It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pentagon says Russia May Have Directly Participated in Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack

page: 4
19
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 7 2017 @ 07:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

re: bombing on false intel

With his certain minor overseas bombings n raids that have failed, I've begun to wonder if he is trying to play the CIA like the ACA? Let them run their failures of a course till they blow up n get dismantled?

We know there's a lil behind-tha-scenes war between Trump n CIA. Not many ways to get back and fight them other than give em enough rope to hang themselves with. Afterall, we all know how much of a failure CIA intel was on Iraq that tha Don likes to mention every now n then. Perhaps Syria will be tha straw that breaks tha camels back?




posted on Apr, 7 2017 @ 08:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ohanka
Oh sure they were.

Lets use chemical weapons when we on the verge of victory just to rile up the moronic western world.

They used a Su-22 to drop chemical bombs, or was it a Su-24? Or maybe a Helicopter? So hard to keep track of the lies.


I heard almost the same thing as what's in the op. Only it wasn't a Russian drone, it was actually the Flying Spaghetti Monster that was hovering over there. There's even a picture of it. An official told me that the pentagon is now investigating the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. But it's supposed to be a secret so i cant tell you who that official is.


My god are these people for real?!



posted on Apr, 7 2017 @ 08:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Ohanka
Oh sure they were.

Lets use chemical weapons when we on the verge of victory just to rile up the moronic western world.

They used a Su-22 to drop chemical bombs, or was it a Su-24? Or maybe a Helicopter? So hard to keep track of the lies.


So you expect people who use chemical weapons on kids to do things sensibly and with smart thinking?

Please...


We dont even tnink it was Assad because it makes not #ing sense!

Assad was winning with conventional weapons and he had just got the west to back off.
Why would he screw everything up by using chemical weapons? Especially on a insignificant target!

Terrorists though have gotten hold of chemical weapons, and they do have a reason to use them IE to fool gullible US presidents and t
His idiot supporters into declaring war in assad and helping them win a war they are losing.


Anything is possible, but what makes even LESS sense is that the Assad government, and Russia would, could, or have allowed ISIS forces free reign of Syria to the point that ISIS is free to run around and move weapons including super high profile chemical weapons and munitions wherever they need them just so they (ISIS) can launch them on an Airbase, and then get out of Dodge so that Assad and Russia don't know, or have enough intelligence to deal with that big problem..

NOT BUYING INTO THAT ONE.



posted on Apr, 7 2017 @ 08:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Anything is possible, but what makes even LESS sense is that the Assad government, and Russia would, could, or have allowed ISIS forces free reign of Syria to the point that ISIS is free to run around and move weapons including super high profile chemical weapons and munitions wherever they need them just so they (ISIS) can launch them on an Airbase, and then get out of Dodge so that Assad and Russia don't know, or have enough intelligence to deal with that big problem..

NOT BUYING INTO THAT ONE.

Isn't this lack of control and general Wild Wild Middle East atmosphere WHY they've been running wild for so many years in the first place? How is your opposition having CWs far-fetched in that kind of chaos after this long?



posted on Apr, 7 2017 @ 08:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Anything is possible, but what makes even LESS sense is that the Assad government, and Russia would, could, or have allowed ISIS forces free reign of Syria to the point that ISIS is free to run around and move weapons including super high profile chemical weapons and munitions wherever they need them just so they (ISIS) can launch them on an Airbase, and then get out of Dodge so that Assad and Russia don't know, or have enough intelligence to deal with that big problem..

NOT BUYING INTO THAT ONE.

Isn't this lack of control and general Wild Wild Middle East atmosphere WHY they've been running wild for so many years in the first place? How is your opposition having CWs far-fetched in that kind of chaos after this long?


Okay then, if that is the case, then it means the Assad government and Russia together are allowing ISIS this luxury of being able to conduct these OPS which also means the Assad government and Russia are therefore responsible for the chemical attack by this collusion of sorts. So Bombing Assad is still the correct action, but bomb him instead of some airfields..



posted on Apr, 7 2017 @ 09:09 PM
link   
I wonder how the Russian people are taking the news about Russia possibly participating in this chemical attack. They just had some large protests against Putin just a few weeks ago. One issue that tugs on the hearts of people and transcends borders is the killing of children. This could cause a huge backlash against Putin and Russia's government.



posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 12:57 AM
link   
Why is nobody discussing the most probable scenario?

