 |
|
Topic started on 2-2-2005 @ 02:44 PM by bigredenquirer
|
Hey all. Just a note....though you are probs already well aware, channel four has a special on tomorrow called "The Real Da Vinci Code" Looking at
the themes of the novel. I dont hold out too much hope as a similar programme they did on 9/11 theories was a bit of a whitewash...I couldnt bellieve
what I was seeing. But the promos look good enough so it may be worth a watch...If you're in Uk or have access to Channel Four on satellite or cable.
Thhink it is 9pm GMT Thursday
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-2-2005 @ 02:45 PM by wyatt43
|
yeah im going to watch it..... still need to buy the book though ..... might but it today.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-2-2005 @ 02:52 PM by d3v
|
gonna watch it too.
still got 50 pages to go though... excellent book.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-2-2005 @ 03:00 PM by bigredenquirer
|
I bought the book today finally. Won;t have time to read it before tomorrow but am familiar with the themes etc from Templar Revelation...holy blood
holy grail etc. Check back in here after the show so we can discuss what we reckon of it huh. Like I say tho after the 9/11 documentary I aint too
hopeful that it won't be more than just a patronising bebunking, but hey-ho, you never know
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-2-2005 @ 03:02 PM by JAK
|
I posted a little about it here too:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Jack
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 2-2-2005 @ 03:05 PM by Mindwalker
|
Reading the book too......................seen some clips for the program and it looks good...........will be working so my sky+ is all set up ready
!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-2-2005 @ 05:07 PM by d3v
|
It was very very good and really well presented.
I must admit, I am split down the middle on weather the theory in the Davinci Code book is real or not.
Its totally 50:50.
One thing he did skip on was why Saunria (SP?) made that huge fortune from discovering a myserious secret and he quickly said it was becuase people
paid him for giving them the blessing or God. What bollocks.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 3-2-2005 @ 05:18 PM by Janus
|
Sselling Mass was not un common and in a highly religious country like France quite lucrative. I have posted my thoughts on the program
here.
[edit on 3-2-2005 by Janus]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-2-2005 @ 09:41 AM by bigredenquirer
|
I thought the programme waas a whitewash just as expected. The amount that was left out was ridiculous, and robinson's patronising tone appalled. The
presentation from the very beginning was set up to debunk and the eveidence suggested and the magdelene/da vinci link was flawed (not paying enough
attention to John being on Jesus' other side, meaning the woman could not be JOhn
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 4-2-2005 @ 01:09 PM by d3v
|
Do u think it was Illuminati propoganda??
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-2-2005 @ 09:53 AM by pignut
|
The book ‘The DaVinci Code’ is strongly dependant upon Michael Baigent, Henry Lincoln, and Richard Leigh’s ‘The Holy Blood and Holy Grail’.
Whilst entertaining this book is mostly hypothesis put forward as if it is fact, without any real justification for doing so. There are also many
many historical inaccuracies that weaken the arguments still further. Darren Browns book is a poor imitation and has inherited most of the problems of
the earlier book. 'Foucault’s Pendulum' by Umberto Ecco is a much better novel that uses many of the same of themes.
The fact that Pierre Plantard supported the Vichy government during WWII that he served time in jail on two separate occasions first for running an
illegal secret society and later for fraud and embezzlement should be enough to cause one to doubt his credulity. Add to that that Plantard has
sworn under oath that the priory of Sion was a hoax would cause doubt in anybody’s mind as to the correctness of the views of Michael Baigent et al.
I guess that the views contained in the 'Holy Blood and Holy Grail' is just another religion now, either you believe them or you don’t, and I am
afraid that I don’t.
[edit on 19-2-2005 by pignut]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-2-2005 @ 12:15 PM by infinite
|
Originally posted by d3v
Do u think it was Illuminati propoganda?? 
the programme about it on channel 4?? or the book?
dont look into things too deeply
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-2-2005 @ 01:36 PM by Souljah
|
great book!
i have just finished reading it.
but i dont think i have channel 4 on my cable,
just bbc 1 and bbc prime of english channels.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-2-2005 @ 02:46 PM by masterp
|
The 'Da Vinci Code' book sucks big time. The 'Illuminati' is a much much better book...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-2-2005 @ 02:50 PM by justyc
|
Originally posted by masterp
The 'Da Vinci Code' book sucks big time. The 'Illuminati' is a much much better book... 
surely you mean 'the illuminatus' trilogy by robert anton wilson & robert shea?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-2-2005 @ 04:01 PM by Souljah
|
Originally posted by masterp
The 'Da Vinci Code' book sucks big time. The 'Illuminati' is a much much better book... 
you mean "Illuminati" by dan brown?
i was looking at it in a bookstore few days ago.
you say it is beter?
[edit on 19-2-2005 by Souljah]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-2-2005 @ 04:35 PM by justyc
|
Originally posted by Souljah
you mean "Illuminati" by dan brown?

dan browns book about the illuminati is called 'angels and demons'
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |