It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: sapien82
Im not sure about other parts of the US, but in Texas people seem to really anguish over where they live due to school districts. ...
originally posted by: SBMcG
a reply to: zosimov
I stand by my position that the use of "Ebonics" is an utterly useless and even destructive practice.
You can make all the semantic and "rich cultural diversity" arguments you leftists love to make, but that does not change the fact that people of any race with poor English skills limit their ability to find employment and achieve advancement going forward.
You can make all the semantic and "rich cultural diversity" arguments you leftists love to make
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: SBMcG
You can make all the semantic and "rich cultural diversity" arguments you leftists love to make
We "leftists" do NOT make this argument. We support quality education.
Please thoroughly investigate what we stand for. Don't be talkin trash on us.
originally posted by: Spider879
originally posted by: SBMcG
a reply to: zosimov
I stand by my position that the use of "Ebonics" is an utterly useless and even destructive practice.
You can make all the semantic and "rich cultural diversity" arguments you leftists love to make, but that does not change the fact that people of any race with poor English skills limit their ability to find employment and achieve advancement going forward.
Are you American?? then your English is not exactly the same as a Brit, or an Auzzie , the spelling and usage can vary widely, I don't care what your political stance is, guessing you fancy yourself a conservative, you don't know or want to know the story behind how and why such speech patterns develop then fine, whatever you think it ain't semantics or useless, how big is the music industry that makes billions off of it from Blues to Hiphop for over a century, in about a hindered yrs the language will evolve into something completely different, Shakespeare would have a difficult time understanding what the heck you and I are babbling about.
Need I say it again, I am against using Ebonics or any other dialect as a language of instruction, however useless it's certainly is not.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: prepared4truth
So, you would be against learning to speak, read and write in English, because you believe that it is a tool of an oppressor? I wonder then, why it was that America, a nation of people who had been oppressed with British guns, sought to take up the tools of their oppressors, the better to prevent their enslavement by a regime which cared nothing for them, sought it so hard, that the founders of the nation itself enshrined in its constitution the right to keep and bear those arms?
I wonder also, what it was that inspired Martin Luther King Jnr to learn to speak such perfect, beautiful English, the better to battle the tyrannical behaviour of the fundamentalist right during the civil rights movement? Surely, if your argument had any merit whatsoever, America would have shunned the gun, and MLK would have refused to orate in such astoundingly wonderful fashion?
It must also be said, that not only is your argument flawed, but if people in history had thought as you do, the present we are living in today would be a very different, and almost certainly worse place, with regards to rights and the way they are distributed amongst populations. It is certain that things could be better than they are, but the way that happens is by way of engagement, not division, education, not ignorance, a preparedness to share in common with others, language, music, theatre, culture itself. Cutting oneself off from ones fellow human beings, regardless of their colour of skin, or their political views, even refusing to engage with the language spoken in common with others, cannot do anything but harm a community, increase the level to which it is cut off from others. Being ostracised by those around you is a terrible thing, but it is far harder to correct a scenario in which you ostracise yourself.
The most inspiring and powerful figures in civil rights in the last hundred years, would not agree with your position on these matters, and the proof is that they stood out in the open, used the language you eschew as a weapon of liberation, in fact campaigned to ensure that people from their communities could have equal access to the education which permitted them to form arguments and persuade detractors. They did so, precisely because they knew that far from being a tool to oppress their communities with, a grasp of the language being spoken around them, was a shield against improper treatment, would give them better access to and understanding of the law, would permit them to make for themselves better careers, access higher education with more regularity, and free those people from the chains about their wrists, the better that they could make their way in the world, and gain the respect they deserved from those around them.
And here you are, crapping on their efforts? Without those efforts, those who used the language you eschew to power through the lies that were being told about people of colour, without the language MLK used to prove to the unenlightened, that actually, the people of colour were smart, capable, and hardworking, rather than accepting the evil propaganda of the KKK, without the language that civil rights leaders used to organise and inspire generations of young people of colour, the plight of that broader community in this day and age would be utterly appalling, would never have stepped out of the shadow of oppression during the civil rights era.
If you want to keep yourself in the dark, that is your lookout, but I find it highly inadvisable to propagate the idea that your choice has any logical merit to it, or will provide protection from oppression nearly as well as a proper grounding and a good education in communication with ALL members of the greater community of the world. In order that what communication occurs be of a high quality and well understood outside of the rarefied confines of one community, one must accept that standardised language is necessary and desirable. A solid ability to read, write and speak English as she is known throughout more than half the world, is a gateway far more akin to a ticket to freedom, than it ever is another shackle around a pair of ankles.
originally posted by: prepared4truth
a reply to: crazyewok
You forgot the fourth option, silly.
4. We could follow your example by doing what you did to the Native Americans who held this country before you.
originally posted by: prepared4truth
a reply to: crazyewok
You forgot the fourth option, silly.
4. We could follow your example by doing what you did to the Native Americans who held this country before you.