It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Debbie Schlussel claims host Sean Hannity invited her back to his hotel room

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 23 2017 @ 10:40 PM
link   
Looks like they are going after Sean Hannity now. Though this one is pretty weak, let's see if we start having people coming out of the woodwork to accuse him of something. Let's see what CNN and MSDNC have on this tomorrow.


www.nydailynews.com...




Former Fox News contributor Debbie Schlussel claims that host Sean Hannity sexually harassed her.

Schlussel said on the Pat Campbell Podcast Friday that Hannity repeatedly invited her back to his hotel room during an event they were at together in Detroit. Schlussel did not say on the podcast when the event took place.

Schlussel has frequently written about Hannity on her personal blog, including a 2007 accusation that he plagiarized from her column.

Schlussel previously accused the Fox News anchor’s Freedom Concerts charity, which raised money for military families, of being a scam.

Her sexual harassment accusation comes just days after Fox News host Bill O’Reilly was fired after allegations of sexual harassment, abuse and racial discrimination from former female co-workers, following the revelation that he and the network had paid more than $13 million in settlements to five women.




And Hannity has already responded:

In a statement to the Daily News, Hannity denied all accusations.



“LET ME BE CLEAR THE COMMENTS ABOUT ME ON A RADIO SHOW THIS WEEK by this individual ARE 100% false and a complete fabrication. This individual is a serial harasser who has been lying about me for well over a decade. The individual has a history of making provably false statements against me in an effort to slander, smear and besmirch my reputation,” he said.

“The individual has not just slandered me over the years but many people who this individual disagrees with. This individual desperately seeks attention by any means necessary, including making unfounded personal attacks and using indefensible and outrageous political rhetoric."



edit on 23-4-2017 by infolurker because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 23 2017 @ 10:45 PM
link   
a reply to: infolurker


MSDNC?

roflmao



posted on Apr, 23 2017 @ 10:48 PM
link   
a reply to: seeker1963

The podcast: Only 8 mins, her story on it in her own words.

art19.com...



posted on Apr, 23 2017 @ 10:49 PM
link   
Debbie Schlussel? I haven't heard that name since the left tarred and feathered her for being anti-Islamic.



posted on Apr, 23 2017 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Glenn Beck called this out last week.

www.glennbeck.com...





Rupert Murdoch was part of that, but his children and wives hate Fox News. “They are embarrassed by the Fox News Channel. They’re not conservatives by any stretch of the imagination. And the big thing when I was there was, as soon as Rupert is gone, the kids are going to take over Fox News and they’re just going to clean house and stop this nonsense,”


“You better make a decision, America. Because you’re about to lose a big conservative ally and voice. And it’s not just Bill O’Reilly. I’m telling you, Sean Hannity will be next. Then Tucker Carlson will be next. Until everyone complies with what they say is not misinformation, they will continue to go. And once you have the big bear of Fox News out of the way, then they come for TheBlaze. Then they come for The Daily Wire. Then they come for all of us,” Glenn said.




posted on Apr, 23 2017 @ 11:12 PM
link   
This Debbie gal sounds like someone you want to stay far away from. I do know people like that. They make up things and spread rumors. Usually they are all bark and no bite. But that doesn't mean that nobody believes what they say. Usually people who know them know not to believe them but it is different with strangers.



posted on Apr, 23 2017 @ 11:42 PM
link   
So trying to pick up a chick is SEXUAL HARASSMENT.



posted on Apr, 23 2017 @ 11:50 PM
link   
In today's world? Sadly yes it is, and it's even recommended to get written contracts before sex. This has been pushed on college campuses a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss




posted on Apr, 23 2017 @ 11:51 PM
link   
Have any of you actually seen this lady? Ain't no one trying to bring her back to their hotel room.



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 12:39 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Ditto, agree with you there.

Even just talking to a woman now, can be construed as "Harassment".

That topic deserves it own thread....

Ok, who's game to start one?......Not Me....



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 03:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: sooth
Have any of you actually seen this lady? Ain't no one trying to bring her back to their hotel room.


