It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chaeone86
Thank-you for that thorough explanation. It looks like the only thing we know for certain is that there are probably, as you said, much larger Non-nuclear bombs being kept Top-Secret.
I'm looking forward to the time we've developed a way to eliminate a dangerous leader, without exploding a single bomb. Destroying lots of people and property, just to take out one guy, is like using dynamite to kill a fly, IMO.
ever seen the cia's ice bullet gun? its been used. ends up giving u a heart attack and once it melts away theres really nothing left but a small spot on the body of the victim
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: chaeone86
Thank-you for that thorough explanation. It looks like the only thing we know for certain is that there are probably, as you said, much larger Non-nuclear bombs being kept Top-Secret.
I'm looking forward to the time we've developed a way to eliminate a dangerous leader, without exploding a single bomb. Destroying lots of people and property, just to take out one guy, is like using dynamite to kill a fly, IMO.
ever seen the cia's ice bullet gun? its been used. ends up giving u a heart attack and once it melts away theres really nothing left but a small spot on the body of the victim
First time I've heard of it! After investing billions of our dollars in the CIA over recent decades, it's good to see that they're doing more than simply spying.
Saw in a scientific magazine the other day (at the dentist office) that some intelligence agency and a private company are working together to develop tiny drones, no bigger than a fly. Imagine what one of those could do to neutralize a dangerous dictator.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: TheScale
Thanks! I'll watch that video after posting this message. It's being reported that ONLY 36 ISIS fighters were killed by the Mother Of All Bombs yesterday.
36 ISIS Killed by MOAB: www.cnn.com...
It cost $16 million. We (taxpayers) paid $445,000 to eliminate each ISIS fighter. Was it worth it?
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: TheScale
Thanks! I'll watch that video after posting this message. It's being reported that ONLY 36 ISIS fighters were killed by the Mother Of All Bombs yesterday.
36 ISIS Killed by MOAB: www.cnn.com...
It cost $16 million. We (taxpayers) paid $445,000 to eliminate each ISIS fighter. Was it worth it?
not as bad as shooting a patriot missile at a couple hundred dollar drone. also better then one american life being lost to go in and try to clear those tunnels.
originally posted by: chaeone86
a reply to: chaeone86
And just for fun, I've been told we have much greater than the MOAB in our non Nuke stock too. Game changing tech. But on follow up I am told it's not for me to know.
A real intelligence or experimental weapon participant would. Not. Be. On. Here.
Enjoy your teenage dream.
originally posted by: carewemust
It cost $16 million. We (taxpayers) paid $445,000 to eliminate each ISIS fighter. Was it worth it?
As many as 36 suspected Islamic State militants were killed in Afghanistan when the United States dropped "the mother of all bombs," its largest non-nuclear device ever unleashed in combat, the Afghan defense ministry said on Friday.
Thursday's strike came as U.S. President Donald Trump dispatches his first high-level delegation to Kabul, amid uncertainty about his plans for the nearly 9,000 American troops stationed in Afghanistan.
(Graphic - U.S. drops massive bomb in Afghanistan IMG : tmsnrt.rs/2nKoKks)
The deaths have not been independently verified, but ministry spokesman Dawlat Waziri said no civilians were harmed in the massive blast that targeted a network of caves and tunnels.
"No civilian has been hurt and only the base, which Daesh used to launch attacks in other parts of the province, was destroyed," Waziri said in a statement.
originally posted by: DrHammondStoat
Was it worth it? Was it really so important to destroy this base when it seems not many ISIS soldiers where actually there?
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: chaeone86
a reply to: chaeone86
And just for fun, I've been told we have much greater than the MOAB in our non Nuke stock too. Game changing tech. But on follow up I am told it's not for me to know.
They're probably talking about nanoparticulate halogen/metal solid explosives. Damndest stuff you ever saw, and going into the next nuke designs after a few more revs. Material science guys come up with the craziest stuff.
Go drop that on your supposed relatives.
A real intelligence or experimental weapon participant would. Not. Be. On. Here.
Enjoy your teenage dream.
You're pretty far off base with that one, ATS is read pretty regularly in the community, especially by the engineering types. More than one of us have been here as time went by. Also some pretty well known authors in the military/aerospace community.
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: ManBehindTheMask
China is taking care of NK. No need in worrying about them. We'll be perfectly fine.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: TheScale
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: TheScale
Thanks! I'll watch that video after posting this message. It's being reported that ONLY 36 ISIS fighters were killed by the Mother Of All Bombs yesterday.
36 ISIS Killed by MOAB: www.cnn.com...
It cost $16 million. We (taxpayers) paid $445,000 to eliminate each ISIS fighter. Was it worth it?
not as bad as shooting a patriot missile at a couple hundred dollar drone. also better then one american life being lost to go in and try to clear those tunnels.
Right on, regarding your second statement. We can take it further, by wiping ISIS and all violent terrorist groups from existence. Save thousands of innocent lives by take a proactive approach.
originally posted by: Noncents
originally posted by: DrHammondStoat
Was it worth it? Was it really so important to destroy this base when it seems not many ISIS soldiers where actually there?
Use one weapon to take out an entire enemy base? Yeah, I'd say it was worth it.