It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cynicalheathen
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: cynicalheathen
Well, there's an interesting take on the argument at least.
Yes, if the Constitution is meaningless, then the discussion of rights and responsibilities under same is meaningless.
However, you'd have a hard time proving that the Constitution is meaningless. Care to give that a go?
Rights are inherent. They can be violated, but not given or taken away.
The Constitution can be completely repealed and replaced tomorrow. That doesn't make the rights enumerated within go away. Ink on paper did not create them. The Articles of Confederation were replaced, the Constitution can be as well.
Ultimately, the only interpretation of the Constitution that matters is mine. As anyone who attempts to take my arms will find out. Rights are only for those willing to fight and die for them.
Keep thinking some bureaucrat in a suit or black robe is out to protect your best interests...
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Gryphon66
Nope.
Can I go out and buy a new M4 ?
Nope.
No, your right to bear arms has not been limited.
Think before speaking.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Got to say my auto ordnance semi-auto Thompson is a lot of fun to shoot... yes its not an actual gangster style Chicago piano... but I still enjoy it.
====================
I do find it more than a little insulting that I can be trusted to work on and around Nuclear tipped air launch cruise missile on the BUFF... but certain types of guns I am not to be trusted with according to the laws... that logic seems a bit off to me.
Do you own any other firearms?
Can you buy handguns, shotguns and rifles in your state?
Then your right to bear arms is has not been infringed.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Got to say my auto ordnance semi-auto Thompson is a lot of fun to shoot... yes its not an actual gangster style Chicago piano... but I still enjoy it.
====================
I do find it more than a little insulting that I can be trusted to work on and around Nuclear tipped air launch cruise missile on the BUFF... but certain types of guns I am not to be trusted with according to the laws... that logic seems a bit off to me.
originally posted by: Gryphon66Rights are inherent? Who says? Without the rule-of-law or some similar social compact, your "rights" are limited to what you personally can take and hold.
You're arguing from an ideal perspective. Yes, it's possible that the Constitution could be repealed and replaced tomorrow, but there is virtually zero chance of that actually happening. A large meteorite could strike and kill us all thus negating any further questions about rights or the lack of them -- that's also unlikely.
The only interpretation of the Constitution that matters TO YOU is yours. I accept that.
No one is coming for your guns; that's a fear-mongering myth.
originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: LockNLoad
I understand Gryphon's argument. It's basically that everyone has the right to own anything and the stores (states) have the right not to sell.
Is that infringing on anyone's right as per 2nd?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: neo96
So, you don't want any of the weapons that you don't own?
Your right to bear arms is firmly in place.
You don't want to spend the money that would be required to acquire a certain type of weapon?
Your right to bear arms is firmly in place.
So a component of your gun (if you lived somewhere else than you do) would be limited, but you could still own the gun, a proper magazine and ammunition?
Your right to bear arms is firmly in place.
A short barrel weapon has been made illegal, but long barreled weapons are available for purchase?
Your right to bear arms is firmly in place.
Smoke grenades? LOL.
Background check to buy? But you can buy, right?
Your right to bear arms is firmly in place.
The only complaints you're bringing up are that you can't have any gun or any size magazine just because you want it.
You can own guns, of varying type, and all you have to do is be certified that you're not a criminal or a mental case?
Your right to bear arms is firmly in place.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Gryphon66
That is, by definition, a limit on my right to bear arms.
Im not going to campaign for the legalization of the Thompson....but it sure would be nice to be able to legally own one.
A State limiting sales of weapons is only a limit by YOUR definition ... not the Constitution's, the Supreme Court's or any State government.
So you can't own one type of weapon, but you can (and presumably do) own firearms, right?
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: Rosinitiate
I would use it on the damn pocket gophers digging up my field.