US launches Tomahawks on Syrian airbases

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: JinMI

Because propaganda always includes dead children in the streets.

That's my point. It's all I've heard/seen for the past two days.

Assad doesn't gain anything by chemical bombing his own, regardless of supposed affiliation. Russia does. U.S. does.

You might want to read up a bit on the civil war in Syria.

Tillerson is scheduled to visit Russia and meet with the foreign minister on April 12. If it still happens it may be the one to watch.

www.bloomberg.com...

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: JinMI

Assad doesn't gain anything by chemical bombing his own, regardless of supposed affiliation. Russia does. U.S. does.

True could be a Russian false flag by the FSB to drag the US and Russia in to a shooting war.

Putin makes more money off the eastern military industrial complex.

My theory is that intel in exchange for removal of sanctions.

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: toysforadults

Bull#. I voted for him, in part because he campaigned strongly on the principle that the U.S. shouldn't be involved in regime change. And yet here we are...

This is NOT a regime change action. Get educated on the issue, then comment. Stop making things up.

It is quite right to point out that Trumps campaign platform included the end of intervention in the Middle East.

Educate your own self...

"We will stop racing to topple foreign regimes that we know nothing about, that we shouldn't be involved with," Trump said, insisting the United States must end a "destructive cycle of intervention and chaos."

That's not what I was saying. Read to understand. Cruise missile strikes are not "regime change". YOU educate YOURself. Thanks.

I read YOU clear enough, you deflect from the truth here.

Every single missile, bomb, shell and soldier is directly part of the process of Regime Change (overthrow) of the Syrian government.

Oh ok. So every single time we've ever bombed a country, we ousted their leader. Got it. Brb, I got some history books to correct. You know nothing, stop spreading ignorance.

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
If you guys who believe this story can't stop for a second to consider you are being played we are genuinely doomed as a people.

24hr news cycle gold fish, the whole lot of you.

Michael Hastings....remember him?

Gadaffi....remember him?

Sun Tzu "Art of War" you better freaking read it.

Steve Bannon out....

Flynn out.....

Globalist win...we lose.

Wake the # up people!

Whose being played ?

Of the years of civil war in Syria and the hundreds of threads on here about it.

And terrorist propaganda showing them having chemical warfare killing rabbits, and the ingredients being procured by the friends of Syria.

What's Russia's response anybody know?

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: JinMI

Because propaganda always includes dead children in the streets.

That's my point. It's all I've heard/seen for the past two days.

Assad doesn't gain anything by chemical bombing his own, regardless of supposed affiliation. Russia does. U.S. does.

You might want to read up a bit on the civil war in Syria.

I'm aware it has happened and partly the reasoning. Things seem to be a little to neat and scripted this time around however.

originally posted by: BlueAjah

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: JinMI

Because propaganda always includes dead children in the streets.

That's my point. It's all I've heard/seen for the past two days.

Assad doesn't gain anything by chemical bombing his own, regardless of supposed affiliation. Russia does. U.S. does.

You might want to read up a bit on the civil war in Syria.

Maybe you should? 6 years of BS around that war and you still fall for the same tired old tricks?

Syrian civil war.

And we just picked a god-damned side.

originally posted by: Willtell
What's Russia's response anybody know?

Nyet.

originally posted by: roadgravel
If a country is going to be attacked over this issue, I would think the world would demand proof of the incident, not just the "word" of a government.

Whose president argues that everything is fake news. But buys this BS hook, line and sinker.

Terrible

Remember all those Tweets where he condemned "unnecessary military action" and when he said he wouldn't intervene in Syria


Can't hide the Neocon forever

a reply to: burdman30ott6

My apologies. Wasn't trying to get partisan or anything. But Vietnam was before my time so I'm not familiar with all the details on who did what and why those were started or who authorized them.

a reply to: xuenchen

I bet they were not warned ahead of time.

Or Russia just 'hacked' the DNC again, and moved their snip.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
Syrian civil war.

And we just picked a god-damned side.

That was picked long ago i'm afraid.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: JinMI

Assad doesn't gain anything by chemical bombing his own, regardless of supposed affiliation. Russia does. U.S. does.

True could be a Russian false flag by the FSB to drag the US and Russia in to a shooting war.

Putin makes more money off the eastern military industrial complex.

A valid point worth considering...yet here we are.

Either we are responsible to justify tomahawks or goaded by someone else to send tomahawks.

The issue however is this is way above Trumps mental capacity and the timing giving the reshuffle of his National Security Council is very, very, very concerning.

The US military is back in play and they clearly want this.

They say Hillary would have started WW3 and it turns out that Trump is doing it.

Major kek.

looks like we got our balls back. i believe this was a good message, new management is in charge and apparently they are kicking some butt

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BlueAjah

The solution at the time did not work.

Actually, it did.
Russia brokered the deal to remove Assad's chemical weapons.

Right, what red line? After disarmament, the red line could no longer exist. Peoples memories are shorter than their attention spans.