It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

putin iran respond not looking good

page: 3
12
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 03:49 PM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP
I know the narrative(s). Perhaps Assad did do it. Perhaps not.

I haven't seen anyone defending the use of gas.




posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 04:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Ill defend it.

If youre going to use gas, at least gas the right people.



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 04:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Idreamofme
a reply to: Phage

Ill defend it.

If youre going to use gas, at least gas the right people.



And who might that be?



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 04:27 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

The bad guys



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

Or... Start with the guys that are beheading people and posting their videos online. Then we can play it by ear after that



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 04:33 PM
link   
If Putin was so mad why hasn't he cancelled next week summit with Tillerson?



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 04:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Idreamofme

The ones using babies for human shields? Those ones?

See, that's a big problem with chemical weapons.


edit on 4/9/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 04:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

There is diplomatic relation between Russia and America. Russia has an ambassador in America and America has an ambassador in Russia.



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 04:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

Because right now its just a lovers quarrel. They are going to try and salvage the relationship before the divorce papers are finalized.

But putin swears, if he catches trump cheating one more time.....



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 04:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Its a big problem with ANY weapon



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 05:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP

Yeah.
A whole bunch of people are defending sarin gas attacks.


Who? Links?



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 05:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Idreamofme
a reply to: Phage

Ill defend it.

If youre going to use gas, at least gas the right people.


Yeah, see? Why not gas military targets, and use troops in areas where children are present to facilitate an escape for the children.



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 05:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Idreamofme
When Mr Putin threatens people i dont see him as playing chicken.


Bring it, suka.



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 07:02 PM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Putin isn't going to bring anything, all he has to do is arm the Syrians or Koreans and then set the fuse alight
Job done



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Putin isn't going to bring anything, all he has to do is arm the Syrians or Koreans and then set the fuse alight
Job done


He's already done both and, to be blunt, if Trump opts to fight either of those countries unconventionally, no US boots on the ground, using a purely airstrike campaign that scortches the Earth, Putin will have wasted Russia's money on that exercise.



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 10:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Sheesh


I expect that a small scale thing like doing an aircraft carrier, wouldn't cut it, it would have to be a large scale attack at the industrial war base of the American heartland. That would leave the American armies supply lines cut off. But they would have to have just cause. Only an attack on Russian soil would cause that sort of response. Like the man said it would be have to be nuclear. or nothing.
The American army is spread thinly on many fronts, that's a tactical mistake. When the lines of supply are worldwide, and can be cut off, that alone is a recipe for disaster. A serious strike on the American mainland, would mean their wouldn't be much of a country left. Power food internet fuel, in short supply, civil unrest growing fast, with a now unpopular government, need I go on.



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 10:47 PM
link   
Yo! DontTreadOnMe! You directed an alex jones thread into a twitter thread. Which makes no sense, especially when this thread and the thread 5 slots directly above this are identical.

You blind umpire?



posted on Apr, 9 2017 @ 11:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Putin isn't going to bring anything, all he has to do is arm the Syrians or Koreans and then set the fuse alight
Job done


He's already done both and, to be blunt, if Trump opts to fight either of those countries unconventionally, no US boots on the ground, using a purely airstrike campaign that scortches the Earth, Putin will have wasted Russia's money on that exercise.


Yeah, who could have ever imagined the US losing

Can remember a Tet offensive, where and who was that
American might humbled

I hope the US have lots of aeroplanes, lots of money and lots of men
You are never as secure as you think you are



posted on Apr, 10 2017 @ 02:23 AM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

Yes, and regardless of the Russian ranting there remains contact and discussion. I feel sorry for Putin as he's made a rod for his own back by supporting the dictator Assad.

The bigger threat to the wold is North Korea.



posted on Apr, 10 2017 @ 02:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Idreamofme

originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
Why cannot Russia & Iran pick another leader for Syria that will be more competent and less aggressive to the innocent in the middle of the conflicts there that the global community including USA gives the ok for.
Then the new Syrian leader leads the response against isil/daesh with the support of Russia, Iran and the US/UN?
Avoids US & Russia conflicts based on Syria. Puts Syria in control of their mainland w/ local direct support from assisting countries...




top topics



 
12
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join