It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What?! Nuclear Hoax

page: 5
11
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 19 2019 @ 02:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96
Unfortunately they are very real.

You can't fake HEMP,NEMP effects.

They sure didn't fake Nagaski and Hiroshima.

They sure didn't fake those underground tests all over the world, and atolls in the worlds oceans.

The holy grail af two bit tyrants.

Pandora's box that should have never been open.



How do you know that they didn't fake the bombs in WW2?




posted on Jul, 21 2019 @ 03:21 AM
link   
The cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima were destroyed by fire bombing, just like half of Tokyo was, a bit earlier on.

Nobody saw images of Tokyo after it was fire-bombed, back then. It was deliberately held from the public. Only recently, we've been able to see those images.

Compare the images of Tokyo after the fire-bombing to images of Nagasaki and Hiroshima after they were 'nuked'.

The destruction of Tokyo is exactly the same as those two cities we've all seen images of, many times.


I had always wondered why Hiroshima and Nagasaki still had bridges and a few buildings remain intact, after they were 'nuked'. The reason is that the bridges and buildings were made of steel, or concrete, or brick.

If a nuke was dropped on the cities, these structures were at ground zero, and would have been flattened, like all the rest was. But they were intact, and that's proof the cities were NOT 'nuked', but fire-bombed, just like Tokyo was.


Nothing would remain intact from an atomic bomb, if it existed, as they claim. How can a multi-story building stand intact among all the ruins, if it was 'nuked'? Not a chance in hell.

The reason those cities were flattened was because almost all the structures were made of wood, straw, and foliage. That's why it all was burned into little pieces. That's why the trees remained standing, but the leaves were gone. Anything of wood, etc. was all charred black.

But we all believed they were destroyed by a new, incredibly powerful weapon, the Atomic Bomb! Nobody had ever seen such destruction before. That's why they didn't show Tokyo after it was fire-bombed, at the time, or many years later, either. If people had seen Tokyo after that, and know it was the result of fire-bombing, it would not look any different when they saw Hiroshima or Nagasaki afterwards. Even if they said they were 'nuked', it would not convince everyone, or might not, anyway. People could point out how Tokyo was like that, to others, and so forth. Not good for a hoax, then.



If you look at videos of it, you'll notice that the mushroom clouds are spliced in. They even put two separate mushroom clouds together, to look like one massive cloud. It's obvious to see two clouds are there, not one. Another problem - the mushroom clouds only appear after they have started to expand. And they are not shown hitting the cities, either. Because they were faking it all.

Do you really think they wouldn't have filmed it from the very start? When it first hit the cities, and flattened everything around it, and expanded upward into a mushroom cloud? Of course they would have. They'd have filmed it in color, and many angles, too. Consider how this event was unprecedented, and filmed in grainy black & white, while they filmed all sorts of trivial things, like a soldier shaving, in full color!!

'Let's destroy two entire cities with our new, incredible weapon, which nobody knew existed! And let's shoot a little footage to document the historical event, that changes the entire world....in black & white, with a #ty camera!!'


Hilarious.

edit on 21-7-2019 by turbonium1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 06:09 PM
link   
The nuclear scare that western media is trying to report during the past few days , trying to blame the "Skyfall" missile is demented. That missile might have actually never failed any test. Aside from that , dragging the Siberian soviet-era ammo depot decoy is even more retarded.
How is NATO going to explain another catastrophic failure of its foreign and military policy in the coming weeks I don't know , but I guess that "fireworks" kinda help the "THINKERS" at NATO ...

It's the same as with Bulava ... as already said ! They all fail and show funny videos and failing pictures, until NATO in 2013 made a "mistake" and got it's ass handed over to them in less than 3 months ...



posted on Aug, 13 2019 @ 06:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Flanker86

You mean like when your amazing Russia found out that most of their weapons didn't work nearly as well as they thought? But please, tell us how NATO "got it's ass handed over to them in less than 3 months ..."



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 03:27 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

So according to you, the Earth is flat with the Moon and Sun circling above it under a dome with a Ice Wall in Antarctica that nobody is allowed to go to, we never went to the Moon and the landings were all faked, gravity is fake and now so are nukes.

Please, get a grip on reality, man.



posted on Aug, 14 2019 @ 11:33 AM
link   
a reply to: turbonium1

I bet if you ruled the world every day would be the first day of spring too.

Your entire post is argument from ignorance and if I ran the zoo. It has no substance, no supporting evidence, and proves nothing other than your deep seated desire to prove just how little you know about anything.

Ask yourself: how many pilots flew over Tokyo during the firebombing.

How many over Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Your post is deeply offensive to the families of the many thousands who died. Be ashamed of yourself.




top topics
 
11
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join