It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CNN admits their reports on Fox News anchor were false

page: 4
40
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 07:05 AM
link   
So far we have news paper's reporting wiretaps .The Pres. says ok I was wiretapped. Same news paper demands proof. Finally White house gets busted spying on Trump . The left goes bonkers and demands proof. Nunes releases it. Two weeks later it is disclosed as incidental by left.
Judge discloses that British played a part in spying ,left goes nuts demands proof. Two weeks later truth comes out but left says it was just incidental.
So far there is a lot of incidental spying and nothing else.




posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 07:27 AM
link   
I have little confidence that CNN will learn from this. They will continue to persecute those that tell any story or do anything that does not fit with their (or should I say the DNC's) agenda.
edit on 15/4/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 08:40 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

There's a HUGE difference between what judge Napolitano accused Obama of doing and what has been recently revealed, and NO, CNN has NOT apologized or retracted their story because they were right about the judge all along.

The judge accused Obama of asking foreign intelligence services to conduct surveillance on Trump and his campaign and that's NOT what has been revealed, so why would they retract their story or reverse their opinion?

Maybe you or the Judge could provide one shred of evidence supporting judge Napolitano's claim that Obama asked these foreign intelligence agencies to spy on Trump?

Or, that any communications they did capture were anything other than incidental?

No? ......... I didn't think so.

Judge Napolitano was wrong when he said what he said, he's still wrong today and everyone with half a brain knows it.

Just keep feeding those false narratives to your supporters and sooner or later it's gonna come back to bite you in the ass.

Credibility is a precious thing to lose and it's extremely hard to regain once lost.
edit on 15-4-2017 by Flatfish because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 09:14 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

They have nothing to learn from this. Nappy is FOS as usual. CNN didn't apologise or retract any part of their story. They don't have to. This stretch to try to include this as wiretapping trump tower is asinine.
edit on 4152017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: MajorAce

When did all that happen again?
I mean all that b.s. detail you've included.
Because every single official asked both left and right say there's no evidence that Obama spied on trump.
Not now not then not ever.
What proof has come out?

Trumps going down dude. He's going to crash and burn.



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 09:31 AM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Come back after you study up.
edit on 4152017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 09:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Flatfish

So you automatically believe Obama couldn't possibly have somebody look for info on competing candidates.

He did it with the IRS targeting and that was proven true.

The 2016 election was the highest stakes game of all time.




posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 09:34 AM
link   
a reply to: TarzanBeta

Umm this isn't a game.
The judge wasn't correct. Not even a little.
The Britt didn't spy on trump for Obama.
It didn't happen dude and this so called judge is full of it.



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 09:34 AM
link   
And CNN has not apologized because they weren't wrong.



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MajorAce



Trumps going down dude.


Yup. Down in HISTORY...as the President who saved America.



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 09:43 AM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Down in history already . As the stupidest craziest rudest most out of control moron ever to manage to gain the office.
Just ask anyone.
Don't you own a tv?
Haven't you seen that hardly anyone is on his side of things?
Don't you have eyes to see that everybody is laughing at him? That no one respects him?
That no one believes a word that comes out of his mouth?
I mean where have you been?

The guys a big loser and he's taking American down not making us great.



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 09:57 AM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

Right the same Intel agencies that provided Bush the cover story of Sadaam's WMD possession. You dont see a pattern here?



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 10:15 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

You try again. He was,wrong. Brits didn't spy on him for Obama.
It did not happen. Ever...



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 11:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Flatfish

So you automatically believe Obama couldn't possibly have somebody look for info on competing candidates.

He did it with the IRS targeting and that was proven true.

The 2016 election was the highest stakes game of all time.



I never said it couldn't "possibly" have happened and neither did judge Napolitano, he said it "did" happen.

Do you even see the difference?

And no one has proven a damn thing with respect to the IRS targeting accusations, much less that "Obama did it."

That stuff is about as true as your claim that CNN has admitted they were wrong about the judge, pure horse sh#t.

Keep dreaming.
edit on 15-4-2017 by Flatfish because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 15 2017 @ 11:22 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


What CNN actually reported was that virtually EVERY European intelligence agency picked up on connections between Trump operatives and Russian agents.

Ponder exactly what THAT means for a moment ...

It's not comforting

I actually think all this noisy resistance to that simple fact is the sound and fury of deer caught in the headlights, signifying not much more than panic and disappointment - all told by idiots

Or something like that :-)



posted on Apr, 16 2017 @ 03:43 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




posted on Apr, 16 2017 @ 08:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

That's not quite the same thing as them surveiling trump.
Incidental capture.

Back in January the BBC and others all reported that they were using warrants taken out on others, but the actual target was Trump. So the articles back in January stated that the 'incidental' capture of intelligence was not actually incidental, it only appeared that way, and Trump was the actual target.



posted on Apr, 16 2017 @ 08:25 AM
link   
a reply to: TonyS

Hi Tony,

The CNN staff and management are "paving the way to Communism - The Destiny of all Mankind." However, their Marxist goals are delayed at least 4 years until they see to it that Hillary is elected in 2020. Their commie goals are further delayed by the time Hillary (and Senator Chelsea Clinton) will need to implement her "plan for us," - a north Korea (nK) style Communist dictatorship. Remember, Hillary was trained by the late Stalinist, Saul Alinsky.

What the CNN staff and management need to do,
and this will give them immediate sociopath gratification ...

They need a one way ticket to Communist north Korea (nK) where they will fit right in, to serve The Dear Leader, Kim Jong Un and join the Workers Party of north Korea. There, they'll have a bright future as they plus up the nK propaganda machine by doing what they do best - Communist propaganda.



posted on Apr, 16 2017 @ 09:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Too bad Napolitano wasn't right.
Yes there were intercepts captured by a few different foreign intelligence agencies between Russian operatives that mentioned trump in dealings and yes this information was passed on to U.S. intelligence because it posed a potential risk to the United States.
We share intelligence with other countries all the time. Eyes everywhere.
That's not quite the same thing as them surveiling trump.
Incidental capture.



Incidental capture.

Incidental capture.

Incidental capture.

Educate yourself:

www.youtube.com...

Specifically from 25:20 -25:52

He clearly states that incidental collection that has no bearing on intelligence gathering is normally purged from the NSA database. That appears not to have happened and was disseminated among various intelligence groups.
edit on R532017-04-16T09:53:35-05:00k534Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)

edit on R542017-04-16T09:54:14-05:00k544Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 16 2017 @ 10:00 AM
link   
Maybe I have a way so that everyone can be happy and right? XD

Judge nepolitano was right about Obama having information on Trump via foreign intelligence agencies but worded it in an unfortunate way.

CNN were right to point out this inaccuracy and have no reason to apologize.

But what is the betting that Obama discussed this information on Trump with Clinton, that's more important to me than Nepolitano's embelishment.



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join