The "white helmets" in Syria are complicit with, if not financially supported by the west. How hard would it be for the U.S., Israel, Saudi Arabia or any other of the shady U.S. allies to get chemical weapons into Syria and deploy them as a false flag?!

That's what makes the most logical sense. Considering that it's crystal clear how much the U.S. wants Assad ousted AND a major opportunity for the defense contractors to funnel loads of tax money into their pockets, there are absolute motives for a false flag here!

And while lying to the public, it seems fit to make the lie even bigger by lying about Russia's involvement to compound all of the other lies about Russia in order to lie and say they provoked us into war.

Ultimately, this is a proxy war between the Rothschilds and the BRICS Alliance that hopefully won't escalate to epic proportions.

But for the record, the idea that Russia was complicit in these acts has no logical legs to stand on. Unless you choose to look at Russia with the same lenses that your masters would approve of.



posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 01:11 AM
link   
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

I dont know what happened but I do know there were 6 official story lines on the bombing/strafing of the Medecin Sans Frontier hospital in Afghanistan before the final version and so far there have been three types of offending aircraft in this incident.

This seems to be a consistent theme due to the fact MSM relies on the CIA/Pentagon for its news whom often aren't on the spot and dont know themselves. Western MSM longer has reporters on the ground whilst Al Jezeera and RT do which means they have better control of the narrative.Until investigative reporting returns to the west they are not going to win the information war.



posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 04:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Ohanka
Oh sure they were.

Lets use chemical weapons when we on the verge of victory just to rile up the moronic western world.

They used a Su-22 to drop chemical bombs, or was it a Su-24? Or maybe a Helicopter? So hard to keep track of the lies.


So you expect people who use chemical weapons on kids to do things sensibly and with smart thinking?

Please...


We dont even tnink it was Assad because it makes not #ing sense!

Assad was winning with conventional weapons and he had just got the west to back off.
Why would he screw everything up by using chemical weapons? Especially on a insignificant target!

Terrorists though have gotten hold of chemical weapons, and they do have a reason to use them IE to fool gullible US presidents and t
His idiot supporters into declaring war in assad and helping them win a war they are losing.


Anything is possible, but what makes even LESS sense is that the Assad government, and Russia would, could, or have allowed ISIS forces free reign of Syria to the point that ISIS is free to run around and move weapons including super high profile chemical weapons and munitions wherever they need them just so they (ISIS) can launch them on an Airbase, and then get out of Dodge so that Assad and Russia don't know, or have enough intelligence to deal with that big problem..

NOT BUYING INTO THAT ONE.


Thsy gave not allowed anything.


Remember the trouble the USA had subduing insurgent s in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Russiand Syria have even less resources than the USA so of course they are having trouble subdueing them.



posted on Apr, 8 2017 @ 04:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed

originally posted by: Nyiah

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Anything is possible, but what makes even LESS sense is that the Assad government, and Russia would, could, or have allowed ISIS forces free reign of Syria to the point that ISIS is free to run around and move weapons including super high profile chemical weapons and munitions wherever they need them just so they (ISIS) can launch them on an Airbase, and then get out of Dodge so that Assad and Russia don't know, or have enough intelligence to deal with that big problem..

NOT BUYING INTO THAT ONE.

Isn't this lack of control and general Wild Wild Middle East atmosphere WHY they've been running wild for so many years in the first place? How is your opposition having CWs far-fetched in that kind of chaos after this long?


Okay then, if that is the case, then it means the Assad government and Russia together are allowing ISIS this luxury of being able to conduct these OPS which also means the Assad government and Russia are therefore responsible for the chemical attack by this collusion of sorts. So Bombing Assad is still the correct action, but bomb him instead of some airfields..
.


What the #? How did you arrive at that "logic"?

If havi g terrorists attack you means you are colluding with the terrorists?

My your "logic" then the USA shoulr of bombed the Japanese government for the 1997 sarin attack.

O and someone better bomb the USA for 9/11.



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join