It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burntheships
Now, on to the fact checking;
She went on to give us her spiel on the "unmasking" of Trump and associates.
Phones broke so cant hit bottom line
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Denoli
You said Since when is it illegal to tell a lie?and i replied under oath a reply to: Krazysh0tsee how you miss stuff when going full retard
No. I only see how you can be confusing when you only respond with one line posts like the T&C says not to do.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Not really. Half of those things I don't think she was lying about.
Hillary didn't even see jail time over Benghazi. If you think that Rice will see any for her even less involvement is just laughably partisan.
You have zero proof that Susan unmasked illegally. Saying otherwise is dishonest.
originally posted by: burntheships
What is partisan about bragging about "escaped prosecution"?
Oh, wait! Don't look in the mirror there....
I may not have evidence, however who authorized her to unmask anyone?
originally posted by: smurfy
I've never heard her mention Trumps unmasking..I've never heard her mention any names for that matter.
I have seen it stated that she said Trumps transition team, and it's pretty certain that at least one of them is already under investigation for several years by now.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
Who cares? If it was legal then it doesn't matter who authorized it. You have no evidence of your claim and saying it was illegal is a lie.
originally posted by: seeker1963
Meh, is there really a point in arguing with someone who thinks lying is okay?
I mean how can you take anyone who takes that stance seriously from that point of statement going forward?
It shows the character or lack thereof of the individual......
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: smurfy
I've never heard her mention Trumps unmasking..I've never heard her mention any names for that matter.
I have seen it stated that she said Trumps transition team, and it's pretty certain that at least one of them is already under investigation for several years by now.
Which one is "under investigation?
Susan Rice and her politically motivated unmasking
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: smurfy
What position does he hold in Trumps cabinet?
Did Sean Hannity hold a position in Trumps cabinet?
originally posted by: Shamrock6
My understanding is that she requested it and somebody at the NSA had to authorize it and do it. The problem is that the policy for unmasking has a catch-all section where if the person requesting the unmasking can claim, and articulate, that they need to know names so they can understand the report better, then that person gets the names.
I think the better question in all of this is how could she possibly have needed to know names in order to understand the magnitude of what she was looking at? Either she was looking at garbage reports and was confused why anybody would think it was worth her time to read them, or she knew exactly what she was looking at and wanted to know who it was that was talking.
To me that's the real issue in all this: how in the hell was she able to claim, let alone convince somebody else, that she needed these names in order to understand what she was reading?