It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

US launches Tomahawks on Syrian airbases

page: 10
122
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ohanka
"Russia reports Russian casualties at Shayrat airbase from Tomahawk strikes"

Well thanks for that Trump. What a liar.


What is your source of information? Do you have a link to a website?




posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: oddnutz
a reply to: face23785

well he just spoke and practically said he wants to form a coalition and end the war in Syria.



So he didn't say they're ousting Assad. Got it.

Again people, Tomahawk strikes are NOT regime change. If you're carrying on about regime change and "endless wars in the middle east", you are fake news.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah




The solution at the time did not work.

Actually, it did.
Russia brokered the deal to remove Assad's chemical weapons.


+12 more 
posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   
If you guys who believe this story can't stop for a second to consider you are being played we are genuinely doomed as a people.

24hr news cycle gold fish, the whole lot of you.

Michael Hastings....remember him?

Gadaffi....remember him?

Sun Tzu "Art of War" you better freaking read it.

Steve Bannon out....

Flynn out.....

Globalist win...we lose.

Wake the # up people!



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage


The missiles were aimed at Syrian fighter jets and other infrastructure but did not target anything that may have had chemical weapons.

He said that no Russian planes were at the airfield and that the cruise missiles did not target any Russian facilities.


I thought this was infrastructure and chem weapons destruction mission?



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   
If a country is going to be attacked over this issue, I would think the world would demand proof of the incident, not just the "word" of a government.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

I really find it hard to believe that Assad would do that. Not back then, and not now either.
Sorry, I just don't buy it.

Intel, huh?
That could be anything, even made up things.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
How many illegal wars must Republicans start before we stop allowing them to have power???

FFS, they just can't seem to interact on the world stage anymore without pulling out their dick and sticking it in someone's soup!!


Your own seems to be trying to reach your chicken noodle. Korea, Vietnam, Bosnia, Kosovo, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia... all illegal conflicts started by Democrats. Feel free to sit on Iraq and Afghanistan as your sole source of fodder, but the American body count in those two wars is utterly dwarfed by the Democrat's record of war in SE Asia. Hell, the battle of Khe Sahn in Vietnam alone produced as many American casualties as the first year of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   
Apparently they did tell the Russians.

Russia and Iran, Assad's allies, pose other problems. Russian military personnel and aircraft are embedded with Syria's, and Iranian troops and paramilitary forces are also on the ground helping Assad fight the array of opposition groups hoping to topple him.

Before the strikes, U.S. military officials said they informed their Russian counterparts of the impending attack. The goal was to avoid any accident involving Russian forces.

Nevertheless, Russia's Deputy U.N. ambassador Vladimir Safronkov warned that any negative consequences from the strikes would be on the "shoulders of those who initiated such a doubtful and tragic enterprise."

abc7ny.com...



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: face23785

Of course it is. And Tillerson implied as much today. But the populace needs to be duck-walked through it since it's clear it's not why Trump was elected.


OK, I'll go off what actually happened, you make things up. We can each have our own little corners.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI




I thought this was infrastructure and chem weapons destruction mission?

It was an attack on an airfield.
edit on 4/6/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Phage


The missiles were aimed at Syrian fighter jets and other infrastructure but did not target anything that may have had chemical weapons.

He said that no Russian planes were at the airfield and that the cruise missiles did not target any Russian facilities.


I thought this was infrastructure and chem weapons destruction mission?



They can't target Syria's chemical weapons because they don't exist



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI




Assad doesn't gain anything by chemical bombing his own, regardless of supposed affiliation. Russia does. U.S. does.


True could be a Russian false flag by the FSB to drag the US and Russia in to a shooting war.

Putin makes more money off the eastern military industrial complex.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Cue the false flag on American soil in 3.. 2..



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: allsee4eye
Russia was not warned of the attack.

twitter.com...


Can't be true. Trump is a russian stooge.
According to the lunatic libs on here.
edit on 2017-04-06T21:14:54-05:002201706America/Chicago4 by c2oden because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: NerdGoddess
I feel sick right now. I'm sure this harmed even more children and families.

I don't know what the answer is I guess that's why I'm not in charge but holy flock of sheep y'all....

I don't know what this means for us Americans but- worst case scenario- It's been real ATS.

-Alee.


"I don't know what this means for us Americans but- worst case scenario- It's been real ATS."

For the first time since I've been a member on ATS, I'm spooked by this.
With an idiot in charge, the actions unfolding, I cant see a "winning" outcome.
But if it is a case of the worst case scenario, I leave it with this.




edit on 6-4-2017 by Black_Fox because: SpeLLinG



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:14 PM
link   
The President says that the air strikes are in "vital national security interest".I suppose that is the new name of the Qatari pipeline.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: intrptr

originally posted by: face23785

originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: toysforadults

Bull#. I voted for him, in part because he campaigned strongly on the principle that the U.S. shouldn't be involved in regime change. And yet here we are...


This is NOT a regime change action. Get educated on the issue, then comment. Stop making things up.

It is quite right to point out that Trumps campaign platform included the end of intervention in the Middle East.

Educate your own self...


"We will stop racing to topple foreign regimes that we know nothing about, that we shouldn't be involved with," Trump said, insisting the United States must end a "destructive cycle of intervention and chaos."


That's not what I was saying. Read to understand. Cruise missile strikes are not "regime change". YOU educate YOURself. Thanks.

I read YOU clear enough, you deflect from the truth here.

Every single missile, bomb, shell and soldier is directly part of the process of Regime Change (overthrow) of the Syrian government.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
Does not anyone find it strange that media organization tweeted that they would cover the airstrikes and chemical weapons attack, the day before the actual chemical attack?? is that not a bit strange to some people??



No, nothing to see here I am certain.


You are clutching at straws. The guy was referring to covering past chlorine attacks in Hama. Khan Sheikhon isn't in Hama.

See his Facebook. You can translate to English using your right click facility.

www.facebook.com...



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 09:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: IAMTAT

Apparently Russia was informed prior to the attack.
Apparently there were no Russian assets at the airbase.

Apparently.
www.nytimes.com...


I bet they were not warned ahead of time.

Don't automatically trust the NYT.




new topics

top topics



 
122
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join