It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hopefully Trump government is now survieling Obama

page: 1
14
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 11:39 PM
link   
Hopefully Trump government is now survieling Obama and his cabinet due to evidence showing illegal collection and release of US intelligence.

It's only right! Anyone think Obama is wiretapped?




posted on Apr, 5 2017 @ 11:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Xeven

It's right on account Obama is still actively trying to run the government. Ergo, if I'm on terrorist watch lists for speaking out against our government obsessively committing global terrorism, then so should Obama for being one of the architects, er crap, wrong meeting, he should be for openly working towards the goals of sedition. On that note, the bulk of the people core in the machinations of the Democrat & Republican party's should be...



(post by Kevin009 removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 12:17 AM
link   
Two wrongs do not make a right.

So yeah, they should be wiretapping Obama. Since when he did it it wasn't considered wrong.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:20 AM
link   
Hey, Obama is in Tahiti. Every foreign overseas communications, right?



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Xeven

Nope.
Trump already knows the story he told was BS.
Now he want to change the focus.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:37 AM
link   
Sure. If Obama is talking to Russian agents, he's being "wire tapped." No doubt.
Somehow, I doubt he's doing so.


edit on 4/6/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Simpler requirements than that.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:42 AM
link   
a reply to: Neil4No1

You mean that the Trump administration is illegally surveilling private citizens?

No way. That's McCarthyism.

edit on 4/6/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

If what Trump says is true in regards to the spying, if legal, why not use those same tools against the previous president to prove his supposed innocense?

As accurate as Trump has been with any accustions before elected, people seem to forget that he is no longer President-elect Trump, but actual legit President Trump. With his previous odds, and now bein head hauncho with actual legit U.S. intelligence reports n any requests he asks, you really think he's gonna act on a question he ain't yet already know the answer to?



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Neil4No1

If what Trump says is true in regards to the spying, if legal, why not use those same tools against the previous president to prove his supposed innocense?
Because what Trump said, that Obama was tapping his phones, is not true. At least, no one can seem to find evidence that it happened. No matter how they try to spin it.


With his previous odds, and now bein head hauncho with actual legit U.S. intelligence reports n any requests he asks, you really think he's gonna act on a question he ain't yet already know the answer to?
He has a habit of tweeting anything that pops into his head. Some people think that's a good thing. I don't.


edit on 4/6/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Neil4No1

You mean that the Trump administration is illegally surveilling private citizens?

No way. That's McCarthyism.


Evelyn Farkas still had her toes in the spy water after leaving government.
www.cnbc.com...



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:52 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

What is it that you think she confessed to?



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

C'mon, even you gotta admit tha whole 'wire-tapping' hooplah was legit, it's just stuck up in a mess of technical wordplay legal jargon.

As far as tha tweets, haha, no disagreement there, but this is all bigger than that. Borrowed time.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:57 AM
link   
If Snowden and several others are correct every call, email, and possibly snail mail is being monitored by one of the alphabet agencies....so of course someone someplace knows what he is up to..Problem is who are you going to tell without admitting you are snooping ?



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 01:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Neil4No1




C'mon, even you gotta admit tha whole 'wire-tapping' hooplah was legit

False.

How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!


Unless, of course, you have evidence to back up his libelous claim.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 02:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Um, with everything learned n leaked, any info Trump may have is yes, highly top secret. The exact same reason why it's taking so long n revealed the tangled web that Obama left. With the recent National Defense bills passed these past few years, they can get away with mad corruptional, legally. Against what our country was founded against.

Yeah, it sucks n I'm curious as well to see all tha details, but this is all closed-door type stuff, unable to let us all know about all the spying they do on citizens while at tha same time having to deny any Wikileaks.

P.s. Don't forget, he is not President-elect Trump, but President Trump with legit power n U.S. intelligence.
edit on 6-4-2017 by Neil4No1 because: added



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 02:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Neil4No1




Um, with everything learned n leaked, any info Trump may have is yes, highly top secret.

He could, with his mighty pen, change that.
Why is what his campaign may have said to Russian agents classified? Unless he wants it to be?

edit on 4/6/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 02:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Classified due to how any info is obtained, obviously.

And yeah, change it all with tha stroke of a pen. Would be one helluva stir! Could happen as carefree as he can be. Would be interestin, to say the least. If we dare him hard enough, he may crack, heh.



posted on Apr, 6 2017 @ 02:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Neil4No1

Classified due to how any info is obtained, obviously.
You mean monitoring the phones of Russian agents? We know that they do that. We know that it's legal.


And yeah, change it all with tha stroke of a pen.
Might be a can of worms for him. No?

edit on 4/6/2017 by Phage because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
14
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join