It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Al-Qaeda is on our side in Syria says Clinton adviser

page: 1
21
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:
+8 more 
posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 10:51 AM
link   
Wikileaks has an email from the Hillary Clinton archives that states Al-Qaeda" is on the side of the U.S.

The message came from one of Clinton's trusted people, Jake Sullivan.

Dated Feb 2012 right in the middle of the Syrian conflicts.

Well we never really know who is fighting who do we.

This email was reviewed by the U.S. State Department.


“Al-Qaeda is on our side in Syria”: Clinton adviser

Hillary Clinton’s former policy adviser told the presidential candidate that Al-Qaeda is on the side of the United States in Syria, Wikileaks revealed on Wednesday.

“AQ is on our side in Syria,” former policy adviser, Jake Sullivan, told Hillary Clinton in an email dated February 12th, 2012.

While Hillary Clinton failed to win the U.S. presidency in 2016, she was considered a major advocate for regime change in Syria.






posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 10:57 AM
link   
And here's an op-ed from a NYTimes site:

Why Is Trump Fighting ISIS in Syria?


The Trump foreign policy team has been all over the map on what to do next in Syria — topple the regime, intensify aid to rebels, respond to any new attacks on innocent civilians. But when pressed, there is one idea everyone on the team seems to agree on: “The defeat of ISIS,” as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson put it.

Well, let me add to their confusion by asking just one question: Why?

Why should our goal right now be to defeat the Islamic State in Syria? Of course, ISIS is detestable and needs to be eradicated. But is it really in our interest to be focusing solely on defeating ISIS in Syria right now?

Let’s go through the logic: There are actually two ISIS manifestations.


? "Real" or "Virtual" ?



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 11:03 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Who cares? Al Qaeda are the good guys now, remember?






posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 11:04 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

They were on our side in Libya too, which is why we needed a new boogeyman, the Al-CIAeda deception had been exposed.

Cue ISUS.

Libya: Al Qaeda flag flown above Benghazi courthouse.

Just keep spreading this video:

US Peace Council on Syria: nearly everything being reported is a lie.



edit on 13-4-2017 by gladtobehere because: wording



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 11:05 AM
link   
You know anyone the Hellery team supports has got to be a shining example of humanity...
Right?...



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 11:05 AM
link   
All I have to say is...What in the actual f***?

No wonder so many people are disillusioned.
This is the reason why politics needs completely revamped.

This isn't about who America needs to destroy.
It's about who stands to gain the most from the war.


It utterly atrocious.





posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 11:05 AM
link   
If anybody ever finds out who our dog in this fight actually is, can they please let me know.

Thanks in advance.



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 11:20 AM
link   
Uh am I to understand that as a good thing? They weren't on our side in our own homeland on 9/11 so what am I to believe here?

-Alee



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 11:52 AM
link   
They where armed and trained to fight the russians by the cia in the 80s.

They then turned on the americans before 911.

And then joined the fight against isis in libya.

You just cant make this stuff up, one day there friends the next there the boogeyman.



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen
Jesus #ing Christ! There should literally be no more respect left for the Clinton legacy in America. Minor sex trafficking in Haiti, support of the terrorists that killed 3000 American lives on 9/11, open corruption and subversion of their own political party, just... WOW!

There better not be a damn organization left on Earth who will pay these sub human SCUM to speak at an event for them anymore! Can we prosecute yet, I mean goddamn! I would really love to see a "spit in their eye" challenge take off on social media. Where people around the world try to get the best landing spitting in any Clinton face wherever they show themselves in public. Eventually they will get the picture and just burrow back down into whatever nasty hole they crawled out of.



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

So I had to look at it sideways...

Looks to me it's just an admission of guilt...
Where else did "the base" gets it's weapons and training to set-off ied's from?

Where al-quida fails, isis steps in to become the great savior of humanity.
They work together to redistribute ME wealth, just not to middle eastern's.
/sarcasm



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
And here's an op-ed from a NYTimes site:

Why Is Trump Fighting ISIS in Syria?


The Trump foreign policy team has been all over the map on what to do next in Syria — topple the regime, intensify aid to rebels, respond to any new attacks on innocent civilians. But when pressed, there is one idea everyone on the team seems to agree on: “The defeat of ISIS,” as Secretary of State Rex Tillerson put it.

