It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is a Giant Earthquake About to Occur??

page: 1
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:46 AM
link   
I realize there are notepads of 1000 things I could post a thread about rather than this, but this is the only truly time sensitive issue so I'm going to go ahead and bring it up as a thread.

Less than one hour ago it occurred to me as I was studying all sorts of random things on Google Trends, we're overdue for a large devastating quake. It's been awhile and things are TOO QUIET.

This is just common sense and the result of an epiphany I had, including a sense of urgency to tell someone.
I realize that one just occurred in Chile about 4 or 5 hours ago right off the coast, I looked up the topic "earthquakes" just to take a look at things to see what's been going on more specifically than the Trends webpages would express.

The point of me posting this is a Scientific Experiment for my own personal purposes. I just want to see if my reasoning is correct and if I am in tune with the flow of energy surrounding me. I could be wrong, I'm wrong about a lot of stuff, it's not a big deal.

But if I'm right? Well then I'll know I've got great timing.

What time duration? I dunno.
Let's say sometime before my 36th birthday, June 7th.
All I'm saying is that it's too quiet and logic dictates that something's gotta give.
I'm talking like 7.7 or bigger. Something significant.

Just posting this for future notice.
Not meant to be be an important thread.
Can't believe I'm even gonna post this....




posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:50 AM
link   
Hopefully it won't be the New Madrid fault because I'm really nearby and I'd definitely notice that one.

I'm sure everyone near a major fault line hopes the same.
Don't blame ya.

Cross your fingers...



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:51 AM
link   
It's always too quiet.


I don't mind quiet. It's noise that bothers me.

edit on 4/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash
What time duration? I dunno.
Let's say sometime before my 36th birthday, June 7th.
All I'm saying is that it's too quiet and logic dictates that something's gotta give.
I'm talking like 7.7 or bigger. Something significant.

Magnitude 7.0+ earthquakes happen somewhere a little over once a month on average, so that's a pretty safe prediction.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:52 AM
link   
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

8.0+, about 1 per year.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: muzzleflash
What time duration? I dunno.
Let's say sometime before my 36th birthday, June 7th.
All I'm saying is that it's too quiet and logic dictates that something's gotta give.
I'm talking like 7.7 or bigger. Something significant.

Magnitude 7.0+ earthquakes happen somewhere a little over once a month on average, so that's a pretty safe prediction.


Well before June 7th and it has to be over 7.7 - so 777.
That was my subconscious numerology revealing itself.

Maybe....

I'm just saying this has to be a significant quake.
It's threshold requirement would be to make global news headlines.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:55 AM
link   
Could be right but think the earthquake is gonna be a lucky shot by a sneaky Korean sub dropping a Nuke on ur head, kinda feel that coming maybe?



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
It's always too quiet.


I don't mind quiet. It's noise that bothers me.


I enjoy the quiet too.

In fact where I am it get so quiet that I can hear the silence.
It's deafening.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

8.0+, about 1 per year.

So 7.0+ ~12 per year, 8.0+ ~1 per year....Let's say ~2 per year then for 7.7+....Had a 7.7 in December......Still a safe bet.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:58 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash




It's threshold requirement would be to make global news headlines.

A 5 in New York would do that. A 6 in Los Angeles has done that.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 12:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

8.0+, about 1 per year.


I'm not sure if I should include the requirement that it will devastate a largely populated area or not.
Since I went ahead and made a prediction than maybe it'd be fine to go ahead and say sure... it'll rock a big city hard.
Why not?

The odds seem about 50/50 right now.
Pretty good time to make a prediction.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 01:00 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

Fair enough. 2 data points to be met. Time and magnitude.
But from 7.7 to 8.0+ is a big difference, as you are aware.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 01:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash




It's threshold requirement would be to make global news headlines.

A 5 in New York would do that. A 6 in Los Angeles has done that.




Good points.

I'm not a seismology historian though.
In fact, without looking, I don't remember the magnitudes of a single quake in history specifically.
I could make generalized guesstimates though.

The number I gave out was just a vague arbitrary number.
You know what I mean though hopefully.
This quake will make headlines. We're overdue.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 01:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash

Fair enough. 2 data points to be met. Time and magnitude.
But from 7.7 to 8.0+ is a big difference, as you are aware.



Yes somewhat.

Doesn't it double in energy or something like that each .1 it increases?
I won't cheat and look it up this time.
That's just what I vaguely remember.

Geophysics isn't exactly my thing though I do have a passing interest in it.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 01:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash
This quake will make headlines. We're overdue.

Here's a 7.1 that made headlines a few hours ago. No devastation though.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 01:05 AM
link   
A 9.0+ would be "significant" on the grand scale. Anything less would be way less disastrous than what happened in Japan in 2011. That was biblical scale, IMO.

A 7.7 would suck in Los Angeles or NZ. But it's the big tamales in the ocean that cause huge tsunamis which cause whole coastal cities to evacuate, and places across the globe to be affected by the ripples that leave humanity awe-stricken.

I think we will always see 7.0+ EQ's happen, they always do. Every year. Even 8+. They aren't really that rare, or a threat when looking at the big picture.

If we start seeing waves of EQ's beyond the 8.0 range, then it's time to worry.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 01:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

8.0+, about 1 per year.

So 7.0+ ~12 per year, 8.0+ ~1 per year....Let's say ~2 per year then for 7.7+....Had a 7.7 in December......Still a safe bet.


Cool.
Sorta.

Muzzle needs a new pair of shoes!
**Rolls dice**



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 01:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash
Doesn't it double in energy or something like that each .1 it increases?
I won't cheat and look it up this time.
That's just what I vaguely remember.

Not exactly. It's a logarithmic scale. See here.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 01:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: muzzleflash
This quake will make headlines. We're overdue.

Here's a 7.1 that made headlines a few hours ago. No devastation though.


Yeah I referred to that one in the OP.
It happened about 3 hours prior to me coming up with this idea that we are overdue.
So I went and googled recent big quakes and found that one.



posted on Apr, 25 2017 @ 01:09 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

It's a logarithmic scale. A 8.0 packs almost 3 times as much energy as an 7.7. Either one (or a weaker one) in a population center, anywhere, is going to be a big deal.


Going purely by the odds, you have a fair chance. But are you going to claim an ocean spanning tsunami, even if the earthquake itself is not a big deal?

edit on 4/25/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
12
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join