You can't be serious. You really think that only specific physical types of women get flirted with or sexually harassed? I'm guessing you don't know that one of the most frequently raped and molested demographics are physically handicapped females.

For the record, I absolutely loathe Schlussel because she's an Islamophobic bigot. But I still don't think she deserves to be sexually harassed (assuming it happened). I think it's smart for everyone involved to get the facts first before instantly attacking the alleged victim or alleged perpetrator.
edit on 24-4-2017 by enlightenedservant because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 04:05 AM
link   
He only asked .... She had her right to agree or refuse

So where's her problem


She was not forced

Therefor none of her rights were abused. So where's her problem


Attention seeker



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 04:28 AM
link   
a reply to: eletheia

Wrong. As I posted in another thread about this topic, here's the legal definition of "sexual harassment".


Sexual Harassment

It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.

Harassment does not have to be of a sexual nature, however, and can include offensive remarks about a person’s sex. For example, it is illegal to harass a woman by making offensive comments about women in general.

Both victim and the harasser can be either a woman or a man, and the victim and harasser can be the same sex.

Although the law doesn’t prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not very serious, harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted).

The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or someone who is not an employee of the employer, such as a client or customer.

What's that saying, "ignorance of the law is no excuse"?
edit on 24-4-2017 by enlightenedservant because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 04:59 AM
link   
a reply to: enlightenedservant

Its illegal to harass a woman by making offensive comments about women in general? lolwut

Bishes be crazy.

Let the lawsuits begin!



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 05:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: enlightenedservant
Wrong.
It is unlawful to harass a person (an applicant or employee) because of that person’s sex. Harassment can include “sexual harassment” or unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical harassment of a sexual nature.


Until an 'advance' is rejected, how does one know if it is welcome or not?

It has to be rejected before one realises it is not a welcome request.




Harassment does not have to be of a sexual nature, however, and can include offensive remarks about a person’s sex. For example, it is illegal to harass a woman by making offensive comments about women in general.


One persons offence is another's truth ..... political correct madness at

its best ... grow a thicker skin and stop being a sjw wimp!!!




Although the law doesn’t prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that are not very serious,


So it is subjective .... depending on the perceiver?



harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted).


Obviously .... some people cant take NO for an answer



The harasser can be the victim's supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or someone who is not an employee of the employer, such as a client or customer.
What's that saying, "ignorance of the law is no excuse"?



OH ... and theres another saying *The law is an ass*

Political correctness too is an ass

edit on 24-4-2017 by eletheia because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 05:35 AM
link   
RE: "“LET ME BE CLEAR THE COMMENTS ABOUT ME ON A RADIO SHOW THIS WEEK by this individual ARE 100% false and a complete fabrication. "

I don't know. Where there's smoke there's fire. They would not have published the story if it were not true.



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 05:37 AM
link   
a reply to: MagnaCarta2015

Ignorance of the law is no excuse.



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 05:42 AM
link   
a reply to: eletheia



Until an 'advance' is rejected, how does one know if it is welcome or not? It has to be rejected before one realises it is not a welcome request.

Nope. Companies warn employees not to flirt or date on the job precisely for this reason. They're paying you to work, not to flirt. If employees want to meet up after work and then flirt, that's perfectly legal.



One persons offence is another's truth ..... political correct madness at its best ... grow a thicker skin and stop being a sjw wimp!!!

(Yawn) Or you can just learn the law and follow it? It has nothing to do with political correctness. Ironically, I'd expect the supposed "family values" crowd to support these laws since it gives a legal recourse when employers try to coerce their daughters and wives while they're on the job.



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 08:24 AM
link   
Maybe Debbie is the one who actually asked Sean Hannity out or hit on him.....and he turned her down( wife and kids and all ) ....now she's pissed and making his life a living hell.



posted on Apr, 24 2017 @ 09:37 PM
link   
LOL

BREAKING : After Hannity Threatens to Sue, Accuser Backtracks, NOW Says He did NOT Sexually Harass Her


“I never thought I was sexually harassed by Sean Hannity, I thought he was weird and creepy not someone I liked,” Schlussel said.





new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join