Well, let me add to their confusion by asking just one question: Why?



Why should our goal right now be to defeat the Islamic State in Syria? Of course, ISIS is detestable and needs to be eradicated. But is it really in our interest to be focusing solely on defeating ISIS in Syria right now?

Let’s go through the logic: There are actually two ISIS manifestations.


? "Real" or "Virtual" ?




Isis and Al Qaeda operatives have attacked us here at home. So we should only be fighting them in Syria, and not funding the rebels whom will eventually be attacking our citizens too. Why doesn't ISIS attack in DC? I think we know the answer to that.
edit on 13-4-2017 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 03:50 PM
link   


It's already known that Hillary / CIA / Obama / NATO etc are the ones who sent Al Qaeda into Syria from the get.

I know half the people around here always want to ignore it when I say it almost daily, but it's already in the timeline and do oh do check my sources:
ObamaHillaryCo.'s TIMELINE OF TERROR In The Middle East

Sending terrorist mercs in to blow up a government, how isn't that a WAR CRIME?

And using Al Qaeda / ISIS to do it: how isn't that TREASON?!?!

AND HOW ISN'T ALL OF THIS THE STORY OF THE DECADE?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?





posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 03:54 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Sound's like a sociopath with a distinct lack of human morality if that is actually his opinion and advice, he even sound's monstrous.

So while neither of those two faction's are who or what you would want to invite around for Sunday lunch neither is He, still I will say this, Al Qaeda despite being radical Muslim lunatic's are actually a slightly nicer group than Isis so tactically he is correct but arming them, allowing them to prosper or using them would actually be storing up problem's for the future and just how much better than the Isis scum they really are is open to debate as it may be that there really is not much difference between them.

Still while they were and are pretty bad I have not heard of Al Qaeda committing anywhere near as many atrocity's as Isis have been doing and are indeed still doing but they probably did if not on the same scale.

Still that is one serious mistake for any group to have that kind of idiot as an adviser, his opinion to be quite frank stink's, so he would have had the clinton administration if they had gotten into power consider arming this group or giving them less heat, in return they would have come back to bite the US and the west in general very hard on the back side and caused serious harm further down the line, I take it he really does not understand the time honoured tradition of nipping a problem in the bud before it become's too big to handle.

Once again Flaming idiot.

edit on 13-4-2017 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 03:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: LABTECH767

Al Qaeda despite being radical Muslim lunatic's are actually a slightly nicer group than Isis so tactically he is correct


Al Qaeda = 9.9 / 10 on the Murderous Villains Scale.
ISIS = 10 / 10 on the Murderous Villains Scale.

Lets send Al Qaeda into Syria to blow up the government woohoo! And then give them further weapons and training when the initial attempt fails yeyeah! And when people try to expose it lets label them Russian propagandists oh yeah!!!
edit on 13-4-2017 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 04:03 PM
link   
Ask yourself this question why is your savior Donald Trump continuing this idiotic foreign policy? What's next is he going to continue Obamacare?



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Ha I did address that point, letting them prosper or even arming them would be the act of a short sighted idiot which this man obviously seem's to be, that or the live's they would inevitably take simply don't matter to him and he was looking at his own short term goal's.
Personally if there were not so many innocent people in Syria including one of the oldest christian community's in the world I would say go medieval on there arse as only real war which we simply do not wage anymore would cure that problem once and for all.
My humble opinion is that both group's should be targeted with equal conviction but tactically doing so would merely drive Al Qaeda into Isis arm's and they would merge so it is prudent to keep them divided for now.



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 04:30 PM
link   
a reply to: conspiracy nut

I didnt realize Trump is arming and aiding Al Qaeda. Missed that topic somehow....



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: havok


Isn't it obvious that America has been slowly becoming a Fascist state along with the UK and several other Governments around the world. Spying on honest citizens, CCTV cameras in the main centres, imposing censorship, to stop free speech these are not the actions of a democracy, they are the actions of criminal governments paranoid of the actions of their own people when the penny drops. God help us.



posted on Apr, 13 2017 @ 05:33 PM
link   
I am on the side of law and due process. When we cannot be open and honest about why we are killing, we are well and truly in to the dark side.




top topics



 
21
<<   2 >>

log in

join