It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I thought the airline had the right to ask anyone to leave the plane.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Infoshill
That's pretty much what I was saying.
The guys agreed to those terms when he bought his ticket.
Be this as it may, a judge in a court will probably rule that it is incumbent upon the customer to make himself aware of applicable terms and conditions.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: theworldisnotenough
We shall see I guess.
Had they just jumped on him I would totally agree.
He refused to leave the plane and they had to use force. That changes things in my mind.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: theworldisnotenough
They are lying stating the flight was 'overbooked'. It wasn't, every passenger booked their flight ahead of time, the plane was full, there were no 'spare seats'.
They covered up the 'add ons' with the overbooking explanation. My guess is they also lied about who the 'add ons' were. They claim they were employees but we already know they lied about overbooking too...
I'd like to know who the add ons were too. Any camera video who was sitting in those 'vacated' seats?
No?
Theres your sign.
originally posted by: research100
not that I know of... also the passengers bood them when they came on the plane...oh and their own rules state that the passenger cannot be removed once they are in the seats..for overbooking..that is to be taken care of before they gate, they claimed it was overbooking
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: theworldisnotenough
They are lying stating the flight was 'overbooked'. It wasn't, every passenger booked their flight ahead of time, the plane was full, there were no 'spare seats'.
They covered up the 'add ons' with the overbooking explanation. My guess is they also lied about who the 'add ons' were. They claim they were employees but we already know they lied about overbooking too...
I'd like to know who the add ons were too. Any camera video who was sitting in those 'vacated' seats?
No?
Theres your sign.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: Infoshill
That's pretty much what I was saying.
The guys agreed to those terms when he bought his ticket.
- the moral of the story - is that when you screw up - you have to up the incentive till someone bites
originally posted by: research100
a reply to: odzeandennz
did they not present it as overbooking when this went down, then it came out later that they needed the seats for 4 employees
originally posted by: coop039
originally posted by: research100
not that I know of... also the passengers bood them when they came on the plane...oh and their own rules state that the passenger cannot be removed once they are in the seats..for overbooking..that is to be taken care of before they gate, they claimed it was overbooking
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: theworldisnotenough
They are lying stating the flight was 'overbooked'. It wasn't, every passenger booked their flight ahead of time, the plane was full, there were no 'spare seats'.
They covered up the 'add ons' with the overbooking explanation. My guess is they also lied about who the 'add ons' were. They claim they were employees but we already know they lied about overbooking too...
I'd like to know who the add ons were too. Any camera video who was sitting in those 'vacated' seats?
No?
Theres your sign.
I heard that as well, about not being able to boot them once they are in the seat. I didnt know if it was true or not.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: theworldisnotenough
They are lying stating the flight was 'overbooked'. It wasn't, every passenger booked their flight ahead of time, the plane was full...
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: theworldisnotenough
These last minute additions were some way more special, from a 'higher authority', the cover story of 'employees' was a lie too, imo.
Do we know yet who they were? Need to see video, the video of the removal is a rash on the internet, video of who replaced them, nonexistent.
originally posted by: F4guy
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: theworldisnotenough
These last minute additions were some way more special, from a 'higher authority', the cover story of 'employees' was a lie too, imo.
Do we know yet who they were? Need to see video, the video of the removal is a rash on the internet, video of who replaced them, nonexistent.
Other passenger on the flight reported that the "new" 4 were 2 Republic Airlines pilots and 2 flight attendants. That would be the normal crew for an Embraer 170/175. Republic operates some flights as United Express.