALLY this is true, but for legal purposes it is just pure arrogance. Rich people are NOT an oppressed minority by any stretch of the imagination.


That deserves a gold medal for mental gymastics!

'Technically' they DO have the right to their property, who cares!

That post was pure arrogance.


No. I'm saying technically they are minority in that the they are minority subset of the total population of the US. They are NOT however a defined minority class of people. Also, stop pretending like I'm saying that they don't have constitutional rights. I never said that. For that SECOND time now.

FURTHERMORE, your thread is the one saying that Obama isn't entitled to $400k for speaking. You're the one who is arguing that rich people aren't entitled to their property. Or in this case, entitled for due compensation for services rendered.

Nice attempt to try to spin this on me though.

Neo on page 1:

No one deserves 400k to speak especially after railing on about the supposed evil one percent, and the so called high cost of education.

edit on 26-4-2017 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:41 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

No, but the amount of deductions and charitable contributions do



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Well.

Do you need a safe space from neo ?

Feeling triggered ?

I kind of have to post since I created it.

What's others excuse ?

After all it's a worthless thread.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Krazysh0t




TECHNICALLY this is true, but for legal purposes it is just pure arrogance. Rich people are NOT an oppressed minority by any stretch of the imagination.


That deserves a gold medal for mental gymastics!

'Technically' they DO have the right to their property, who cares!

That post was pure arrogance.



Go on tell us, Get it off your chest.
Answer us why you think that Obama is exempt from being rich?
Why is he not free to earn whatever income he wants.
How is capping Obama earnings or berating him for earning wealth as private citizen not going against what you say about about freedoms for the wealthy in this country.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:43 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

When all else fails, lash out feebly and attempt to put others on the defensive.



PS - you don't have to do anything. Much like you don't have to give Obama money to listen to him talk, you don't have to post in your self-proclaimed worthless thread. Nobody is holding a gun to your . and forcing you to type. Free will and all that.
edit on 26-4-2017 by Shamrock6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 10:58 AM
link   
I don't begrudge people their success. Someone sounds jelly.



posted on Apr, 26 2017 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Obviously you're only okay with it because you love Obama so much. It's all that cognitive dissonance "we lefties" have so much of.




top topics



 
11
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join